口腔微生物和入口门引起的感染性心内膜炎与以前的牙科手术:是否存在关系?

J. Castillo, M. Sánchez, M. Herrera, M. Ruiz, P. Anguita, V. Bonilla
{"title":"口腔微生物和入口门引起的感染性心内膜炎与以前的牙科手术:是否存在关系?","authors":"J. Castillo, M. Sánchez, M. Herrera, M. Ruiz, P. Anguita, V. Bonilla","doi":"10.31487/j.dobcr.2020.02.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are no recent studies that have evaluated the epidemiological relationship between dental manipulations the etiology of IE by these microorganisms, basically Streptococcus viridans. Our objective is to analyse the relationship between these variables and the possible therapeutic implications. For this, we have analysed a prospective single-center series of IE in patients not addicted to parenteral drugs collected and followed between 1987 and 2018. 403 cases of native and late prosthetic IE were diagnosed and followed up in our center. Of them, 91 were produced by oral streptococci (22.6%). The percentage of this microorganism has remained constant throughout the 30 years (24.8% of the cases from 1987-1997, 25% of those from 1998-2007 and 19.1% from 2008-2018. Although there was a history of dental manipulation in a greater proportion in cases of IE due to Streptococcus viridans (24% vs. 6.5%, p <0.001), in most cases due to Streptococcus viridans (76% of them) there was no previous dental manipulation. In these cases, the infection may be due to the usual daily manipulations of the mouth (brushing, dental floss) or periodontal disease. Given this low sensitivity, it cannot be ruled out that IE is caused by this microorganism in the absence of a history of visiting the dentist, with the implications for empirical antibiotic treatment that this entails","PeriodicalId":72781,"journal":{"name":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infective Endocarditis Caused by Oral Microorganisms and Entrance Door and Previous Dental Procedures: Does a Relationship Exists?\",\"authors\":\"J. Castillo, M. Sánchez, M. Herrera, M. Ruiz, P. Anguita, V. Bonilla\",\"doi\":\"10.31487/j.dobcr.2020.02.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are no recent studies that have evaluated the epidemiological relationship between dental manipulations the etiology of IE by these microorganisms, basically Streptococcus viridans. Our objective is to analyse the relationship between these variables and the possible therapeutic implications. For this, we have analysed a prospective single-center series of IE in patients not addicted to parenteral drugs collected and followed between 1987 and 2018. 403 cases of native and late prosthetic IE were diagnosed and followed up in our center. Of them, 91 were produced by oral streptococci (22.6%). The percentage of this microorganism has remained constant throughout the 30 years (24.8% of the cases from 1987-1997, 25% of those from 1998-2007 and 19.1% from 2008-2018. Although there was a history of dental manipulation in a greater proportion in cases of IE due to Streptococcus viridans (24% vs. 6.5%, p <0.001), in most cases due to Streptococcus viridans (76% of them) there was no previous dental manipulation. In these cases, the infection may be due to the usual daily manipulations of the mouth (brushing, dental floss) or periodontal disease. Given this low sensitivity, it cannot be ruled out that IE is caused by this microorganism in the absence of a history of visiting the dentist, with the implications for empirical antibiotic treatment that this entails\",\"PeriodicalId\":72781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.dobcr.2020.02.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.dobcr.2020.02.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近没有研究评估牙科操作与这些微生物(主要是翠绿链球菌)引起的IE病因之间的流行病学关系。我们的目的是分析这些变量之间的关系和可能的治疗意义。为此,我们分析了1987年至2018年间收集和随访的非肠外药物成瘾患者的前瞻性单中心IE系列。本中心对403例原发性和晚期假体IE进行了诊断和随访。其中91例由口腔链球菌产生,占22.6%。该微生物的百分比在30年中保持不变(1987-1997年占24.8%,1998-2007年占25%,2008-2018年占19.1%)。尽管翠绿链球菌引起的IE病例中有较大比例的患者有牙齿操作史(24%对6.5%,p <0.001),但大多数翠绿链球菌引起的病例(76%)没有牙齿操作史。在这些情况下,感染可能是由于日常的口腔操作(刷牙,牙线)或牙周病。鉴于这种低敏感性,不能排除IE是在没有看过牙医的情况下由这种微生物引起的,这意味着需要经验性抗生素治疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Infective Endocarditis Caused by Oral Microorganisms and Entrance Door and Previous Dental Procedures: Does a Relationship Exists?
There are no recent studies that have evaluated the epidemiological relationship between dental manipulations the etiology of IE by these microorganisms, basically Streptococcus viridans. Our objective is to analyse the relationship between these variables and the possible therapeutic implications. For this, we have analysed a prospective single-center series of IE in patients not addicted to parenteral drugs collected and followed between 1987 and 2018. 403 cases of native and late prosthetic IE were diagnosed and followed up in our center. Of them, 91 were produced by oral streptococci (22.6%). The percentage of this microorganism has remained constant throughout the 30 years (24.8% of the cases from 1987-1997, 25% of those from 1998-2007 and 19.1% from 2008-2018. Although there was a history of dental manipulation in a greater proportion in cases of IE due to Streptococcus viridans (24% vs. 6.5%, p <0.001), in most cases due to Streptococcus viridans (76% of them) there was no previous dental manipulation. In these cases, the infection may be due to the usual daily manipulations of the mouth (brushing, dental floss) or periodontal disease. Given this low sensitivity, it cannot be ruled out that IE is caused by this microorganism in the absence of a history of visiting the dentist, with the implications for empirical antibiotic treatment that this entails
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信