新视野:新兴学者的记录和档案写作

IF 1.3 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
L. Summers, L. Millar, D. Force
{"title":"新视野:新兴学者的记录和档案写作","authors":"L. Summers, L. Millar, D. Force","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2019.1563467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In February 2018, Archives & Manuscripts invited submissions for a special theme issue dedicated to research and writing from emerging scholars and new professionals. The call was broad, and the response was inspiring. We, the guest editors, Lise Summers, Laura Millar and Donald Force, are pleased and proud to see the fascinating and diverse articles published in this issue, which offer a small window into the high-quality scholarship underway right now by the next generation of recordkeeping and archives professionals around the world. The guest editors, all records and archives educators at one time or another in Australia, Canada and the United States, wanted to provide a forum for ‘emerging scholars’: new professionals who may have written essays or dissertations but perhaps never before published in a professional journal. To support the newest of the new, we set clear boundaries around the concept of ‘emerging scholar’. We welcomed submissions from undergraduate, graduate or postgraduate students, or recent graduates from archives, records, or information studies programs within Australia or around the world. Our definition of ‘recent’ was tight: the graduate should have completed study within the previous two years, with a similar constraint on time in the profession, either as a practitioner or educator. The topics available to consider were virtually limitless, though: authors were encouraged to write on any and all aspects of records, archives, and information concepts, theories and principles; from historical studies to digital preservation analyses; to discussions of theory and case studies from research initiatives. Even though we focused our target population precisely – current students, recent graduates and ‘new’ scholars, not long-time practitioners – we were thrilled to receive 73 submissions from every corner of the world: from Australia to Canada, the United States, Africa, Europe, Indonesia and beyond. The proposals were fascinating. The challenge of developing a shortlist was daunting. So many of the papers had resonances with the challenges facing archives and recordkeepers in today’s political climate, not just in Australia but internationally. As we worked through the adjudication process, we kept our focus clearly on emerging scholars. Some authors were more seasoned professionals who did not quite fit the ‘emerging scholars’ definition; we have encouraged them to consider submitting their proposals for another issue of Archives & Manuscripts. Some authors were undertaking very complex research, often dependent on case study research, computer analysis and other tasks that no one could guarantee would be finished in quick order. When we felt the author might not be able to complete their analysis within the time frame for the special issue, we urged them to submit to the journal again when their projects were finished. We hope they do! Other proposals, while fascinating, focused on a limited regional area or institutional matter. We felt that the scope of study would need to be ARCHIVES AND MANUSCRIPTS 2018, VOL. 46, NO. 3, 251–254 https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1563467","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"46 1","pages":"251 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2019.1563467","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New horizons: writing on records and archives from emerging scholars\",\"authors\":\"L. Summers, L. Millar, D. Force\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01576895.2019.1563467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In February 2018, Archives & Manuscripts invited submissions for a special theme issue dedicated to research and writing from emerging scholars and new professionals. The call was broad, and the response was inspiring. We, the guest editors, Lise Summers, Laura Millar and Donald Force, are pleased and proud to see the fascinating and diverse articles published in this issue, which offer a small window into the high-quality scholarship underway right now by the next generation of recordkeeping and archives professionals around the world. The guest editors, all records and archives educators at one time or another in Australia, Canada and the United States, wanted to provide a forum for ‘emerging scholars’: new professionals who may have written essays or dissertations but perhaps never before published in a professional journal. To support the newest of the new, we set clear boundaries around the concept of ‘emerging scholar’. We welcomed submissions from undergraduate, graduate or postgraduate students, or recent graduates from archives, records, or information studies programs within Australia or around the world. Our definition of ‘recent’ was tight: the graduate should have completed study within the previous two years, with a similar constraint on time in the profession, either as a practitioner or educator. The topics available to consider were virtually limitless, though: authors were encouraged to write on any and all aspects of records, archives, and information concepts, theories and principles; from historical studies to digital preservation analyses; to discussions of theory and case studies from research initiatives. Even though we focused our target population precisely – current students, recent graduates and ‘new’ scholars, not long-time practitioners – we were thrilled to receive 73 submissions from every corner of the world: from Australia to Canada, the United States, Africa, Europe, Indonesia