关闭商学院：管理教育出了什么问题

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Action Learning Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1080/14767333.2023.2218133

Chris Blantern

{"title":"关闭商学院：管理教育出了什么问题","authors":"Chris Blantern","doi":"10.1080/14767333.2023.2218133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this book, Martin Parker inquires into the established discourses of organising and managing, and the way they are propagated, and finds them wanting. His basic thesis is that what business schools teach, and what they stand for, are very narrow, politically selective and presented as a form of naturalised truth (Jenkins 2007, 104) – rendering them unaccountable when it comes to their influence on society at large.","PeriodicalId":44898,"journal":{"name":"Action Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shut down the Business School: What’s Wrong with Management Education\",\"authors\":\"Chris Blantern\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767333.2023.2218133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this book, Martin Parker inquires into the established discourses of organising and managing, and the way they are propagated, and finds them wanting. His basic thesis is that what business schools teach, and what they stand for, are very narrow, politically selective and presented as a form of naturalised truth (Jenkins 2007, 104) – rendering them unaccountable when it comes to their influence on society at large.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2023.2218133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2023.2218133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

在这本书中，马丁·帕克探讨了组织和管理的既定话语，以及它们的传播方式，并发现它们缺乏。他的基本论点是，商学院所教授的内容及其所代表的内容非常狭隘，具有政治选择性，并以一种自然主义真理的形式呈现（Jenkins 2007104）——当涉及到它们对整个社会的影响时，它们不负责任。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Shut down the Business School: What’s Wrong with Management Education

In this book, Martin Parker inquires into the established discourses of organising and managing, and the way they are propagated, and finds them wanting. His basic thesis is that what business schools teach, and what they stand for, are very narrow, politically selective and presented as a form of naturalised truth (Jenkins 2007, 104) – rendering them unaccountable when it comes to their influence on society at large.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Action Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

40.00%

发文量