早期护理和教育危机:全球大流行中的矛盾时刻

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
I-Fang Lee
{"title":"早期护理和教育危机:全球大流行中的矛盾时刻","authors":"I-Fang Lee","doi":"10.1177/2043610620978491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Care in the early years entails more than childcare. This paper has three major sections. In the first section, I begin with an introduction and a quick overview of the ECEC system in Australia. This snapshot of the Australian ECEC system presents a messy map of the care and education system for young children under a neoliberal political economy to elucidate what this may mean in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. With this contextual background of the ECEC system in Australia, in the second section I discuss my theoretical, ethical, political, ontological, and epistemological positioning when re-imagining and reconceptualizing what a socially just ECEC landscape might look like through the lens of a feminism approach. This onto-epistemological discussion explains the shift toward a feminist approach and how this enables me to (re)think about care and education in the early years differently. Taking up this different set of analytical tools with a post-structural sensibility of the politics of caring, in the third section, I continue on to critical analyses and discussions, highlighting the paradoxes of care and education in the early years. A key aim of this paper is to un-settle the taken-for-granted ways of thinking and talking about ECEC in Australia. I build my discussions by unsettling the dominant ways of thinking about care and education in the early years to deconstruct the narrowed political rhetoric of care in the early years as childcare only. I assert such a critical analytical position requires a new language from a new onto-epistemological positioning to mobilize a different system of reasoning as a strategy for re-imagining a new landscape toward an ethical world with social justice and greater social inclusion for all children.","PeriodicalId":37143,"journal":{"name":"Global Studies of Childhood","volume":"10 1","pages":"385 - 394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2043610620978491","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crisis of care and education in the early years: Paradoxical moments in the global pandemic\",\"authors\":\"I-Fang Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2043610620978491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Care in the early years entails more than childcare. This paper has three major sections. In the first section, I begin with an introduction and a quick overview of the ECEC system in Australia. This snapshot of the Australian ECEC system presents a messy map of the care and education system for young children under a neoliberal political economy to elucidate what this may mean in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. With this contextual background of the ECEC system in Australia, in the second section I discuss my theoretical, ethical, political, ontological, and epistemological positioning when re-imagining and reconceptualizing what a socially just ECEC landscape might look like through the lens of a feminism approach. This onto-epistemological discussion explains the shift toward a feminist approach and how this enables me to (re)think about care and education in the early years differently. Taking up this different set of analytical tools with a post-structural sensibility of the politics of caring, in the third section, I continue on to critical analyses and discussions, highlighting the paradoxes of care and education in the early years. A key aim of this paper is to un-settle the taken-for-granted ways of thinking and talking about ECEC in Australia. I build my discussions by unsettling the dominant ways of thinking about care and education in the early years to deconstruct the narrowed political rhetoric of care in the early years as childcare only. I assert such a critical analytical position requires a new language from a new onto-epistemological positioning to mobilize a different system of reasoning as a strategy for re-imagining a new landscape toward an ethical world with social justice and greater social inclusion for all children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Studies of Childhood\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"385 - 394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2043610620978491\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Studies of Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610620978491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Studies of Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610620978491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

幼儿期的照料不仅仅需要儿童看护。本文主要分为三个部分。在第一部分中,我首先对澳大利亚的ECEC系统进行了介绍和快速概述。这张澳大利亚ECEC系统的快照展示了新自由主义政治经济下幼儿护理和教育系统的混乱地图,以阐明面对COVID-19大流行时这可能意味着什么。在澳大利亚ECEC系统的背景下,在第二部分中,我将讨论我的理论,伦理,政治,本体论和认识论定位,当通过女权主义方法的镜头重新想象和重新概念化社会公正的ECEC景观时。这种本体-认识论的讨论解释了向女权主义方法的转变,以及这如何使我(重新)以不同的方式思考早期的护理和教育。在第三部分中,我以一种对关怀政治的后结构敏感性来采用这一套不同的分析工具,继续进行批判性的分析和讨论,强调早期关怀和教育的悖论。本文的一个关键目的是打破澳大利亚对ECEC的想当然的思考和讨论方式。我的讨论是通过颠覆人们对儿童早期照料和教育的主流思维方式,来解构把儿童早期照料狭隘地视为儿童保育的政治修辞。我认为,这样一个批判性的分析立场需要一种新的语言,从一个新的本体-认识论的定位出发,调动一种不同的推理系统,作为一种战略,重新构想一个新的景观,走向一个社会正义的道德世界,为所有儿童提供更大的社会包容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crisis of care and education in the early years: Paradoxical moments in the global pandemic
Care in the early years entails more than childcare. This paper has three major sections. In the first section, I begin with an introduction and a quick overview of the ECEC system in Australia. This snapshot of the Australian ECEC system presents a messy map of the care and education system for young children under a neoliberal political economy to elucidate what this may mean in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. With this contextual background of the ECEC system in Australia, in the second section I discuss my theoretical, ethical, political, ontological, and epistemological positioning when re-imagining and reconceptualizing what a socially just ECEC landscape might look like through the lens of a feminism approach. This onto-epistemological discussion explains the shift toward a feminist approach and how this enables me to (re)think about care and education in the early years differently. Taking up this different set of analytical tools with a post-structural sensibility of the politics of caring, in the third section, I continue on to critical analyses and discussions, highlighting the paradoxes of care and education in the early years. A key aim of this paper is to un-settle the taken-for-granted ways of thinking and talking about ECEC in Australia. I build my discussions by unsettling the dominant ways of thinking about care and education in the early years to deconstruct the narrowed political rhetoric of care in the early years as childcare only. I assert such a critical analytical position requires a new language from a new onto-epistemological positioning to mobilize a different system of reasoning as a strategy for re-imagining a new landscape toward an ethical world with social justice and greater social inclusion for all children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Studies of Childhood
Global Studies of Childhood Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信