对象安全性的分歧共识

IF 0.6 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
L. Lopriore
{"title":"对象安全性的分歧共识","authors":"L. Lopriore","doi":"10.1080/17445760.2023.2225217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a set of security mechanisms supporting a form of split consensus between subjects that grant permissions to exert rights to access objects, and subjects that hold these rights. Our solution is based on lock-key pairs. A key specifies a collection of access rights, and a category for each access right. For each category, a lock states whether an access right in that category is valid, or not. We illustrate a few examples of applications, including file security, a form of priority-based access control, access control lists, and capability lists supporting hierarchical object structures.","PeriodicalId":45411,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Parallel Emergent and Distributed Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Split consensus for object security\",\"authors\":\"L. Lopriore\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17445760.2023.2225217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a set of security mechanisms supporting a form of split consensus between subjects that grant permissions to exert rights to access objects, and subjects that hold these rights. Our solution is based on lock-key pairs. A key specifies a collection of access rights, and a category for each access right. For each category, a lock states whether an access right in that category is valid, or not. We illustrate a few examples of applications, including file security, a form of priority-based access control, access control lists, and capability lists supporting hierarchical object structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Parallel Emergent and Distributed Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Parallel Emergent and Distributed Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17445760.2023.2225217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Parallel Emergent and Distributed Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17445760.2023.2225217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了一组安全机制,支持授予访问对象的权限的主体和拥有这些权限的主体之间的一种分裂共识形式。我们的解决方案基于锁钥匙对。键指定访问权限的集合,以及每个访问权限的类别。对于每个类别,锁都会声明该类别中的访问权限是否有效。我们举例说明了一些应用程序,包括文件安全性、一种基于优先级的访问控制形式、访问控制列表和支持分层对象结构的功能列表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Split consensus for object security
We present a set of security mechanisms supporting a form of split consensus between subjects that grant permissions to exert rights to access objects, and subjects that hold these rights. Our solution is based on lock-key pairs. A key specifies a collection of access rights, and a category for each access right. For each category, a lock states whether an access right in that category is valid, or not. We illustrate a few examples of applications, including file security, a form of priority-based access control, access control lists, and capability lists supporting hierarchical object structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信