{"title":"关于社会研究中普通语言和社会学概念化交集的简要说明","authors":"M. Pitrone","doi":"10.4000/qds.2199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A brief reflection on the porous boundaries between ordinary language, common knowledge and scientific knowledge is presented, emphasizing the methodological impact of the process of concepts formation and the relevance of tacit knowledge both in everyday life and in scientific activity. By emphasizing the fluidity of concepts, its implications on the debate about indicators choice, question wording and the claim to standardize meanings in surveys are discussed.","PeriodicalId":55721,"journal":{"name":"Quaderni di Sociologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brevi note sull’intersezione tra linguaggio ordinario e concettualizzazione sociologica nella ricerca sociale\",\"authors\":\"M. Pitrone\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/qds.2199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A brief reflection on the porous boundaries between ordinary language, common knowledge and scientific knowledge is presented, emphasizing the methodological impact of the process of concepts formation and the relevance of tacit knowledge both in everyday life and in scientific activity. By emphasizing the fluidity of concepts, its implications on the debate about indicators choice, question wording and the claim to standardize meanings in surveys are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaderni di Sociologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaderni di Sociologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/qds.2199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaderni di Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/qds.2199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Brevi note sull’intersezione tra linguaggio ordinario e concettualizzazione sociologica nella ricerca sociale
A brief reflection on the porous boundaries between ordinary language, common knowledge and scientific knowledge is presented, emphasizing the methodological impact of the process of concepts formation and the relevance of tacit knowledge both in everyday life and in scientific activity. By emphasizing the fluidity of concepts, its implications on the debate about indicators choice, question wording and the claim to standardize meanings in surveys are discussed.