18世纪蒙古的法律正义:满蒙婚姻联盟中的性别、民族与政治

IF 0.6 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Yue Du
{"title":"18世纪蒙古的法律正义:满蒙婚姻联盟中的性别、民族与政治","authors":"Yue Du","doi":"10.1353/LATE.2016.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rule of the Qing Empire (1644–1911) over its “outer territories” in East and Inner Asia (Mongolia, Manchuria, Xinjiang, and Tibet) has received considerable scholarly attention since the 1990s. Historians have suggested that in Mongolia, as well as in Xinjiang and Tibet, the Qing managed to establish and maintain an efficient administration that played a more crucial role than military power, at least since the second half of the eighteenth century. The Qing eventually transformed the jimi, or “loose reign” system, an indirect form of central control over “barbarian” client states along the imperial borders in the traditional Chinese tributary system, to a more direct administrative structure accompanied by military occupation.1 With regard to legal order in Mongolia under Qing rule, previous scholarship has proposed that, unlike their counterparts in colonies controlled by European powers, Mongolian local banner princes (jasags) held a recognized position in the official hierarchy of Qing judicial-administration in Mongolia. They served as judicial authorities on a local level, but they were incorporated into the Qing imperial judicial-administrative system rather than","PeriodicalId":43948,"journal":{"name":"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA","volume":"37 1","pages":"1 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/LATE.2016.0010","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Justice in Eighteenth-Century Mongolia: Gender, Ethnicity, and Politics in the Manchu-Mongol Marriage Alliance\",\"authors\":\"Yue Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/LATE.2016.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rule of the Qing Empire (1644–1911) over its “outer territories” in East and Inner Asia (Mongolia, Manchuria, Xinjiang, and Tibet) has received considerable scholarly attention since the 1990s. Historians have suggested that in Mongolia, as well as in Xinjiang and Tibet, the Qing managed to establish and maintain an efficient administration that played a more crucial role than military power, at least since the second half of the eighteenth century. The Qing eventually transformed the jimi, or “loose reign” system, an indirect form of central control over “barbarian” client states along the imperial borders in the traditional Chinese tributary system, to a more direct administrative structure accompanied by military occupation.1 With regard to legal order in Mongolia under Qing rule, previous scholarship has proposed that, unlike their counterparts in colonies controlled by European powers, Mongolian local banner princes (jasags) held a recognized position in the official hierarchy of Qing judicial-administration in Mongolia. They served as judicial authorities on a local level, but they were incorporated into the Qing imperial judicial-administrative system rather than\",\"PeriodicalId\":43948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/LATE.2016.0010\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/LATE.2016.0010\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LATE IMPERIAL CHINA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/LATE.2016.0010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自20世纪90年代以来,清帝国(1644–1911)对东亚和中亚“外域”(蒙古、满洲、新疆和西藏)的统治受到了学术界的广泛关注。历史学家认为,至少自18世纪下半叶以来,在蒙古、新疆和西藏,清朝成功地建立并维持了一个比军事力量更重要的高效行政机构。清朝最终将吉米制度(即“宽松统治”制度)转变为伴随军事占领的更直接的行政结构。吉米制度是中国传统朝贡制度中对帝国边界“野蛮”附属国的间接中央控制形式。1关于清朝统治下蒙古的法律秩序,先前的学者曾提出,与欧洲列强控制的殖民地中的贵族不同,蒙古地方旗王公(jasags)在蒙古清朝司法行政的官方等级中占有公认的地位。他们在地方一级担任司法机关,但他们被纳入了清朝的司法行政系统,而不是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Justice in Eighteenth-Century Mongolia: Gender, Ethnicity, and Politics in the Manchu-Mongol Marriage Alliance
The rule of the Qing Empire (1644–1911) over its “outer territories” in East and Inner Asia (Mongolia, Manchuria, Xinjiang, and Tibet) has received considerable scholarly attention since the 1990s. Historians have suggested that in Mongolia, as well as in Xinjiang and Tibet, the Qing managed to establish and maintain an efficient administration that played a more crucial role than military power, at least since the second half of the eighteenth century. The Qing eventually transformed the jimi, or “loose reign” system, an indirect form of central control over “barbarian” client states along the imperial borders in the traditional Chinese tributary system, to a more direct administrative structure accompanied by military occupation.1 With regard to legal order in Mongolia under Qing rule, previous scholarship has proposed that, unlike their counterparts in colonies controlled by European powers, Mongolian local banner princes (jasags) held a recognized position in the official hierarchy of Qing judicial-administration in Mongolia. They served as judicial authorities on a local level, but they were incorporated into the Qing imperial judicial-administrative system rather than
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信