城市正义:西方社会正义研究的思想渊源

Kai Zhou, Danli Dong, Lanying Pan
{"title":"城市正义:西方社会正义研究的思想渊源","authors":"Kai Zhou, Danli Dong, Lanying Pan","doi":"10.22217/UPI.2018.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The concept of “social justice” has entered the horizon of Chinese planning academics, and became a hotspot in the discussion of urban affairs, while constantly stimulated by the emerging social conflicts. In fact, the philosophical speculations of “justice” and “equity” were nurtured in the whole course of socio-economic and political theory in Eastern and Western Worlds, leaving rich ideological legacies. Therefore, this paper traces the roots of the social justice discourse back to three major ideological sources: (neo)Liberalism, Communitarianism and (neo)Marxism. It summarizes major social justice ideas in the Western World since the Enlightenment, hence to contextualize thoughts, to distinguish viewpoints","PeriodicalId":67440,"journal":{"name":"国际城市规划","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Justice in City: Ideological Sources of the Western Social Justice Research\",\"authors\":\"Kai Zhou, Danli Dong, Lanying Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.22217/UPI.2018.166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The concept of “social justice” has entered the horizon of Chinese planning academics, and became a hotspot in the discussion of urban affairs, while constantly stimulated by the emerging social conflicts. In fact, the philosophical speculations of “justice” and “equity” were nurtured in the whole course of socio-economic and political theory in Eastern and Western Worlds, leaving rich ideological legacies. Therefore, this paper traces the roots of the social justice discourse back to three major ideological sources: (neo)Liberalism, Communitarianism and (neo)Marxism. It summarizes major social justice ideas in the Western World since the Enlightenment, hence to contextualize thoughts, to distinguish viewpoints\",\"PeriodicalId\":67440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"国际城市规划\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"国际城市规划\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22217/UPI.2018.166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"国际城市规划","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22217/UPI.2018.166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

:“社会正义”的概念进入了中国规划学界的视野,成为城市事务讨论的热点,同时不断受到新兴社会矛盾的刺激。事实上,关于“正义”与“公平”的哲学思辨,在东西方社会经济和政治理论的整个发展过程中得到了孕育,留下了丰富的思想遗产。因此,本文将社会正义话语的根源追溯至三大意识形态来源:(新)自由主义、社群主义和(新)马克思主义。它总结了启蒙运动以来西方世界主要的社会正义思想,从而将思想语境化,区分观点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Justice in City: Ideological Sources of the Western Social Justice Research
: The concept of “social justice” has entered the horizon of Chinese planning academics, and became a hotspot in the discussion of urban affairs, while constantly stimulated by the emerging social conflicts. In fact, the philosophical speculations of “justice” and “equity” were nurtured in the whole course of socio-economic and political theory in Eastern and Western Worlds, leaving rich ideological legacies. Therefore, this paper traces the roots of the social justice discourse back to three major ideological sources: (neo)Liberalism, Communitarianism and (neo)Marxism. It summarizes major social justice ideas in the Western World since the Enlightenment, hence to contextualize thoughts, to distinguish viewpoints
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3659
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信