{"title":"在下一次危机之前重塑投资者与国家之间的争端解决方式","authors":"Magdalena Bas Vilizzio","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487872e.2023.23.17901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the midst of a legitimacy crisis in investor-State dispute settlement regime, COVID-19 syndemic may lead States to the perfect storm as a result of the enlargement of the national policy space in order to tackle health, social and economic impacts. Thus, this piece aims to identify measures adopted by Latin American States which may be challenged by foreign investors’ claims. It also addresses the protection of national policy space and argues that the roadmap for reshaping the regime should include the following options: 1) moratorium on pending disputes and restriction on future claims related to Covid-19 measures;2) introduction of counterclaims as a general rule; 3) reference to right to regulate in investment agreements; 4) exclusion of protected areas or policies.","PeriodicalId":41335,"journal":{"name":"Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reshaping Investor-State Dispute Settlement Before the Next Syndemic\",\"authors\":\"Magdalena Bas Vilizzio\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/iij.24487872e.2023.23.17901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the midst of a legitimacy crisis in investor-State dispute settlement regime, COVID-19 syndemic may lead States to the perfect storm as a result of the enlargement of the national policy space in order to tackle health, social and economic impacts. Thus, this piece aims to identify measures adopted by Latin American States which may be challenged by foreign investors’ claims. It also addresses the protection of national policy space and argues that the roadmap for reshaping the regime should include the following options: 1) moratorium on pending disputes and restriction on future claims related to Covid-19 measures;2) introduction of counterclaims as a general rule; 3) reference to right to regulate in investment agreements; 4) exclusion of protected areas or policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487872e.2023.23.17901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487872e.2023.23.17901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reshaping Investor-State Dispute Settlement Before the Next Syndemic
In the midst of a legitimacy crisis in investor-State dispute settlement regime, COVID-19 syndemic may lead States to the perfect storm as a result of the enlargement of the national policy space in order to tackle health, social and economic impacts. Thus, this piece aims to identify measures adopted by Latin American States which may be challenged by foreign investors’ claims. It also addresses the protection of national policy space and argues that the roadmap for reshaping the regime should include the following options: 1) moratorium on pending disputes and restriction on future claims related to Covid-19 measures;2) introduction of counterclaims as a general rule; 3) reference to right to regulate in investment agreements; 4) exclusion of protected areas or policies.
期刊介绍:
El Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional (AMDI) surgió en el año 2000, como una publicación del Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM. El objetivo del AMDI es buscar la participación activa de juristas dedicados al estudio del Derecho Internacional para que colaboren tanto en lo relativo a la labor editorial como en la publicación de trabajos académicos. Esta apertura la constituye el hecho de que el Comité Editorial está compuesto por personajes de las más diversas instituciones y nacionalidades. Resulta importante mencionar que el AMDI busca mantener la calidad que siempre le ha caracterizado y para ello cuenta con una política de dobles dictámenes anónimos de alto rigor académico, realizados por la cartera de árbitros que constituyen el Consejo Editorial, el Consejo Dictaminador de Colaboraciones y en ocasiones algunos expertos externos. El AMDI suscribe el Código de Ética del IIJ-UNAM. El AMDI es una publicación de acceso abierto. Los idiomas para publicar contribuciones son en: español, inglés, portugués, francés e italiano. Las secciones del AMDI son: doctrina (artículos académicos), comentarios, reseñas, práctica internacional mexicana, jurisprudencia, coyuntura internacional y polémica. El AMDI cuenta con una software antiplagio para el proceso de revisión de las contribuciones recibidas.