2016年奥运会和残奥会:柔道比赛技战术分析

IF 0.9 4区医学 Q4 REHABILITATION

Kinesiology Pub Date : 2018-12-20 DOI:10.26582/K.50.2.7

R. Kons, J. N. N. S. Junior, Gabriela Fischer, D. Detanico

{"title":"2016年奥运会和残奥会:柔道比赛技战术分析","authors":"R. Kons, J. N. N. S. Junior, Gabriela Fischer, D. Detanico","doi":"10.26582/K.50.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to compare the athletes’ scores, penalties and efficiency between of the Olympic and Paralympic Games Rio 2016, and identify which variable determines the winner of the matches. A total of 608 matches in the Olympic and Paralympic Games were analysed. Total relative scores (ippon, wazari and yuko), penalties (shido per match) and efficiency were identified in the categories male and female, Olympic and Paralympic Games, and medallists and non-medallists. The main results showed that the wazari was higher in the Olympic Games (p = 0.05) than in the Paralympic Games (male team); the ippon was higher in the Paralympic Games (p = 0.05) and the shido was higher in the Olympic Games (p = 0.05) (female team). The male Olympic medallists were more efficient (p = 0.01), while the female Paralympic medallists were less punished (p = 0.01). The ippon was the key variable that determined winning in both Olympic and Paralympic matches (p < 0.001). We concluded that male Olympic athletes showed greater efficiency and scores than Paralympians, while the female team presented more scores and fewer penalties. The ippon was the key point that determined victory in most of the matches.","PeriodicalId":49943,"journal":{"name":"Kinesiology","volume":"50 1","pages":"204-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.26582/K.50.2.7","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Olympic and Paralympic Games Rio 2016: A technical-tactical analysis of judo matches\",\"authors\":\"R. Kons, J. N. N. S. Junior, Gabriela Fischer, D. Detanico\",\"doi\":\"10.26582/K.50.2.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to compare the athletes’ scores, penalties and efficiency between of the Olympic and Paralympic Games Rio 2016, and identify which variable determines the winner of the matches. A total of 608 matches in the Olympic and Paralympic Games were analysed. Total relative scores (ippon, wazari and yuko), penalties (shido per match) and efficiency were identified in the categories male and female, Olympic and Paralympic Games, and medallists and non-medallists. The main results showed that the wazari was higher in the Olympic Games (p = 0.05) than in the Paralympic Games (male team); the ippon was higher in the Paralympic Games (p = 0.05) and the shido was higher in the Olympic Games (p = 0.05) (female team). The male Olympic medallists were more efficient (p = 0.01), while the female Paralympic medallists were less punished (p = 0.01). The ippon was the key variable that determined winning in both Olympic and Paralympic matches (p < 0.001). We concluded that male Olympic athletes showed greater efficiency and scores than Paralympians, while the female team presented more scores and fewer penalties. The ippon was the key point that determined victory in most of the matches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"204-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.26582/K.50.2.7\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26582/K.50.2.7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26582/K.50.2.7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

摘要

本研究的目的是比较2016年里约奥运会和残奥会运动员的得分、点球和效率，并确定哪个变量决定比赛的获胜者。对奥运会和残奥会的608场比赛进行了分析。在男子和女子、奥运会和残奥会、奖牌获得者和非奖牌获得者类别中确定了相对总分（ippon、wazari和yuko）、点球（每场比赛的shido）和效率。主要结果显示，奥运会的瓦扎里比残奥会（男队）高（p=0.05）；ippon在残奥会中较高（p=0.05），shido在奥运会中较高（p=0.05）（女队）。奥运会男性奖牌获得者的效率更高（p=0.01），而残奥会女性奖牌获得者受到的惩罚更少（p=01）。ippon是决定奥运会和残奥会比赛获胜的关键变量（p<0.001）。我们得出结论，奥运会男性运动员比残奥会运动员表现出更高的效率和分数，而女队则表现出更多的分数和更少的处罚。ippon是决定大多数比赛胜利的关键点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Olympic and Paralympic Games Rio 2016: A technical-tactical analysis of judo matches

The purpose of this study is to compare the athletes’ scores, penalties and efficiency between of the Olympic and Paralympic Games Rio 2016, and identify which variable determines the winner of the matches. A total of 608 matches in the Olympic and Paralympic Games were analysed. Total relative scores (ippon, wazari and yuko), penalties (shido per match) and efficiency were identified in the categories male and female, Olympic and Paralympic Games, and medallists and non-medallists. The main results showed that the wazari was higher in the Olympic Games (p = 0.05) than in the Paralympic Games (male team); the ippon was higher in the Paralympic Games (p = 0.05) and the shido was higher in the Olympic Games (p = 0.05) (female team). The male Olympic medallists were more efficient (p = 0.01), while the female Paralympic medallists were less punished (p = 0.01). The ippon was the key variable that determined winning in both Olympic and Paralympic matches (p < 0.001). We concluded that male Olympic athletes showed greater efficiency and scores than Paralympians, while the female team presented more scores and fewer penalties. The ippon was the key point that determined victory in most of the matches.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Kinesiology REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

8.30%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Kinesiology – International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Kinesiology (print ISSN 1331- 1441, online ISSN 1848-638X) publishes twice a year scientific papers and other written material from kinesiology (a scientific discipline which investigates art and science of human movement; in the meaning and scope close to the idiom “sport sciences”) and other adjacent human sciences focused on sport and exercise, primarily from anthropology (biological and cultural alike), medicine, sociology, psychology, natural sciences and mathematics applied to sport in its broadest sense, history, and others. Contributions of high scientific interest, including also results of theoretical analyses and their practical application in physical education, sport, physical recreation and kinesitherapy, are accepted for publication. The following sections define the scope of the journal: Sport and sports activities, Physical education, Recreation/leisure, Kinesiological anthropology, Training methods, Biology of sport and exercise, Sports medicine and physiology of sport, Biomechanics, History of sport and Book reviews with news.