书评:史密斯,S. R.(主编)。(2021)。《亚太地区天赋与人才发展手册》。施普林格新加坡

Q2 Social Sciences
Kate Lafferty
{"title":"书评:史密斯,S. R.(主编)。(2021)。《亚太地区天赋与人才发展手册》。施普林格新加坡","authors":"Kate Lafferty","doi":"10.21505/ajge.2022.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an Australian educator and a researcher in the field of Gifted Education, it is somewhat frustrating at times that the majority of research we turn to is American-centric. Borland, in the foreward of this important handbook, reminds the reader that the conceptions with which we work each day and turn to for guidance, are very much American conceptions of gifted education, so much so that the field itself could be considered an American export. However, as Borland also points out, we cannot ignore the sociocultural contexts when thinking about gifted education. Models such as Gagné’s Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent (DMGT) and the Actiotope Model of Giftedness highlight the need to consider all aspects of the environment and yet perhaps when looking to be informed by research to shape our practice, we forget the larger sociocultural context and ‘make do’ with American research. What is immediately striking about this handbook is the geographical scope and representation of 18 nations from East Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, Oceania and the Americas. With such diverse sociocultural input, the perceptions and conceptions of giftedness and gifted education are bound to provide the reader with a greater understanding of a variety of ways of working with gifted children and adults. This is particularly relevant for Australian practitioners and academics given our multicultural settings.","PeriodicalId":38285,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Gifted Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Smith, S. R. (Ed.). (2021). Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific. Springer Singapore\",\"authors\":\"Kate Lafferty\",\"doi\":\"10.21505/ajge.2022.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As an Australian educator and a researcher in the field of Gifted Education, it is somewhat frustrating at times that the majority of research we turn to is American-centric. Borland, in the foreward of this important handbook, reminds the reader that the conceptions with which we work each day and turn to for guidance, are very much American conceptions of gifted education, so much so that the field itself could be considered an American export. However, as Borland also points out, we cannot ignore the sociocultural contexts when thinking about gifted education. Models such as Gagné’s Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent (DMGT) and the Actiotope Model of Giftedness highlight the need to consider all aspects of the environment and yet perhaps when looking to be informed by research to shape our practice, we forget the larger sociocultural context and ‘make do’ with American research. What is immediately striking about this handbook is the geographical scope and representation of 18 nations from East Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, Oceania and the Americas. With such diverse sociocultural input, the perceptions and conceptions of giftedness and gifted education are bound to provide the reader with a greater understanding of a variety of ways of working with gifted children and adults. This is particularly relevant for Australian practitioners and academics given our multicultural settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Gifted Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Gifted Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21505/ajge.2022.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Gifted Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21505/ajge.2022.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一名澳大利亚教育家和天才教育领域的研究人员,我们转向的大多数研究都是以美国为中心的,这有时有些令人沮丧。Borland在这本重要手册的前言中提醒读者,我们每天工作和寻求指导的概念在很大程度上是美国的天才教育概念,以至于这个领域本身可以被视为美国的出口。然而,正如Borland也指出的那样,在思考天才教育时,我们不能忽视社会文化背景。Gagné的天才与天赋差异模型(DMGT)和天才行为表模型等模型强调了考虑环境各个方面的必要性,然而,也许当我们希望通过研究来塑造我们的实践时,我们忘记了更大的社会文化背景,而“将就”美国的研究。这本手册立即引人注目的是来自东亚、南亚、东南亚、大洋洲和美洲的18个国家的地理范围和代表性。有了如此多样的社会文化输入,对天赋和天赋教育的认知和概念必然会让读者更好地理解与天赋儿童和成人合作的各种方式。鉴于我们的多元文化环境,这对澳大利亚从业者和学者来说尤其重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Smith, S. R. (Ed.). (2021). Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific. Springer Singapore
As an Australian educator and a researcher in the field of Gifted Education, it is somewhat frustrating at times that the majority of research we turn to is American-centric. Borland, in the foreward of this important handbook, reminds the reader that the conceptions with which we work each day and turn to for guidance, are very much American conceptions of gifted education, so much so that the field itself could be considered an American export. However, as Borland also points out, we cannot ignore the sociocultural contexts when thinking about gifted education. Models such as Gagné’s Differentiated Model of Giftedness and Talent (DMGT) and the Actiotope Model of Giftedness highlight the need to consider all aspects of the environment and yet perhaps when looking to be informed by research to shape our practice, we forget the larger sociocultural context and ‘make do’ with American research. What is immediately striking about this handbook is the geographical scope and representation of 18 nations from East Asia, South Asia, Southeast Asia, Oceania and the Americas. With such diverse sociocultural input, the perceptions and conceptions of giftedness and gifted education are bound to provide the reader with a greater understanding of a variety of ways of working with gifted children and adults. This is particularly relevant for Australian practitioners and academics given our multicultural settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Gifted Education
Australasian Journal of Gifted Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信