法律多元主义的运用与滥用:一个旁观者的视角

IF 0.8 3区社会学 Q1 HISTORY

Law and History Review Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1017/s0738248023000160

T. Herzog

{"title":"法律多元主义的运用与滥用:一个旁观者的视角","authors":"T. Herzog","doi":"10.1017/s0738248023000160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This text takes issue with how present day debates regarding legal pluralism affect our vision of the past, as well as limit the horizons of possibilities in the future. It suggests that the genealogy of these debates determined what would be seen, and what ignored, and that, as a result, it has privileged some aspects, while forgetting the importance of others.","PeriodicalId":17960,"journal":{"name":"Law and History Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Uses and Abuses of Legal Pluralism: A View from the Sideline\",\"authors\":\"T. Herzog\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0738248023000160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This text takes issue with how present day debates regarding legal pluralism affect our vision of the past, as well as limit the horizons of possibilities in the future. It suggests that the genealogy of these debates determined what would be seen, and what ignored, and that, as a result, it has privileged some aspects, while forgetting the importance of others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law and History Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law and History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0738248023000160\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0738248023000160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对目前关于法律多元化的辩论如何影响我们对过去的看法以及限制未来可能性的视野提出了质疑。它表明，这些争论的谱系决定了什么会被看到，什么会被忽略，因此，它优待了某些方面，而忘记了其他方面的重要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Uses and Abuses of Legal Pluralism: A View from the Sideline

This text takes issue with how present day debates regarding legal pluralism affect our vision of the past, as well as limit the horizons of possibilities in the future. It suggests that the genealogy of these debates determined what would be seen, and what ignored, and that, as a result, it has privileged some aspects, while forgetting the importance of others.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Law and History Review Multiple-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Law and History Review (LHR), America"s leading legal history journal, encompasses American, European, and ancient legal history issues. The journal"s purpose is to further research in the fields of the social history of law and the history of legal ideas and institutions. LHR features articles, essays, commentaries by international authorities, and reviews of important books on legal history. American Society for Legal History