与同事一起推特:对一个机构标签的研究

Q1 Social Sciences
L. Eutsler, Daniel G. Krutka, Jessica Gallow, Krystle Brom
{"title":"与同事一起推特:对一个机构标签的研究","authors":"L. Eutsler, Daniel G. Krutka, Jessica Gallow, Krystle Brom","doi":"10.1080/21532974.2023.2235018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Higher education work is often conducted in silos without the in-person interactions that characterize other educational settings. This is increasingly evident since the COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant shift in online communication and remote work. Educators might grow from understanding the types and quality of interactions that social media could facilitate. We investigate a dataset of 557 tweets from 51 participants over 2-years of an institutional hashtag in a College of Education. We analyze who tweets, the frequency of interactions, and supportive reasoning from seven participant interviews. Shaped by networked participatory scholarship utilizing a mixed-method research design, we discern tweeting differences based on role and found the most common reason to tweet is for affective reasons. Faculty and the college Twitter account encompass 66% of Tweets, with the least likes from the college, department, and university. Tweets receiving the most likes were generally positive and focused on faculty and student accomplishments. Individual interviews indicate the institutional hashtag led to a sense of connectedness, with regret toward not using the hashtag more frequently. We describe why participants tweeted, and offer benefits, drawbacks, possibilities, and suggestions for the use of an institutional hashtag to connect a networked institutional community.","PeriodicalId":52191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education","volume":"39 1","pages":"182 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tweeting with colleagues: A study of an institutional hashtag\",\"authors\":\"L. Eutsler, Daniel G. Krutka, Jessica Gallow, Krystle Brom\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21532974.2023.2235018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Higher education work is often conducted in silos without the in-person interactions that characterize other educational settings. This is increasingly evident since the COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant shift in online communication and remote work. Educators might grow from understanding the types and quality of interactions that social media could facilitate. We investigate a dataset of 557 tweets from 51 participants over 2-years of an institutional hashtag in a College of Education. We analyze who tweets, the frequency of interactions, and supportive reasoning from seven participant interviews. Shaped by networked participatory scholarship utilizing a mixed-method research design, we discern tweeting differences based on role and found the most common reason to tweet is for affective reasons. Faculty and the college Twitter account encompass 66% of Tweets, with the least likes from the college, department, and university. Tweets receiving the most likes were generally positive and focused on faculty and student accomplishments. Individual interviews indicate the institutional hashtag led to a sense of connectedness, with regret toward not using the hashtag more frequently. We describe why participants tweeted, and offer benefits, drawbacks, possibilities, and suggestions for the use of an institutional hashtag to connect a networked institutional community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"182 - 200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2235018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2235018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高等教育工作通常是在孤岛中进行的,没有其他教育环境特有的面对面的互动。自2019冠状病毒病大流行导致在线通信和远程工作发生重大转变以来,这一点越来越明显。教育工作者可能会从理解社交媒体可以促进的互动的类型和质量中成长。我们调查了来自51名参与者的557条推文的数据集,这些推文在教育学院的一个机构标签中持续了2年。我们分析了谁发了推文,互动的频率,以及来自7位参与者访谈的支持性推理。通过使用混合方法研究设计的网络参与式奖学金,我们根据角色辨别推文差异,并发现推文最常见的原因是出于情感原因。教职员工和学院的推特账户占据了66%的推文,来自学院、系和大学的点赞最少。获得点赞最多的推文通常是积极的,关注的是教师和学生的成就。个别采访表明,机构标签带来了一种联系感,遗憾的是没有更频繁地使用这个标签。我们描述了参与者发推文的原因,并提供了使用机构标签连接网络机构社区的好处、缺点、可能性和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tweeting with colleagues: A study of an institutional hashtag
Abstract Higher education work is often conducted in silos without the in-person interactions that characterize other educational settings. This is increasingly evident since the COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant shift in online communication and remote work. Educators might grow from understanding the types and quality of interactions that social media could facilitate. We investigate a dataset of 557 tweets from 51 participants over 2-years of an institutional hashtag in a College of Education. We analyze who tweets, the frequency of interactions, and supportive reasoning from seven participant interviews. Shaped by networked participatory scholarship utilizing a mixed-method research design, we discern tweeting differences based on role and found the most common reason to tweet is for affective reasons. Faculty and the college Twitter account encompass 66% of Tweets, with the least likes from the college, department, and university. Tweets receiving the most likes were generally positive and focused on faculty and student accomplishments. Individual interviews indicate the institutional hashtag led to a sense of connectedness, with regret toward not using the hashtag more frequently. We describe why participants tweeted, and offer benefits, drawbacks, possibilities, and suggestions for the use of an institutional hashtag to connect a networked institutional community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信