从不结盟到多结盟：评估印度外交政策的转变

Q3 Social Sciences

Round Table Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00358533.2023.2165367

Rahul Mishra

{"title":"从不结盟到多结盟：评估印度外交政策的转变","authors":"Rahul Mishra","doi":"10.1080/00358533.2023.2165367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Establishing a non-aligned bloc at the height of the power politics-ridden Cold War era was one of the most profound normative contributions India made to the modern international order. This article argues that NAM was a pragmatic yet principled approach to dealing with a world dominated by divisive power politics. For India, non-alignment still lives on to a certain extent in the form of its spirited defence of strategic autonomy and the recent iteration of ‘multi-alignment’ in Indian foreign policy to deal with an uncertain world.","PeriodicalId":35685,"journal":{"name":"Round Table","volume":"112 1","pages":"43 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From non-alignment to multi-alignment: assessing India’s foreign policy shift\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00358533.2023.2165367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Establishing a non-aligned bloc at the height of the power politics-ridden Cold War era was one of the most profound normative contributions India made to the modern international order. This article argues that NAM was a pragmatic yet principled approach to dealing with a world dominated by divisive power politics. For India, non-alignment still lives on to a certain extent in the form of its spirited defence of strategic autonomy and the recent iteration of ‘multi-alignment’ in Indian foreign policy to deal with an uncertain world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Round Table\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Round Table\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2023.2165367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Round Table","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2023.2165367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在强权政治充斥的冷战时期，建立一个不结盟集团是印度对现代国际秩序做出的最深刻的规范贡献之一。本文认为，不结盟运动是一种务实而又有原则的方法，以应对由分裂的大国政治主导的世界。对印度来说，不结盟在一定程度上仍然存在，其形式是积极捍卫战略自治，以及印度外交政策中最近反复出现的“多结盟”，以应对一个不确定的世界。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

From non-alignment to multi-alignment: assessing India’s foreign policy shift

ABSTRACT Establishing a non-aligned bloc at the height of the power politics-ridden Cold War era was one of the most profound normative contributions India made to the modern international order. This article argues that NAM was a pragmatic yet principled approach to dealing with a world dominated by divisive power politics. For India, non-alignment still lives on to a certain extent in the form of its spirited defence of strategic autonomy and the recent iteration of ‘multi-alignment’ in Indian foreign policy to deal with an uncertain world.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Round Table Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded in 1910, The Round Table, Britain"s oldest international affairs journal, provides analysis and commentary on all aspects of international affairs. The journal is the major source for coverage of policy issues concerning the contemporary Commonwealth and its role in international affairs, with occasional articles on themes of historical interest. The Round Table has for many years been a repository of informed scholarship, opinion, and judgement regarding both international relations in general, and the Commonwealth in particular, with authorship and readership drawn from the worlds of government, business, finance and academe.