{"title":"非洲的恢复性追随者:前因、主持人和后果","authors":"B. Zoogah, J. Abugre","doi":"10.1080/23322373.2020.1777818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, we report on three studies that examine one perspective of strategic followership: restorative followership. It centers on the restorative behavior of followers in bad leadership contexts. In Study 1, we leverage insight from restorative behavior theory to examine the question, what are the antecedents of restorative followership? Data from working MBA students (n = 185) in Ghana in 2015 support our expectation that bad leader influence (incompetent communication and lack of participative decision-making) positively relates to restorative behaviors of followers. In Study 2, we examine active engagement as a mechanism by which bad leader behaviors influence restorative behavior of followers, and the extent to which follower-leader value congruence moderates the relationship. Data from executive MBAs (n = 179) in Ghana in 2016 show support for the mediating and moderating effects. In Study 3, we examine one consequence of restorative behavior – restorative value – using relational capital theory and data from 193 workers from a media organization in Ghana in 2017. We find support for restorative value ratings by supervisors as an outcome of restorative behavior. We discuss the overall findings in support of restorative followership. Our use of data from Ghana, an African country, to test the theory, suggests we adopted a context-specific approach in the three studies.","PeriodicalId":37290,"journal":{"name":"Africa Journal of Management","volume":"6 1","pages":"161 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23322373.2020.1777818","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restorative followership in Africa: Antecedents, moderators, and consequences\",\"authors\":\"B. Zoogah, J. Abugre\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23322373.2020.1777818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this paper, we report on three studies that examine one perspective of strategic followership: restorative followership. It centers on the restorative behavior of followers in bad leadership contexts. In Study 1, we leverage insight from restorative behavior theory to examine the question, what are the antecedents of restorative followership? Data from working MBA students (n = 185) in Ghana in 2015 support our expectation that bad leader influence (incompetent communication and lack of participative decision-making) positively relates to restorative behaviors of followers. In Study 2, we examine active engagement as a mechanism by which bad leader behaviors influence restorative behavior of followers, and the extent to which follower-leader value congruence moderates the relationship. Data from executive MBAs (n = 179) in Ghana in 2016 show support for the mediating and moderating effects. In Study 3, we examine one consequence of restorative behavior – restorative value – using relational capital theory and data from 193 workers from a media organization in Ghana in 2017. We find support for restorative value ratings by supervisors as an outcome of restorative behavior. We discuss the overall findings in support of restorative followership. Our use of data from Ghana, an African country, to test the theory, suggests we adopted a context-specific approach in the three studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Africa Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"161 - 193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23322373.2020.1777818\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Africa Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2020.1777818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23322373.2020.1777818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Restorative followership in Africa: Antecedents, moderators, and consequences
ABSTRACT In this paper, we report on three studies that examine one perspective of strategic followership: restorative followership. It centers on the restorative behavior of followers in bad leadership contexts. In Study 1, we leverage insight from restorative behavior theory to examine the question, what are the antecedents of restorative followership? Data from working MBA students (n = 185) in Ghana in 2015 support our expectation that bad leader influence (incompetent communication and lack of participative decision-making) positively relates to restorative behaviors of followers. In Study 2, we examine active engagement as a mechanism by which bad leader behaviors influence restorative behavior of followers, and the extent to which follower-leader value congruence moderates the relationship. Data from executive MBAs (n = 179) in Ghana in 2016 show support for the mediating and moderating effects. In Study 3, we examine one consequence of restorative behavior – restorative value – using relational capital theory and data from 193 workers from a media organization in Ghana in 2017. We find support for restorative value ratings by supervisors as an outcome of restorative behavior. We discuss the overall findings in support of restorative followership. Our use of data from Ghana, an African country, to test the theory, suggests we adopted a context-specific approach in the three studies.
期刊介绍:
The beginning of the Twenty First Century has witnessed Africa’s rise and progress as one of the fastest growing and most promising regions of the world. At the same time, serious challenges remain. To sustain and speed up momentum, avoid reversal, and deal effectively with emerging challenges and opportunities, Africa needs better management scholarship, education and practice. The purpose of the Africa Journal of Management (AJOM) is to advance management theory, research, education, practice and service in Africa by promoting the production and dissemination of high quality and relevant manuscripts. AJOM is committed to publishing original, rigorous, scholarly empirical and theoretical research papers, which demonstrate clear understanding of the management literature and draw on Africa’s local indigenous knowledge, wisdom and current realities. As the first scholarly journal of the Africa Academy of Management (AFAM), AJOM gives voice to all those who are committed to advancing management scholarship, education and practice in or about Africa, for the benefit of all of Africa. AJOM welcomes manuscripts that develop, test, replicate or validate management theories, tools and methods with Africa as the starting point. The journal is open to a wide range of quality, evidence-based methodological approaches and methods that “link” “Western” management theories with Africa’s indigenous knowledge systems, methods and practice. We are particularly interested in manuscripts which address Africa’s most important development needs, challenges and opportunities as well as the big management questions of the day. We are interested in research papers which address issues of ethical conduct in different African settings.