教育学还是“创伤色情”?种族素养是在澳大利亚社会工作背景下教授种族尊严内容的先决条件

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kathomi Gatwiri, Virginia Mapedzahama
{"title":"教育学还是“创伤色情”?种族素养是在澳大利亚社会工作背景下教授种族尊严内容的先决条件","authors":"Kathomi Gatwiri, Virginia Mapedzahama","doi":"10.1108/jme-11-2021-0205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nOn June 21, 2021, a motion was introduced to the Australian Senate calling on the federal government to reject critical race theory (CRT) from the national curriculum, claiming that CRT is divisive and racist. This was allegedly sparked by revisions to the national school curriculum, which included a more accurate reflection of the historical record of First Nations peoples’ experiences of colonisation and the framing of British arrival onto the continent as an invasion. This paper aims to overview the omnipresence of Western thought systems in the academy and critiques how knowledge production as a disciplinary practice positions race as a “marginalised knowledge”.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper is conceptual and it theorises the morphology and functions of racism within the Australian education system specifically, and across the board. This theorisation offers an invaluable starting point in rethinking how we advocate for and preserve Blac/k scholarship in academia. It examines how the political economy of racism in education offers a transformative position from which scholars can contribute to potential systemic change that promotes racial literacy and racial dignity, and the conditions necessary to foster these changes.\n\n\nFindings\nThe paper confirms what studies by Blac/k scholars already highlight: that racialised knowledges are marked – as an aesthetic addition or as disruptive – or unnecessary – and how these patterns of colonial desires are manifested in the classroom or in race discourse.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nSpecifically, the arguments made in this paper examine two undertheorised concepts, namely, “racial dignity” and “trauma porn” to foreground the reimagination of practices that inform racial literacy in education. This offers a helpful starting place to consider how this form of education facilitates ongoing settler colonialism in Australia. The authors then propose an anti-racist pedagogical practice in social work education entailing three core crucial and transformative elements: self- reflexivity, storytelling and collaboration with Blac/k people.\n","PeriodicalId":43323,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Multicultural Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pedagogy or “trauma porn”? Racial literacy as a prerequisite for teaching racially dignifying content in the Australian social work context\",\"authors\":\"Kathomi Gatwiri, Virginia Mapedzahama\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jme-11-2021-0205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nOn June 21, 2021, a motion was introduced to the Australian Senate calling on the federal government to reject critical race theory (CRT) from the national curriculum, claiming that CRT is divisive and racist. This was allegedly sparked by revisions to the national school curriculum, which included a more accurate reflection of the historical record of First Nations peoples’ experiences of colonisation and the framing of British arrival onto the continent as an invasion. This paper aims to overview the omnipresence of Western thought systems in the academy and critiques how knowledge production as a disciplinary practice positions race as a “marginalised knowledge”.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper is conceptual and it theorises the morphology and functions of racism within the Australian education system specifically, and across the board. This theorisation offers an invaluable starting point in rethinking how we advocate for and preserve Blac/k scholarship in academia. It examines how the political economy of racism in education offers a transformative position from which scholars can contribute to potential systemic change that promotes racial literacy and racial dignity, and the conditions necessary to foster these changes.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe paper confirms what studies by Blac/k scholars already highlight: that racialised knowledges are marked – as an aesthetic addition or as disruptive – or unnecessary – and how these patterns of colonial desires are manifested in the classroom or in race discourse.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nSpecifically, the arguments made in this paper examine two undertheorised concepts, namely, “racial dignity” and “trauma porn” to foreground the reimagination of practices that inform racial literacy in education. This offers a helpful starting place to consider how this form of education facilitates ongoing settler colonialism in Australia. The authors then propose an anti-racist pedagogical practice in social work education entailing three core crucial and transformative elements: self- reflexivity, storytelling and collaboration with Blac/k people.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Multicultural Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Multicultural Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-11-2021-0205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Multicultural Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-11-2021-0205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的2021年6月21日,澳大利亚参议院提出了一项动议,呼吁联邦政府拒绝将批判性种族理论(CRT)纳入国家课程,声称CRT具有分裂性和种族主义色彩。据称,这是由国家学校课程的修订引发的,其中包括更准确地反映第一民族殖民经历的历史记录,以及将英国人抵达欧洲大陆视为入侵。本文旨在概述西方思想体系在学院中的无处不在,并批评知识生产作为一种学科实践如何将种族定位为“边缘化知识”。这一理论为重新思考我们如何在学术界倡导和维护Blac/k奖学金提供了一个宝贵的起点。它考察了教育中种族主义的政治经济学如何提供一个变革性的地位,学者们可以从中为促进种族识字和种族尊严的潜在系统性变革做出贡献,以及促进这些变革所需的条件。发现这篇论文证实了Blac/k学者的研究已经强调的内容:种族化的知识被标记为——作为美学的补充或破坏性的——或不必要的——以及这些殖民欲望模式是如何在课堂或种族话语中表现出来的。独创性/价值具体而言,本文中的论点考察了两个理论不足的概念,即“种族尊严”和“创伤色情”,以期重新构想教育中的种族素养实践。这为思考这种教育形式如何促进澳大利亚持续的定居者殖民主义提供了一个有益的起点。然后,作者在社会工作教育中提出了一种反种族主义的教学实践,包括三个核心的关键和变革要素:自我反思、讲故事和与Blac/k人的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pedagogy or “trauma porn”? Racial literacy as a prerequisite for teaching racially dignifying content in the Australian social work context
Purpose On June 21, 2021, a motion was introduced to the Australian Senate calling on the federal government to reject critical race theory (CRT) from the national curriculum, claiming that CRT is divisive and racist. This was allegedly sparked by revisions to the national school curriculum, which included a more accurate reflection of the historical record of First Nations peoples’ experiences of colonisation and the framing of British arrival onto the continent as an invasion. This paper aims to overview the omnipresence of Western thought systems in the academy and critiques how knowledge production as a disciplinary practice positions race as a “marginalised knowledge”. Design/methodology/approach This paper is conceptual and it theorises the morphology and functions of racism within the Australian education system specifically, and across the board. This theorisation offers an invaluable starting point in rethinking how we advocate for and preserve Blac/k scholarship in academia. It examines how the political economy of racism in education offers a transformative position from which scholars can contribute to potential systemic change that promotes racial literacy and racial dignity, and the conditions necessary to foster these changes. Findings The paper confirms what studies by Blac/k scholars already highlight: that racialised knowledges are marked – as an aesthetic addition or as disruptive – or unnecessary – and how these patterns of colonial desires are manifested in the classroom or in race discourse. Originality/value Specifically, the arguments made in this paper examine two undertheorised concepts, namely, “racial dignity” and “trauma porn” to foreground the reimagination of practices that inform racial literacy in education. This offers a helpful starting place to consider how this form of education facilitates ongoing settler colonialism in Australia. The authors then propose an anti-racist pedagogical practice in social work education entailing three core crucial and transformative elements: self- reflexivity, storytelling and collaboration with Blac/k people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Multicultural Education
Journal for Multicultural Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal for Multicultural Education is a double-blind peer reviewed journal. Published quarterly, the editorial objectives and coverage focus on: Fostering research into the management of multicultural education, understanding multicultural education in the context of teacher-learner equity and enabling learners to collaborate more effectively across ethnic, cultural and linguistic lines. Topics covered include: -Intercultural education- Inclusive education- Urban education- Diversity in education- Ethnicity in education- Gender and education- Disability and education- Technology and Multicultural education The journal is international in coverage and publishes original, theoretical and applied articles by leading scholars, expert consultants and respected practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信