TNHE和EMI的E

IF 0.9 Q2 LINGUISTICS

Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2021-07-07 DOI:10.1075/ARAL.20111.REY

Dudley Reynolds

{"title":"TNHE和EMI的E","authors":"Dudley Reynolds","doi":"10.1075/ARAL.20111.REY","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Questions asked as part of phenomenographic research are used to critically synthesize findings from the case\n studies in this issue of English-medium instruction (EMI) in transnational higher education (TNHE). With respect to whether EMI in\n TNHE can be considered a phenomenon, it is suggested that the phenomenon is more discursive than empirical. Student and instructor\n perceptions of the phenomenon reveal a critical awareness of the policies that structure the learning environment and agency that\n takes advantage of the policies’ discursive nature to create alternative, multilingual language practices and improve learning. A\n gap between policy and practice that allows for negotiation of the E’s in EMI and TNHE, English and education, is hence called\n for.","PeriodicalId":43911,"journal":{"name":"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The E’s of TNHE and EMI\",\"authors\":\"Dudley Reynolds\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ARAL.20111.REY\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Questions asked as part of phenomenographic research are used to critically synthesize findings from the case\\n studies in this issue of English-medium instruction (EMI) in transnational higher education (TNHE). With respect to whether EMI in\\n TNHE can be considered a phenomenon, it is suggested that the phenomenon is more discursive than empirical. Student and instructor\\n perceptions of the phenomenon reveal a critical awareness of the policies that structure the learning environment and agency that\\n takes advantage of the policies’ discursive nature to create alternative, multilingual language practices and improve learning. A\\n gap between policy and practice that allows for negotiation of the E’s in EMI and TNHE, English and education, is hence called\\n for.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ARAL.20111.REY\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Review of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ARAL.20111.REY","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

作为现象学研究的一部分，提出的问题被用来批判性地综合跨国高等教育（TNHE）中英语教学（EMI）问题的案例研究结果。关于TNHE中的EMI是否可以被视为一种现象，有人认为这种现象更多的是话语性的，而不是实证性的。学生和教师对这一现象的看法表明，他们对构建学习环境的政策和机构有着批判性的认识，这些政策和机构利用政策的话语性质来创造替代的多语言语言实践并改善学习。因此，在政策和实践之间存在差距，允许在EMI和TNHE、英语和教育中进行E的谈判。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The E’s of TNHE and EMI

Questions asked as part of phenomenographic research are used to critically synthesize findings from the case studies in this issue of English-medium instruction (EMI) in transnational higher education (TNHE). With respect to whether EMI in TNHE can be considered a phenomenon, it is suggested that the phenomenon is more discursive than empirical. Student and instructor perceptions of the phenomenon reveal a critical awareness of the policies that structure the learning environment and agency that takes advantage of the policies’ discursive nature to create alternative, multilingual language practices and improve learning. A gap between policy and practice that allows for negotiation of the E’s in EMI and TNHE, English and education, is hence called for.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Australian Review of Applied Linguistics LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Australian Review of Applied Linguistics (ARAL) is the preeminent journal of the Applied Linguistics Association of Australia (ALAA). ARAL is a peer reviewed journal that promotes scholarly discussion and contemporary understandings of language-related matters with a view to impacting on real-world problems and debates. The journal publishes empirical and theoretical research on language/s in educational, professional, institutional and community settings. ARAL welcomes national and international submissions presenting research related to any of the major sub-disciplines of Applied Linguistics as well as transdisciplinary studies. Areas of particular interest include but are not limited to: · Analysis of discourse and interaction · Assessment and evaluation · Bi/multilingualism and bi/multilingual education · Corpus linguistics · Cognitive linguistics · Language, culture and identity · Language maintenance and revitalization · Language planning and policy · Language teaching and learning, including specific languages and TESOL · Pragmatics · Research design and methodology · Second language acquisition · Sociolinguistics · Language and technology · Translating and interpreting.