生态“自我”与生态“他者”:反乌托邦世界的土著纳迦生态乌托邦

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE
N. Chatterjee
{"title":"生态“自我”与生态“他者”:反乌托邦世界的土著纳迦生态乌托邦","authors":"N. Chatterjee","doi":"10.24193/mjcst.2022.14.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critics have used the colonizer/colonized or the Global North/Global South binaries to restore human rights and freedom. But these planetary or ideological binaries –though theoretically convenient – might not be ecologically sufficient to deal with the ongoing sixth mass extinction (Kolbert, The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History). The need of the hour is to critique the existing knowledge systems (science, technology, politics) through the lens of eco-alterity, wherein every agent of environmental disaster is to be identified as the ecological ‘other.’ In this context, the unique indigenous participation of the ecological ‘selves’ is to be deciphered and disseminated: The indigenous ecotopias of the earth might provide insights into ecological sustenance, food sovereignty and coexistence. The present study, therefore, situates the relevance of exploring indigenous ecological knowledge systems by proposing eco-alterity as the tool to liberate victims of ‘slow violence’ (Nixon). In so doing, it seeks to make visible the unique ecotopia of Naga ecological natives – as represented in Kire’s novels – that has survived multiple forms of slow violence.","PeriodicalId":36476,"journal":{"name":"Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological ‘Self’ vs the Ecological ‘Other’: Indigenous Naga Ecotopia for the Dystopic World\",\"authors\":\"N. Chatterjee\",\"doi\":\"10.24193/mjcst.2022.14.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Critics have used the colonizer/colonized or the Global North/Global South binaries to restore human rights and freedom. But these planetary or ideological binaries –though theoretically convenient – might not be ecologically sufficient to deal with the ongoing sixth mass extinction (Kolbert, The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History). The need of the hour is to critique the existing knowledge systems (science, technology, politics) through the lens of eco-alterity, wherein every agent of environmental disaster is to be identified as the ecological ‘other.’ In this context, the unique indigenous participation of the ecological ‘selves’ is to be deciphered and disseminated: The indigenous ecotopias of the earth might provide insights into ecological sustenance, food sovereignty and coexistence. The present study, therefore, situates the relevance of exploring indigenous ecological knowledge systems by proposing eco-alterity as the tool to liberate victims of ‘slow violence’ (Nixon). In so doing, it seeks to make visible the unique ecotopia of Naga ecological natives – as represented in Kire’s novels – that has survived multiple forms of slow violence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24193/mjcst.2022.14.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/mjcst.2022.14.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

批评者用殖民者/被殖民者或全球北方/全球南方的二元对立来恢复人权和自由。但这些行星或意识形态的二元——尽管理论上很方便——在生态上可能不足以应对正在进行的第六次大灭绝(科尔伯特,《第六次大灭绝:非自然历史》)。当前的需要是通过生态替代性的视角来批判现有的知识体系(科学、技术、政治),在生态替代性中,每一个造成环境灾难的因素都被认定为生态的“他者”。在这种背景下,生态“自我”的独特的土著参与将被破译和传播:地球的土著生态乌托邦可能提供对生态维持、粮食主权和共存的见解。因此,本研究通过提出生态替代性作为解放“缓慢暴力”受害者的工具,定位了探索土著生态知识系统的相关性(Nixon)。在这样做的过程中,它试图让人们看到纳迦生态原住民的独特生态乌托邦——就像基尔的小说中所表现的那样——在多种形式的缓慢暴力中幸存下来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecological ‘Self’ vs the Ecological ‘Other’: Indigenous Naga Ecotopia for the Dystopic World
Critics have used the colonizer/colonized or the Global North/Global South binaries to restore human rights and freedom. But these planetary or ideological binaries –though theoretically convenient – might not be ecologically sufficient to deal with the ongoing sixth mass extinction (Kolbert, The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History). The need of the hour is to critique the existing knowledge systems (science, technology, politics) through the lens of eco-alterity, wherein every agent of environmental disaster is to be identified as the ecological ‘other.’ In this context, the unique indigenous participation of the ecological ‘selves’ is to be deciphered and disseminated: The indigenous ecotopias of the earth might provide insights into ecological sustenance, food sovereignty and coexistence. The present study, therefore, situates the relevance of exploring indigenous ecological knowledge systems by proposing eco-alterity as the tool to liberate victims of ‘slow violence’ (Nixon). In so doing, it seeks to make visible the unique ecotopia of Naga ecological natives – as represented in Kire’s novels – that has survived multiple forms of slow violence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory
Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信