构建工作场所月经卫生管理计划的商业案例:社会成本效益分析

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 WATER RESOURCES
Jacob C. Eaton, Michelle Bronsard, Mark Radin, Christopher Kaunda, M. Avni, Aditi Krishna, Mary Kincaid
{"title":"构建工作场所月经卫生管理计划的商业案例:社会成本效益分析","authors":"Jacob C. Eaton, Michelle Bronsard, Mark Radin, Christopher Kaunda, M. Avni, Aditi Krishna, Mary Kincaid","doi":"10.2166/washdev.2023.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Inadequate menstrual health and hygiene (MHH) pose a great challenge for working women, affecting their productivity, job satisfaction, attendance, and advancement, and also have implications for their employers. Yet there has been little research to quantify the impacts of poor MHH conditions or to consider the value add of workplace MHH programs. As part of USAID's Water Sanitation and Hygiene Partnerships for Learning and Sustainability project, we conducted a social cost–benefit analysis (CBA) of the Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM) in the Workplace Action Research, a 10-month intervention in private sector enterprises in Nepal and Kenya. The intervention aimed to determine if providing adequate MHM in the workplace contributes to women's economic empowerment, including improved business and social outcomes. This CBA of a workplace MHM intervention – the first of its kind – found a positive return for investing in workplace MHM programs. The average benefit–cost ratio in the base-case across factories in a 10-month intervention was 1.4, which increased to 2.3 when projected over 24 months. These early results of a pilot CBA on MHM in the workplace should serve as a call for greater attention by governments and businesses to the needs of menstruating women.","PeriodicalId":48893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building a business case for workplace menstrual hygiene management programs: a social cost–benefit analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jacob C. Eaton, Michelle Bronsard, Mark Radin, Christopher Kaunda, M. Avni, Aditi Krishna, Mary Kincaid\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/washdev.2023.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Inadequate menstrual health and hygiene (MHH) pose a great challenge for working women, affecting their productivity, job satisfaction, attendance, and advancement, and also have implications for their employers. Yet there has been little research to quantify the impacts of poor MHH conditions or to consider the value add of workplace MHH programs. As part of USAID's Water Sanitation and Hygiene Partnerships for Learning and Sustainability project, we conducted a social cost–benefit analysis (CBA) of the Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM) in the Workplace Action Research, a 10-month intervention in private sector enterprises in Nepal and Kenya. The intervention aimed to determine if providing adequate MHM in the workplace contributes to women's economic empowerment, including improved business and social outcomes. This CBA of a workplace MHM intervention – the first of its kind – found a positive return for investing in workplace MHM programs. The average benefit–cost ratio in the base-case across factories in a 10-month intervention was 1.4, which increased to 2.3 when projected over 24 months. These early results of a pilot CBA on MHM in the workplace should serve as a call for greater attention by governments and businesses to the needs of menstruating women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2023.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2023.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

月经健康和卫生不足对职业女性构成了巨大挑战,影响了她们的生产力、工作满意度、出勤率和晋升,也对雇主产生了影响。然而,很少有研究量化恶劣MHH条件的影响,也很少有研究考虑工作场所MHH计划的附加值。作为美国国际开发署学习和可持续发展水环境卫生和卫生伙伴关系项目的一部分,我们在工作场所行动研究中对月经卫生管理(MHM)进行了社会成本效益分析(CBA),这是对尼泊尔和肯尼亚私营部门企业的一项为期10个月的干预。干预措施旨在确定在工作场所提供足够的MHM是否有助于增强妇女的经济权能,包括改善商业和社会成果。这种职场MHM干预的CBA——这是第一次——发现了投资职场MHM项目的积极回报。在10个月的干预中,各工厂在基本情况下的平均效益-成本比为1.4,在24个月内预测时,该比率增至2.3。工作场所MHM CBA试点的这些早期结果应该呼吁政府和企业更加关注月经来潮女性的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building a business case for workplace menstrual hygiene management programs: a social cost–benefit analysis
Inadequate menstrual health and hygiene (MHH) pose a great challenge for working women, affecting their productivity, job satisfaction, attendance, and advancement, and also have implications for their employers. Yet there has been little research to quantify the impacts of poor MHH conditions or to consider the value add of workplace MHH programs. As part of USAID's Water Sanitation and Hygiene Partnerships for Learning and Sustainability project, we conducted a social cost–benefit analysis (CBA) of the Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM) in the Workplace Action Research, a 10-month intervention in private sector enterprises in Nepal and Kenya. The intervention aimed to determine if providing adequate MHM in the workplace contributes to women's economic empowerment, including improved business and social outcomes. This CBA of a workplace MHM intervention – the first of its kind – found a positive return for investing in workplace MHM programs. The average benefit–cost ratio in the base-case across factories in a 10-month intervention was 1.4, which increased to 2.3 when projected over 24 months. These early results of a pilot CBA on MHM in the workplace should serve as a call for greater attention by governments and businesses to the needs of menstruating women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of high-quality information on the science, policy and practice of drinking-water supply, sanitation and hygiene at local, national and international levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信