介绍

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW
E. Üstün
{"title":"介绍","authors":"E. Üstün","doi":"10.1017/S0021855300012651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The story of the way in which the Codes of Criminal Law and Procedure were introduced in British colonial Africa is indeed a fascinating one. As Dr. Morris observes in his article, by 1935 almost the whole of these territories had developed a body of criminal law and procedure which was virtually common throughout the area, and this was to be inherited by the independent governments a quarter of a century later. But this degree of uniform codification was not achieved without difficulty and in some cases strong objection from the local bar and business interests, who feared a loss of liberty under a new written law, and preferred the English common law \"with all its forms, solemnities and technicalities\", because they felt safe under it. At the Colonial Office there was some opposition to codification based on the model of the Indian Penal Codes, and although in East Africa the Indian Codes had been introduced at an early period, these Codes encountered hostility from the white settlers as well as the officials at the Colonial Office, and eventually were replaced by Codes originally drafted more along the lines of the Nigerian model, but later adapted to meet the criticisms of the law officers of those territories. There were differences in Nyasaland and Northern Rhodesia, and Zanzibar had the Indian Codes until 1935 but they all eventually were brought more or less in line. In the Gambia, there was resistance to replacing the English common law by Code, although why anyone should wish to cling to \"this dizzying mosaic\" baffled the Legal Adviser. Eventually the Codes were pushed through, modelled on the Kenya Code of 1930. Only the Gold Coast then had a differently based Code, which had been adopted in 1892, and was based on the Criminal Code of St. Lucia. The position of Botswana is however different, for, as Mr. Brewer shows, it depends in part on the reception of the Roman-Dutch criminal law, in part on the English common law, and in part on customary law. The problems this poses for Botswana today are clearly described by Mr. Brewer.","PeriodicalId":44630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Law","volume":"18 1","pages":"3 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0021855300012651","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction\",\"authors\":\"E. Üstün\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0021855300012651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The story of the way in which the Codes of Criminal Law and Procedure were introduced in British colonial Africa is indeed a fascinating one. As Dr. Morris observes in his article, by 1935 almost the whole of these territories had developed a body of criminal law and procedure which was virtually common throughout the area, and this was to be inherited by the independent governments a quarter of a century later. But this degree of uniform codification was not achieved without difficulty and in some cases strong objection from the local bar and business interests, who feared a loss of liberty under a new written law, and preferred the English common law \\\"with all its forms, solemnities and technicalities\\\", because they felt safe under it. At the Colonial Office there was some opposition to codification based on the model of the Indian Penal Codes, and although in East Africa the Indian Codes had been introduced at an early period, these Codes encountered hostility from the white settlers as well as the officials at the Colonial Office, and eventually were replaced by Codes originally drafted more along the lines of the Nigerian model, but later adapted to meet the criticisms of the law officers of those territories. There were differences in Nyasaland and Northern Rhodesia, and Zanzibar had the Indian Codes until 1935 but they all eventually were brought more or less in line. In the Gambia, there was resistance to replacing the English common law by Code, although why anyone should wish to cling to \\\"this dizzying mosaic\\\" baffled the Legal Adviser. Eventually the Codes were pushed through, modelled on the Kenya Code of 1930. Only the Gold Coast then had a differently based Code, which had been adopted in 1892, and was based on the Criminal Code of St. Lucia. The position of Botswana is however different, for, as Mr. Brewer shows, it depends in part on the reception of the Roman-Dutch criminal law, in part on the English common law, and in part on customary law. The problems this poses for Botswana today are clearly described by Mr. Brewer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of African Law\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0021855300012651\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of African Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855300012651\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855300012651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国殖民地非洲引入《刑法和诉讼法》的方式确实是一个引人入胜的故事。正如Morris博士在文章中指出的那样,到1935年,几乎所有这些地区都制定了一套几乎在整个地区都很常见的刑法和程序,四分之一个世纪后,独立政府将继承这一体系。但是,实现这种程度的统一编纂并非没有困难,在某些情况下,当地律师和商业利益集团强烈反对,他们担心在新的成文法下会失去自由,并更喜欢英国普通法“及其所有形式、严肃性和技术性”,因为他们觉得在它之下是安全的。在殖民地办事处,有人反对根据《印度刑法典》模式进行编纂,尽管在东非,《印度刑典》很早就出台了,但这些法典遭到了白人定居者以及殖民地办事处官员的敌意,最终被最初更像尼日利亚模式起草的法典所取代,但后来为了应对这些地区法律官员的批评而进行了调整。尼亚萨兰和北罗得西亚存在差异,桑给巴尔在1935年之前一直有印度法典,但它们最终都或多或少地保持了一致。在冈比亚,有人反对用《法典》取代英国普通法,尽管法律顾问感到困惑的是,为什么有人希望坚持“这幅令人眼花缭乱的马赛克”。最终,以1930年《肯尼亚法典》为蓝本,《法典》得以通过。当时只有黄金海岸有一个不同的法典,该法典于1892年通过,以圣卢西亚刑法为基础。然而,博茨瓦纳的立场不同,因为正如布鲁尔先生所表明的那样,它部分取决于对罗马-荷兰刑法的接受,部分取决于英国普通法,以及部分取决于习惯法。布鲁尔先生清楚地描述了这给博茨瓦纳今天带来的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction
The story of the way in which the Codes of Criminal Law and Procedure were introduced in British colonial Africa is indeed a fascinating one. As Dr. Morris observes in his article, by 1935 almost the whole of these territories had developed a body of criminal law and procedure which was virtually common throughout the area, and this was to be inherited by the independent governments a quarter of a century later. But this degree of uniform codification was not achieved without difficulty and in some cases strong objection from the local bar and business interests, who feared a loss of liberty under a new written law, and preferred the English common law "with all its forms, solemnities and technicalities", because they felt safe under it. At the Colonial Office there was some opposition to codification based on the model of the Indian Penal Codes, and although in East Africa the Indian Codes had been introduced at an early period, these Codes encountered hostility from the white settlers as well as the officials at the Colonial Office, and eventually were replaced by Codes originally drafted more along the lines of the Nigerian model, but later adapted to meet the criticisms of the law officers of those territories. There were differences in Nyasaland and Northern Rhodesia, and Zanzibar had the Indian Codes until 1935 but they all eventually were brought more or less in line. In the Gambia, there was resistance to replacing the English common law by Code, although why anyone should wish to cling to "this dizzying mosaic" baffled the Legal Adviser. Eventually the Codes were pushed through, modelled on the Kenya Code of 1930. Only the Gold Coast then had a differently based Code, which had been adopted in 1892, and was based on the Criminal Code of St. Lucia. The position of Botswana is however different, for, as Mr. Brewer shows, it depends in part on the reception of the Roman-Dutch criminal law, in part on the English common law, and in part on customary law. The problems this poses for Botswana today are clearly described by Mr. Brewer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信