社会底层挖掘与组织承诺的三种形式

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
E. Jing, Ian R. Gellatly, Justin R. Feeney, Michelle Inness
{"title":"社会底层挖掘与组织承诺的三种形式","authors":"E. Jing, Ian R. Gellatly, Justin R. Feeney, Michelle Inness","doi":"10.1027/1866-5888/a000307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In this study, we set out to challenge the widely held belief that mistreatment will always lower feelings of organizational commitment. We test this widespread belief by examining the relationship between social undermining (SU) and three forms of organizational commitment, affective, normative, and continuance commitment. Using time-lagged data provided by an online panel of 626 working adults, we found that exposure to SU lowered reported levels of affective (emotion-based) and normative (obligation-based) commitment but increased the level of continuance (economic-based) commitment. Subsequent moderated regression analyses revealed that the negative relations between SU and both affective and normative commitment were nuanced – they were both stronger for individuals whose anxious attachment was low rather than high. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personnel Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Undermining and Three Forms of Organizational Commitment\",\"authors\":\"E. Jing, Ian R. Gellatly, Justin R. Feeney, Michelle Inness\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/1866-5888/a000307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. In this study, we set out to challenge the widely held belief that mistreatment will always lower feelings of organizational commitment. We test this widespread belief by examining the relationship between social undermining (SU) and three forms of organizational commitment, affective, normative, and continuance commitment. Using time-lagged data provided by an online panel of 626 working adults, we found that exposure to SU lowered reported levels of affective (emotion-based) and normative (obligation-based) commitment but increased the level of continuance (economic-based) commitment. Subsequent moderated regression analyses revealed that the negative relations between SU and both affective and normative commitment were nuanced – they were both stronger for individuals whose anxious attachment was low rather than high. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personnel Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personnel Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000307\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personnel Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000307","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在这项研究中,我们开始挑战人们普遍认为的虐待总是会降低组织承诺感的观点。我们通过研究社会破坏(SU)与三种形式的组织承诺(情感承诺、规范承诺和持续承诺)之间的关系来检验这种普遍的信念。使用由626名在职成年人组成的在线小组提供的时滞数据,我们发现暴露于SU降低了情感(基于情绪)和规范(基于义务)承诺的报告水平,但增加了持续(基于经济)承诺的水平。随后的适度回归分析显示,SU与情感承诺和规范承诺之间的负面关系是微妙的——对于焦虑依恋较低而非较高的个体来说,它们都更为强烈。讨论了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Undermining and Three Forms of Organizational Commitment
Abstract. In this study, we set out to challenge the widely held belief that mistreatment will always lower feelings of organizational commitment. We test this widespread belief by examining the relationship between social undermining (SU) and three forms of organizational commitment, affective, normative, and continuance commitment. Using time-lagged data provided by an online panel of 626 working adults, we found that exposure to SU lowered reported levels of affective (emotion-based) and normative (obligation-based) commitment but increased the level of continuance (economic-based) commitment. Subsequent moderated regression analyses revealed that the negative relations between SU and both affective and normative commitment were nuanced – they were both stronger for individuals whose anxious attachment was low rather than high. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personnel Psychology
Journal of Personnel Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信