Ghada El.Abedin Rajab, M. Elaziz, S. Soliman, A. Basiony
{"title":"新型屈光参差试验测定眼轴性屈光参差引起的屈光参差","authors":"Ghada El.Abedin Rajab, M. Elaziz, S. Soliman, A. Basiony","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_56_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To determine whether spectacle correction in axial anisometropes can cause significant aniseikonia. Patients and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on eight patients who had axial anisometropia with a spherical equivalent difference between both eyes equal or more than 4 D. Aniseikonia was measured using the New Aniseikonia Test ‘Awaya.’ Aniseikonia of 3% or more was considered clinically significant. Spearman correlation between the amount of aniseikonia and anisometropia was calculated. Results The mean±SD age of the patients was 13±4.64 years (range, 7–24 years). Anisometropia ranging from −14.5 to +5.25 DS with a mean±SD of −6.70±5.18. The overall mean±SD of aniseikonia was −1.45±0.52. Five patients had no aniseikonia, three patients had −1% aniseikonia, and three patients had −2% aniseikonia. Spearman correlation showed an insignificant positive correlation between the amount of anisometropia and aniseikonia (r=0.05, P=0.86). Conclusion Among our cases, spectacle correction in axial anisometropia did not lead to significant aniseikonia using the New Aniseikonia Test. Aniseikonia should be assessed in patients with anisometropia as 1% of aniseikonia per diopter of anisometropia does not apply in every case.","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of spectacle-induced aniseikonia in axial anisometropia using the New Aniseikonia Test\",\"authors\":\"Ghada El.Abedin Rajab, M. Elaziz, S. Soliman, A. Basiony\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ejos.ejos_56_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim To determine whether spectacle correction in axial anisometropes can cause significant aniseikonia. Patients and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on eight patients who had axial anisometropia with a spherical equivalent difference between both eyes equal or more than 4 D. Aniseikonia was measured using the New Aniseikonia Test ‘Awaya.’ Aniseikonia of 3% or more was considered clinically significant. Spearman correlation between the amount of aniseikonia and anisometropia was calculated. Results The mean±SD age of the patients was 13±4.64 years (range, 7–24 years). Anisometropia ranging from −14.5 to +5.25 DS with a mean±SD of −6.70±5.18. The overall mean±SD of aniseikonia was −1.45±0.52. Five patients had no aniseikonia, three patients had −1% aniseikonia, and three patients had −2% aniseikonia. Spearman correlation showed an insignificant positive correlation between the amount of anisometropia and aniseikonia (r=0.05, P=0.86). Conclusion Among our cases, spectacle correction in axial anisometropia did not lead to significant aniseikonia using the New Aniseikonia Test. Aniseikonia should be assessed in patients with anisometropia as 1% of aniseikonia per diopter of anisometropia does not apply in every case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_56_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_56_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measurement of spectacle-induced aniseikonia in axial anisometropia using the New Aniseikonia Test
Aim To determine whether spectacle correction in axial anisometropes can cause significant aniseikonia. Patients and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on eight patients who had axial anisometropia with a spherical equivalent difference between both eyes equal or more than 4 D. Aniseikonia was measured using the New Aniseikonia Test ‘Awaya.’ Aniseikonia of 3% or more was considered clinically significant. Spearman correlation between the amount of aniseikonia and anisometropia was calculated. Results The mean±SD age of the patients was 13±4.64 years (range, 7–24 years). Anisometropia ranging from −14.5 to +5.25 DS with a mean±SD of −6.70±5.18. The overall mean±SD of aniseikonia was −1.45±0.52. Five patients had no aniseikonia, three patients had −1% aniseikonia, and three patients had −2% aniseikonia. Spearman correlation showed an insignificant positive correlation between the amount of anisometropia and aniseikonia (r=0.05, P=0.86). Conclusion Among our cases, spectacle correction in axial anisometropia did not lead to significant aniseikonia using the New Aniseikonia Test. Aniseikonia should be assessed in patients with anisometropia as 1% of aniseikonia per diopter of anisometropia does not apply in every case.