艺术接受的社会决定因素。在审美倾向与态度多元化之间

Q3 Social Sciences
Michał Cebula
{"title":"艺术接受的社会决定因素。在审美倾向与态度多元化之间","authors":"Michał Cebula","doi":"10.24425/122466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pierre Bourdieu has been a prominent fi gure not only in the sociology of art and culture but also in sociology at large. His concepts have been widely debated and have helped to generate a number of empirical and theoretical interventions in the discipline. However, his legacy has been debated and subject to greater or lesser modifi cations. Following the new lines of research, the article assesses to what extent Bourdieu’s claims about differentiation of art audience, aesthetic disposition and art competence are still relevant and to what extent they need to be modifi ed in the context of contemporary aesthetic change. Drawing on a study of cultural participation and preferences of the inhabitants of a large city, the analysis demonstrates the aesthetic dimensions and attitudes that are active in art contemplation. Different dispositional confi gurations are found, some of which (as the “postmodern” one) have not been recognized in Bourdieu’s account. Other fi ndings corroborate the premise that art reception and knowledge are linked to class position and vary by stock of assets, including social capital and individual networks.","PeriodicalId":22027,"journal":{"name":"Studia Socjologiczne","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Społeczne uwarunkowania odbioru sztuki. Pomiędzy dyspozycją estetyczną a pluralizmem nastawień\",\"authors\":\"Michał Cebula\",\"doi\":\"10.24425/122466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pierre Bourdieu has been a prominent fi gure not only in the sociology of art and culture but also in sociology at large. His concepts have been widely debated and have helped to generate a number of empirical and theoretical interventions in the discipline. However, his legacy has been debated and subject to greater or lesser modifi cations. Following the new lines of research, the article assesses to what extent Bourdieu’s claims about differentiation of art audience, aesthetic disposition and art competence are still relevant and to what extent they need to be modifi ed in the context of contemporary aesthetic change. Drawing on a study of cultural participation and preferences of the inhabitants of a large city, the analysis demonstrates the aesthetic dimensions and attitudes that are active in art contemplation. Different dispositional confi gurations are found, some of which (as the “postmodern” one) have not been recognized in Bourdieu’s account. Other fi ndings corroborate the premise that art reception and knowledge are linked to class position and vary by stock of assets, including social capital and individual networks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Socjologiczne\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Socjologiczne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24425/122466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Socjologiczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/122466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

皮埃尔·布迪厄不仅在艺术和文化社会学领域,而且在整个社会学领域都是一位杰出的人物。他的概念引起了广泛的争论,并有助于在该学科中产生一些经验和理论干预。然而,他的遗产一直备受争议,并受到或多或少的修改。按照新的研究思路,本文评估了布迪厄关于艺术受众、审美倾向和艺术能力的差异的主张在多大程度上仍然相关,以及在当代审美变化的背景下需要在多大程度上进行修改。通过对一个大城市居民的文化参与和偏好的研究,分析表明了艺术沉思中活跃的审美维度和态度。发现了不同的配置配置,其中一些(作为“后现代”的)没有在布迪厄的描述中得到承认。其他研究结果证实了这一前提,即艺术接受和知识与阶级地位有关,并因资产存量而异,包括社会资本和个人网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Społeczne uwarunkowania odbioru sztuki. Pomiędzy dyspozycją estetyczną a pluralizmem nastawień
Pierre Bourdieu has been a prominent fi gure not only in the sociology of art and culture but also in sociology at large. His concepts have been widely debated and have helped to generate a number of empirical and theoretical interventions in the discipline. However, his legacy has been debated and subject to greater or lesser modifi cations. Following the new lines of research, the article assesses to what extent Bourdieu’s claims about differentiation of art audience, aesthetic disposition and art competence are still relevant and to what extent they need to be modifi ed in the context of contemporary aesthetic change. Drawing on a study of cultural participation and preferences of the inhabitants of a large city, the analysis demonstrates the aesthetic dimensions and attitudes that are active in art contemplation. Different dispositional confi gurations are found, some of which (as the “postmodern” one) have not been recognized in Bourdieu’s account. Other fi ndings corroborate the premise that art reception and knowledge are linked to class position and vary by stock of assets, including social capital and individual networks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Socjologiczne
Studia Socjologiczne Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信