红龙果分级的分类比较

Z. E. Fitri, Ari Baskara, Abdul Madjid, A. M. N. Imron
{"title":"红龙果分级的分类比较","authors":"Z. E. Fitri, Ari Baskara, Abdul Madjid, A. M. N. Imron","doi":"10.25077/jnte.v11n1.899.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pitaya is another name for dragon fruit which is currently a popular fruit, especially in Indonesia. One of the problems related to determining the quality of dragon fruit is the postharvest sorting and grading process. In general, farmers determine the grading system by measuring the weight or just looking at the size of the fruit, of course, this raises differences in grading perceptions so that it is not by SNI. This research is a development of previous research, but we changed the type of dragon fruit from white dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus) to red dragon fruit (Hylocereus costaricensis). We also adapted the image processing and classification methods in previous studies and then compared them with other classification methods. The number of images in the training data is 216, and the number of images in the testing data is 75. The comparison of the accuracy of the three classification methods is 84% for the KNN method, 85.33% for the Naive Bayes method, and 86.67% for the Backpropagation method. So that the backpropagation method is the best classification method in classifying the quality grading of red dragon fruit. The network architecture used is 4, 8, 3 with a learning rate of 0.3 so that the training accuracy is 98.61% and the testing accuracy is 86.67%.","PeriodicalId":30660,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Classification for Grading Red Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus Costaricensis)\",\"authors\":\"Z. E. Fitri, Ari Baskara, Abdul Madjid, A. M. N. Imron\",\"doi\":\"10.25077/jnte.v11n1.899.2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pitaya is another name for dragon fruit which is currently a popular fruit, especially in Indonesia. One of the problems related to determining the quality of dragon fruit is the postharvest sorting and grading process. In general, farmers determine the grading system by measuring the weight or just looking at the size of the fruit, of course, this raises differences in grading perceptions so that it is not by SNI. This research is a development of previous research, but we changed the type of dragon fruit from white dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus) to red dragon fruit (Hylocereus costaricensis). We also adapted the image processing and classification methods in previous studies and then compared them with other classification methods. The number of images in the training data is 216, and the number of images in the testing data is 75. The comparison of the accuracy of the three classification methods is 84% for the KNN method, 85.33% for the Naive Bayes method, and 86.67% for the Backpropagation method. So that the backpropagation method is the best classification method in classifying the quality grading of red dragon fruit. The network architecture used is 4, 8, 3 with a learning rate of 0.3 so that the training accuracy is 98.61% and the testing accuracy is 86.67%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25077/jnte.v11n1.899.2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25077/jnte.v11n1.899.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

火龙果是火龙果的另一个名字,火龙果目前是一种受欢迎的水果,尤其是在印度尼西亚。与确定火龙果质量有关的问题之一是采后的分选和分级过程。一般来说,农民通过测量水果的重量或只看水果的大小来确定分级系统,当然,这会增加分级观念的差异,因此不是通过SNI。这项研究是对以往研究的发展,但我们将火龙果的类型从白龙果改为红龙果。我们还对先前研究中的图像处理和分类方法进行了调整,然后将其与其他分类方法进行比较。训练数据中的图像数量为216,测试数据中的图片数量为75。KNN方法、Naive Bayes方法和Backpropagation方法的三种分类方法的准确率比较分别为84%、85.33%和86.67%。因此,反向传播法是对红龙果品质分级的最佳分类方法。使用的网络架构为4、8、3,学习率为0.3,因此训练准确率为98.61%,测试准确率为86.67%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Classification for Grading Red Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus Costaricensis)
Pitaya is another name for dragon fruit which is currently a popular fruit, especially in Indonesia. One of the problems related to determining the quality of dragon fruit is the postharvest sorting and grading process. In general, farmers determine the grading system by measuring the weight or just looking at the size of the fruit, of course, this raises differences in grading perceptions so that it is not by SNI. This research is a development of previous research, but we changed the type of dragon fruit from white dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus) to red dragon fruit (Hylocereus costaricensis). We also adapted the image processing and classification methods in previous studies and then compared them with other classification methods. The number of images in the training data is 216, and the number of images in the testing data is 75. The comparison of the accuracy of the three classification methods is 84% for the KNN method, 85.33% for the Naive Bayes method, and 86.67% for the Backpropagation method. So that the backpropagation method is the best classification method in classifying the quality grading of red dragon fruit. The network architecture used is 4, 8, 3 with a learning rate of 0.3 so that the training accuracy is 98.61% and the testing accuracy is 86.67%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信