临时工中介,“借壳”雇佣,以及不自由劳动力的蔓延

IF 0.6 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Gretchen Purser
{"title":"临时工中介,“借壳”雇佣,以及不自由劳动力的蔓延","authors":"Gretchen Purser","doi":"10.1111/awr.12158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article focuses upon a previously overlooked aspect of the “flesh-peddling” day labor business, widely recognized as the epitome of the precarious regime of employment. By physically stockpiling surplus labor to meet their clients’ immediate and unpredictable demands, day labor agencies inadvertently give rise to informal day labor markets outside their doors. Drawing upon ethnographic research carried out in the day labor agencies of Baltimore and Oakland, I examine how day laborers and agency dispatchers negotiate and navigate the practice of what I call “backdoor” hiring, wherein employers hire workers from, but not through, the agency. The struggles surrounding backdoor hiring not only challenge and complicate the binary division in the literature between formal and informal day labor, but reveal the dogged efforts of dispatchers to cultivate workers’ dependency, restrict their mobility, and curtail their labor-market freedom. This article thus contributes to the growing debate within anthropology and related disciplines about the conditions exacerbating unfreedom at the bottom of the labor market.</p>","PeriodicalId":43035,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology of Work Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/awr.12158","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Day Labor Agencies, “Backdoor” Hires, and the Spread of Unfree Labor\",\"authors\":\"Gretchen Purser\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/awr.12158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article focuses upon a previously overlooked aspect of the “flesh-peddling” day labor business, widely recognized as the epitome of the precarious regime of employment. By physically stockpiling surplus labor to meet their clients’ immediate and unpredictable demands, day labor agencies inadvertently give rise to informal day labor markets outside their doors. Drawing upon ethnographic research carried out in the day labor agencies of Baltimore and Oakland, I examine how day laborers and agency dispatchers negotiate and navigate the practice of what I call “backdoor” hiring, wherein employers hire workers from, but not through, the agency. The struggles surrounding backdoor hiring not only challenge and complicate the binary division in the literature between formal and informal day labor, but reveal the dogged efforts of dispatchers to cultivate workers’ dependency, restrict their mobility, and curtail their labor-market freedom. This article thus contributes to the growing debate within anthropology and related disciplines about the conditions exacerbating unfreedom at the bottom of the labor market.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology of Work Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/awr.12158\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology of Work Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/awr.12158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology of Work Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/awr.12158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文关注的是以前被忽视的“肉贩子”日工业务的一个方面,它被广泛认为是不稳定就业制度的缩影。通过实际储备剩余劳动力来满足客户即时和不可预测的需求,日工中介无意中在他们的门外产生了非正式的日工市场。根据在巴尔的摩和奥克兰的临时工中介机构进行的人种学研究,我研究了临时工和中介派遣员如何谈判和驾驭我称之为“后门”招聘的做法,即雇主从中介机构雇佣工人,而不是通过中介。围绕借壳雇佣的斗争不仅挑战和复杂化了文献中正式和非正式日工之间的二元划分,而且揭示了派遣者在培养工人的依赖性、限制他们的流动性和限制他们的劳动力市场自由方面所做的不懈努力。因此,这篇文章有助于在人类学和相关学科中关于加剧劳动力市场底层不自由的条件的日益激烈的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Day Labor Agencies, “Backdoor” Hires, and the Spread of Unfree Labor

This article focuses upon a previously overlooked aspect of the “flesh-peddling” day labor business, widely recognized as the epitome of the precarious regime of employment. By physically stockpiling surplus labor to meet their clients’ immediate and unpredictable demands, day labor agencies inadvertently give rise to informal day labor markets outside their doors. Drawing upon ethnographic research carried out in the day labor agencies of Baltimore and Oakland, I examine how day laborers and agency dispatchers negotiate and navigate the practice of what I call “backdoor” hiring, wherein employers hire workers from, but not through, the agency. The struggles surrounding backdoor hiring not only challenge and complicate the binary division in the literature between formal and informal day labor, but reveal the dogged efforts of dispatchers to cultivate workers’ dependency, restrict their mobility, and curtail their labor-market freedom. This article thus contributes to the growing debate within anthropology and related disciplines about the conditions exacerbating unfreedom at the bottom of the labor market.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信