{"title":"宗教社工能否以肯定的态度对待LGBTQ服务对象?监管背景下的探索","authors":"S. Westwood","doi":"10.1080/09649069.2022.2067652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Tensions between religious freedoms and lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ) rights have evolved from debates about sinful deviance to competing equality claims. There is a growing debate, originally in the US, but emerging in the UK, about whether religious social workers, particularly those holding fundamentalist Christian beliefs, can deliver affirmative, anti-oppressive services to LGBTQ people. This is important because over two-fifths of social workers identify as Christian and almost a quarter of UK charities, including those running community and residential care services for older people, are religious organisations. These concerns have been highlighted in a recent judicial review involving a social work student, Felix Ngole, who was expelled by the University of Sheffield for making homophobic comments on his Facebook page. The Court of Appeal ruled the University’s decision was procedurally flawed and had conflated religious prejudice with discrimination. This paper considers 70 online responses to a Community Care article written by Ngole, which highlight divided opinions within the social work profession. It critically interrogates, within regulatory contexts, whether it is possible to be both deeply opposed to LGBTQ people’s lives and yet work affirmatively and anti-oppressively with them. An urgent research agenda is proposed.","PeriodicalId":45633,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW","volume":"44 1","pages":"205 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can religious social workers practice affirmatively with LGBTQ service recipients? An exploration within the regulatory context\",\"authors\":\"S. Westwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09649069.2022.2067652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Tensions between religious freedoms and lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ) rights have evolved from debates about sinful deviance to competing equality claims. There is a growing debate, originally in the US, but emerging in the UK, about whether religious social workers, particularly those holding fundamentalist Christian beliefs, can deliver affirmative, anti-oppressive services to LGBTQ people. This is important because over two-fifths of social workers identify as Christian and almost a quarter of UK charities, including those running community and residential care services for older people, are religious organisations. These concerns have been highlighted in a recent judicial review involving a social work student, Felix Ngole, who was expelled by the University of Sheffield for making homophobic comments on his Facebook page. The Court of Appeal ruled the University’s decision was procedurally flawed and had conflated religious prejudice with discrimination. This paper considers 70 online responses to a Community Care article written by Ngole, which highlight divided opinions within the social work profession. It critically interrogates, within regulatory contexts, whether it is possible to be both deeply opposed to LGBTQ people’s lives and yet work affirmatively and anti-oppressively with them. An urgent research agenda is proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"205 - 225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2022.2067652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2022.2067652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
宗教自由与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿(LGBTQ)权利之间的紧张关系已经从关于罪恶越轨行为的争论演变为相互竞争的平等主张。关于宗教社会工作者,特别是那些持有原教旨主义基督教信仰的人,是否可以为LGBTQ人群提供积极的、反压迫的服务,这一问题的争论越来越多,最初在美国,但在英国也出现了。这一点很重要,因为超过五分之二的社会工作者认为自己是基督徒,几乎四分之一的英国慈善机构,包括那些为老年人提供社区和住宿护理服务的机构,都是宗教组织。这些担忧在最近涉及社会工作专业学生菲利克斯·恩戈莱(Felix Ngole)的司法审查中得到了突出体现,他因在Facebook页面上发表恐同言论而被谢菲尔德大学(University of Sheffield)开除。上诉法院裁定该大学的决定在程序上有缺陷,并将宗教偏见与歧视混为一谈。本文考虑了对Ngole撰写的一篇社区护理文章的70个在线回应,这篇文章突出了社会工作专业内部的分歧意见。它批判性地质疑,在监管背景下,是否有可能既深深反对LGBTQ人群的生活,又与他们一起积极地、反压迫地工作。提出了一项紧急的研究议程。
Can religious social workers practice affirmatively with LGBTQ service recipients? An exploration within the regulatory context
ABSTRACT Tensions between religious freedoms and lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ) rights have evolved from debates about sinful deviance to competing equality claims. There is a growing debate, originally in the US, but emerging in the UK, about whether religious social workers, particularly those holding fundamentalist Christian beliefs, can deliver affirmative, anti-oppressive services to LGBTQ people. This is important because over two-fifths of social workers identify as Christian and almost a quarter of UK charities, including those running community and residential care services for older people, are religious organisations. These concerns have been highlighted in a recent judicial review involving a social work student, Felix Ngole, who was expelled by the University of Sheffield for making homophobic comments on his Facebook page. The Court of Appeal ruled the University’s decision was procedurally flawed and had conflated religious prejudice with discrimination. This paper considers 70 online responses to a Community Care article written by Ngole, which highlight divided opinions within the social work profession. It critically interrogates, within regulatory contexts, whether it is possible to be both deeply opposed to LGBTQ people’s lives and yet work affirmatively and anti-oppressively with them. An urgent research agenda is proposed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law is concerned with social and family law and policy in a UK, European and international context. The policy of the Editors and of the Editorial Board is to provide an interdisciplinary forum to which academics and professionals working in the social welfare and related fields may turn for guidance, comment and informed debate. Features: •Articles •Cases •European Section •Current Development •Ombudsman"s Section •Book Reviews