前座外支架压边力控制失效研究

Q3 Engineering
Rofan Yulian Romansyah, Hanif Azis Budiarto, Yuliar Yasin Erlangga, Yunita Nugrahaini Safrudin
{"title":"前座外支架压边力控制失效研究","authors":"Rofan Yulian Romansyah, Hanif Azis Budiarto, Yuliar Yasin Erlangga, Yunita Nugrahaini Safrudin","doi":"10.37385/jaets.v4i2.1779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the failure of the Blank Holder Force (BHF) control in the outside bracket for the front seat. The production process involved progressive dies consisting of nine stations: first pierce, first trim, second trim, idle, flange, idle, second pierce, idle, and parting. However, at the 7th-9th station, the pilot hole in the product deforms into an oval shape, which is undesirable. Gemba-Kaizen methods were used in this study, and primary data were collected by comparing the design and actual progressive dies. The results showed that product defects are primarily caused by an unbalanced BHF and inadequate piercing clearance. A uniform distribution of force during the forming process is obtained by reducing the spring number on the blank holder. This reduces the force generated during the process. Furthermore, the die clearance was increased from 0.01 mm to 0.1 mm, making press and die alignment less critical and requiring less cutting and stripping forces","PeriodicalId":34350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failure Investigation of Blank Holder Force (BHF) Control in The Outside Bracket For Front Seat\",\"authors\":\"Rofan Yulian Romansyah, Hanif Azis Budiarto, Yuliar Yasin Erlangga, Yunita Nugrahaini Safrudin\",\"doi\":\"10.37385/jaets.v4i2.1779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated the failure of the Blank Holder Force (BHF) control in the outside bracket for the front seat. The production process involved progressive dies consisting of nine stations: first pierce, first trim, second trim, idle, flange, idle, second pierce, idle, and parting. However, at the 7th-9th station, the pilot hole in the product deforms into an oval shape, which is undesirable. Gemba-Kaizen methods were used in this study, and primary data were collected by comparing the design and actual progressive dies. The results showed that product defects are primarily caused by an unbalanced BHF and inadequate piercing clearance. A uniform distribution of force during the forming process is obtained by reducing the spring number on the blank holder. This reduces the force generated during the process. Furthermore, the die clearance was increased from 0.01 mm to 0.1 mm, making press and die alignment less critical and requiring less cutting and stripping forces\",\"PeriodicalId\":34350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v4i2.1779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v4i2.1779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了前座外托架压边力控制失效的原因。生产过程涉及由九个工位组成的级进模具:第一次穿孔、第一次修整、第二次修整、空档、法兰、空档、第二次穿孔、空档和分型。但是,在第7 -9站,产品的先导孔变形成椭圆形,这是不希望的。本研究采用了Gemba-Kaizen方法,并通过比较设计级进模与实际级进模来收集原始数据。结果表明,产品缺陷主要是由压边力不平衡和穿孔间隙不足引起的。在成形过程中,通过减少压边上的弹簧数量来获得均匀的力分布。这减少了过程中产生的力。此外,模具间隙从0.01毫米增加到0.1毫米,使压力机和模具对准不那么关键,需要更少的切割和剥离力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Failure Investigation of Blank Holder Force (BHF) Control in The Outside Bracket For Front Seat
This study investigated the failure of the Blank Holder Force (BHF) control in the outside bracket for the front seat. The production process involved progressive dies consisting of nine stations: first pierce, first trim, second trim, idle, flange, idle, second pierce, idle, and parting. However, at the 7th-9th station, the pilot hole in the product deforms into an oval shape, which is undesirable. Gemba-Kaizen methods were used in this study, and primary data were collected by comparing the design and actual progressive dies. The results showed that product defects are primarily caused by an unbalanced BHF and inadequate piercing clearance. A uniform distribution of force during the forming process is obtained by reducing the spring number on the blank holder. This reduces the force generated during the process. Furthermore, the die clearance was increased from 0.01 mm to 0.1 mm, making press and die alignment less critical and requiring less cutting and stripping forces
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信