被引用的驱逐卖方的合法性,以主张购买和灭绝的时效

Q4 Social Sciences
Maximiliano Silva Hanisch
{"title":"被引用的驱逐卖方的合法性,以主张购买和灭绝的时效","authors":"Maximiliano Silva Hanisch","doi":"10.4067/S0718-80722020000200051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following article seeks to examine if the seller can oppose the acquisitive and or the extinctive prescription in the name of the defended purchaser when he is sued to dispossession the purchased property. The present paper focuses on a doctrinal review and the analysis of the institute under the civil and procedural rules in force in our country.","PeriodicalId":36265,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LA LEGITIMACIÓN DEL VENDEDOR CITADO DE EVICCIÓN PARA ALEGAR LA PRESCRIPCIÓN ADQUISITIVA Y EXTINTIVA\",\"authors\":\"Maximiliano Silva Hanisch\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/S0718-80722020000200051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following article seeks to examine if the seller can oppose the acquisitive and or the extinctive prescription in the name of the defended purchaser when he is sued to dispossession the purchased property. The present paper focuses on a doctrinal review and the analysis of the institute under the civil and procedural rules in force in our country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-80722020000200051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-80722020000200051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下条款旨在审查卖方在被起诉剥夺所购财产时,是否可以以被辩护买方的名义反对取得时效和/或消灭时效。本文对我国现行民事诉讼规则下的该制度进行了理论回顾和分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LA LEGITIMACIÓN DEL VENDEDOR CITADO DE EVICCIÓN PARA ALEGAR LA PRESCRIPCIÓN ADQUISITIVA Y EXTINTIVA
The following article seeks to examine if the seller can oppose the acquisitive and or the extinctive prescription in the name of the defended purchaser when he is sued to dispossession the purchased property. The present paper focuses on a doctrinal review and the analysis of the institute under the civil and procedural rules in force in our country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信