非洲高等教育机构研究生产力相关因素:系统评价。

Q2 Multidisciplinary
Dieudonne Uwizeye, Florah Karimi, C. Thiong'o, Jackline Syonguvi, V. Ochieng, Francis Kiroro, Alex Gateri, Anne M. Khisa, Hesborn Wao
{"title":"非洲高等教育机构研究生产力相关因素:系统评价。","authors":"Dieudonne Uwizeye, Florah Karimi, C. Thiong'o, Jackline Syonguvi, V. Ochieng, Francis Kiroro, Alex Gateri, Anne M. Khisa, Hesborn Wao","doi":"10.12688/AASOPENRES.13211.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are low levels of research productivity among Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Africa, a situation that is likely to compromise the development agenda of the continent if not addressed. We conducted a systematic literature review to determine the factors associated with research productivity in HEIs in Africa and the researchers' motives for research. Methods: We identified 838 papers related to research productivity in HEIs in Africa from various databases, from which we included 28 publications for review. The inclusion criteria were that (i) the paper's primary focus was on factors associated with research productivity; (ii) the setting was on the higher education institutions in Africa; (iii) the type of publication was peer-reviewed papers and book chapters based on primary or secondary data analysis; and (iv) the language was English or French. Essays, opinions, blogs, editorials, reviews, and commentaries were excluded. Results: Most of the studies operationalized research productivity as either journal publications or conference proceedings. Both institutional and individual factors are associated with the level of research productivity in HEIs in Africa. Institutional factors include the availability of research funding, level of institutional networking, and the degree of research collaborations, while individual factors include personal motivation, academic qualifications, and research self-efficacy. Conclusions: Deliberate efforts in HEIs in Africa that addressed both individual and institutional barriers to research productivity are promising. This study recommends that the leadership of HEIs in Africa prioritizes the funding of research to enable researchers to contribute to the development agenda of the continent. Moreover, HEIs should build institutional support to research through the provision of research enabling environments, policies and incentives; strengthening of researchers' capabilities through relevant training courses, mentorship and coaching; and embracing networking and collaboration opportunities.","PeriodicalId":34179,"journal":{"name":"AAS Open Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with research productivity in higher education institutions in Africa: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Dieudonne Uwizeye, Florah Karimi, C. Thiong'o, Jackline Syonguvi, V. Ochieng, Francis Kiroro, Alex Gateri, Anne M. Khisa, Hesborn Wao\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/AASOPENRES.13211.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There are low levels of research productivity among Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Africa, a situation that is likely to compromise the development agenda of the continent if not addressed. We conducted a systematic literature review to determine the factors associated with research productivity in HEIs in Africa and the researchers' motives for research. Methods: We identified 838 papers related to research productivity in HEIs in Africa from various databases, from which we included 28 publications for review. The inclusion criteria were that (i) the paper's primary focus was on factors associated with research productivity; (ii) the setting was on the higher education institutions in Africa; (iii) the type of publication was peer-reviewed papers and book chapters based on primary or secondary data analysis; and (iv) the language was English or French. Essays, opinions, blogs, editorials, reviews, and commentaries were excluded. Results: Most of the studies operationalized research productivity as either journal publications or conference proceedings. Both institutional and individual factors are associated with the level of research productivity in HEIs in Africa. Institutional factors include the availability of research funding, level of institutional networking, and the degree of research collaborations, while individual factors include personal motivation, academic qualifications, and research self-efficacy. Conclusions: Deliberate efforts in HEIs in Africa that addressed both individual and institutional barriers to research productivity are promising. This study recommends that the leadership of HEIs in Africa prioritizes the funding of research to enable researchers to contribute to the development agenda of the continent. Moreover, HEIs should build institutional support to research through the provision of research enabling environments, policies and incentives; strengthening of researchers' capabilities through relevant training courses, mentorship and coaching; and embracing networking and collaboration opportunities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAS Open Research\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAS Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/AASOPENRES.13211.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAS Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/AASOPENRES.13211.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:非洲高等教育机构(HEIs)的研究生产力水平较低,如果不加以解决,这种情况可能会损害非洲大陆的发展议程。我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,以确定与非洲高等学校研究生产力相关的因素和研究人员的研究动机。方法:我们从不同的数据库中确定了838篇与非洲高等学校研究生产力相关的论文,从中我们纳入了28篇论文进行综述。纳入标准为:(i)论文主要关注与研究生产力相关的因素;以非洲的高等教育机构为背景;(iii)出版物类型是基于第一手或第二手数据分析的同行评议的论文和书籍章节;(iv)语言为英语或法语。论文、观点、博客、社论、评论和评论被排除在外。结果:大多数研究以期刊出版物或会议论文集的形式实现了研究生产力。体制和个人因素都与非洲高等教育机构的研究生产力水平有关。制度因素包括研究经费的可获得性、机构网络的水平和研究合作的程度,而个人因素包括个人动机、学术资格和研究自我效能。结论:在非洲的高等教育机构中,解决个人和机构阻碍研究生产力的障碍的深思熟虑的努力是有希望的。这项研究建议,非洲高等教育机构的领导应该优先考虑资助研究,使研究人员能够为非洲大陆的发展议程做出贡献。此外,高等教育院校应通过提供有利研究的环境、政策和奖励措施,建立对研究的体制支持;通过相关的培训课程、指导和辅导,加强研究人员的能力;拥抱网络和合作的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with research productivity in higher education institutions in Africa: a systematic review.
Background: There are low levels of research productivity among Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Africa, a situation that is likely to compromise the development agenda of the continent if not addressed. We conducted a systematic literature review to determine the factors associated with research productivity in HEIs in Africa and the researchers' motives for research. Methods: We identified 838 papers related to research productivity in HEIs in Africa from various databases, from which we included 28 publications for review. The inclusion criteria were that (i) the paper's primary focus was on factors associated with research productivity; (ii) the setting was on the higher education institutions in Africa; (iii) the type of publication was peer-reviewed papers and book chapters based on primary or secondary data analysis; and (iv) the language was English or French. Essays, opinions, blogs, editorials, reviews, and commentaries were excluded. Results: Most of the studies operationalized research productivity as either journal publications or conference proceedings. Both institutional and individual factors are associated with the level of research productivity in HEIs in Africa. Institutional factors include the availability of research funding, level of institutional networking, and the degree of research collaborations, while individual factors include personal motivation, academic qualifications, and research self-efficacy. Conclusions: Deliberate efforts in HEIs in Africa that addressed both individual and institutional barriers to research productivity are promising. This study recommends that the leadership of HEIs in Africa prioritizes the funding of research to enable researchers to contribute to the development agenda of the continent. Moreover, HEIs should build institutional support to research through the provision of research enabling environments, policies and incentives; strengthening of researchers' capabilities through relevant training courses, mentorship and coaching; and embracing networking and collaboration opportunities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AAS Open Research
AAS Open Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信