绩效评估动机量表的编制与验证

IF 2.9 4区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Human Performance Pub Date : 2020-05-26 DOI:10.1080/08959285.2020.1776713

Andrew B. Speer, Andrew P. Tenbrink, Michael G. Schwendeman

{"title":"绩效评估动机量表的编制与验证","authors":"Andrew B. Speer, Andrew P. Tenbrink, Michael G. Schwendeman","doi":"10.1080/08959285.2020.1776713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The current study investigated the effects of rater motivations on performance appraisals (PA). Despite rater motivations being important to PAs, there is no established and validated scale to measure rater motives. Within this study, a scale was developed to measure five rater motives. This scale, labeled the Performance Appraisal Motivation Scale (PAMS), was then examined for internal structure and validated using data from current managers. PAMS exhibited acceptable internal structure and displayed an expected pattern of relationships with individual difference variables, situational variables, other rater motives, and rating outcomes. Overall, results provide evidence in support of PAMS’ construct validity. The findings also help establish empirical linkages between rater motivations and important variables within the nomological network of rater motivation.","PeriodicalId":47825,"journal":{"name":"Human Performance","volume":"33 1","pages":"214 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08959285.2020.1776713","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creation and Validation of the Performance Appraisal Motivation Scale (PAMS)\",\"authors\":\"Andrew B. Speer, Andrew P. Tenbrink, Michael G. Schwendeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959285.2020.1776713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The current study investigated the effects of rater motivations on performance appraisals (PA). Despite rater motivations being important to PAs, there is no established and validated scale to measure rater motives. Within this study, a scale was developed to measure five rater motives. This scale, labeled the Performance Appraisal Motivation Scale (PAMS), was then examined for internal structure and validated using data from current managers. PAMS exhibited acceptable internal structure and displayed an expected pattern of relationships with individual difference variables, situational variables, other rater motives, and rating outcomes. Overall, results provide evidence in support of PAMS’ construct validity. The findings also help establish empirical linkages between rater motivations and important variables within the nomological network of rater motivation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Performance\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"214 - 240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08959285.2020.1776713\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2020.1776713\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2020.1776713","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要本研究调查了评分者动机对绩效评估（PA）的影响。尽管评分者动机对PA很重要，但没有建立和验证的量表来衡量评分者动机。在这项研究中，制定了一个量表来衡量五个评分者的动机。该量表被称为绩效评估动机量表（PAMS），随后对其内部结构进行了检查，并使用现任经理的数据进行了验证。PAMS表现出可接受的内部结构，并表现出与个体差异变量、情境变量、其他评分者动机和评分结果的预期关系模式。总体而言，研究结果为PAMS的结构有效性提供了支持。这些发现也有助于在评分者动机和评分者动机的法理网络中的重要变量之间建立经验联系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Creation and Validation of the Performance Appraisal Motivation Scale (PAMS)

ABSTRACT The current study investigated the effects of rater motivations on performance appraisals (PA). Despite rater motivations being important to PAs, there is no established and validated scale to measure rater motives. Within this study, a scale was developed to measure five rater motives. This scale, labeled the Performance Appraisal Motivation Scale (PAMS), was then examined for internal structure and validated using data from current managers. PAMS exhibited acceptable internal structure and displayed an expected pattern of relationships with individual difference variables, situational variables, other rater motives, and rating outcomes. Overall, results provide evidence in support of PAMS’ construct validity. The findings also help establish empirical linkages between rater motivations and important variables within the nomological network of rater motivation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Human Performance PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Human Performance publishes research investigating the nature and role of performance in the workplace and in organizational settings and offers a rich variety of information going beyond the study of traditional job behavior. Dedicated to presenting original research, theory, and measurement methods, the journal investigates individual, team, and firm level performance factors that influence work and organizational effectiveness. Human Performance is a respected forum for behavioral scientists interested in variables that motivate and promote high-level human performance, particularly in organizational and occupational settings. The journal seeks to identify and stimulate relevant research, communication, and theory concerning human capabilities and effectiveness. It serves as a valuable intellectual link between such disciplines as industrial-organizational psychology, individual differences, work physiology, organizational behavior, human resource management, and human factors.