and beyond. The proposals were fascinating. The challenge of developing a shortlist was daunting. So many of the papers had resonances with the challenges facing archives and recordkeepers in today’s political climate, not just in Australia but internationally. As we worked through the adjudication process, we kept our focus clearly on emerging scholars. Some authors were more seasoned professionals who did not quite fit the ‘emerging scholars’ definition; we have encouraged them to consider submitting their proposals for another issue of Archives & Manuscripts. Some authors were undertaking very complex research, often dependent on case study research, computer analysis and other tasks that no one could guarantee would be finished in quick order. When we felt the author might not be able to complete their analysis within the time frame for the special issue, we urged them to submit to the journal again when their projects were finished. We hope they do! Other proposals, while fascinating, focused on a limited regional area or institutional matter. We felt that the scope of study would need to be ARCHIVES AND MANUSCRIPTS 2018, VOL. 46, NO. 3, 251–254 https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1563467\",\"PeriodicalId\":43371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives and Manuscripts\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"251 - 254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2019.1563467\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives and Manuscripts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1563467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives and Manuscripts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1563467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2018年2月,《档案与手稿》杂志邀请新兴学者和新专业人士为研究和写作撰写专题刊物。这个呼吁很广泛,反响也很鼓舞人心。我们,客座编辑Lise Summers, Laura Millar和Donald Force,很高兴和自豪地看到这期杂志上发表的迷人而多样的文章,这些文章为我们提供了一个小窗口,让我们了解世界各地下一代记录保存和档案专业人士正在进行的高质量学术研究。特邀编辑都是澳大利亚、加拿大和美国的记录和档案教育工作者,他们希望为“新兴学者”提供一个论坛:新专业人士可能写过论文或论文,但可能从未在专业期刊上发表过。为了支持最新的新学者,我们围绕“新兴学者”的概念设定了明确的界限。我们欢迎来自澳大利亚或世界各地的档案、记录或信息研究项目的本科生、研究生或研究生或应届毕业生提交。我们对“近期”的定义很严格:毕业生应该在过去两年内完成学业,无论是作为从业者还是作为教育工作者,都有类似的时间限制。然而,可供考虑的主题实际上是无限的:鼓励作者就记录、档案和信息概念、理论和原则的任何和所有方面进行写作;从历史研究到数字保存分析;讨论来自研究项目的理论和案例研究。尽管我们的目标人群很精确——在校学生、应届毕业生和“新”学者,而不是长期从业人员——但我们还是很高兴地收到了来自世界各地的73份申请:从澳大利亚到加拿大、美国、非洲、欧洲、印度尼西亚等。这些建议很吸引人。制定一个候选名单的挑战是艰巨的。许多文件都与当今政治气候下档案和记录管理员面临的挑战产生了共鸣,不仅在澳大利亚,而且在国际上。在评审过程中,我们一直把重点放在新兴学者身上。一些作者是经验丰富的专业人士,不太符合“新兴学者”的定义;我们鼓励他们考虑向另一期的《档案与手稿》提交他们的提案。一些作者正在进行非常复杂的研究,通常依赖于案例研究、计算机分析和其他没有人能保证能快速完成的任务。当我们觉得作者可能无法在特刊的时间框架内完成分析时,我们会敦促他们在项目完成后再次投稿。我们希望他们能做到!其他的建议虽然很吸引人,但都集中在有限的区域或制度问题上。我们认为研究的范围需要是ARCHIVES AND manuscript 2018, VOL. 46, NO. 5。3,251 - 254 https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1563467
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New horizons: writing on records and archives from emerging scholars
In February 2018, Archives & Manuscripts invited submissions for a special theme issue dedicated to research and writing from emerging scholars and new professionals. The call was broad, and the response was inspiring. We, the guest editors, Lise Summers, Laura Millar and Donald Force, are pleased and proud to see the fascinating and diverse articles published in this issue, which offer a small window into the high-quality scholarship underway right now by the next generation of recordkeeping and archives professionals around the world. The guest editors, all records and archives educators at one time or another in Australia, Canada and the United States, wanted to provide a forum for ‘emerging scholars’: new professionals who may have written essays or dissertations but perhaps never before published in a professional journal. To support the newest of the new, we set clear boundaries around the concept of ‘emerging scholar’. We welcomed submissions from undergraduate, graduate or postgraduate students, or recent graduates from archives, records, or information studies programs within Australia or around the world. Our definition of ‘recent’ was tight: the graduate should have completed study within the previous two years, with a similar constraint on time in the profession, either as a practitioner or educator. The topics available to consider were virtually limitless, though: authors were encouraged to write on any and all aspects of records, archives, and information concepts, theories and principles; from historical studies to digital preservation analyses; to discussions of theory and case studies from research initiatives. Even though we focused our target population precisely – current students, recent graduates and ‘new’ scholars, not long-time practitioners – we were thrilled to receive 73 submissions from every corner of the world: from Australia to Canada, the United States, Africa, Europe, Indonesia and beyond. The proposals were fascinating. The challenge of developing a shortlist was daunting. So many of the papers had resonances with the challenges facing archives and recordkeepers in today’s political climate, not just in Australia but internationally. As we worked through the adjudication process, we kept our focus clearly on emerging scholars. Some authors were more seasoned professionals who did not quite fit the ‘emerging scholars’ definition; we have encouraged them to consider submitting their proposals for another issue of Archives & Manuscripts. Some authors were undertaking very complex research, often dependent on case study research, computer analysis and other tasks that no one could guarantee would be finished in quick order. When we felt the author might not be able to complete their analysis within the time frame for the special issue, we urged them to submit to the journal again when their projects were finished. We hope they do! Other proposals, while fascinating, focused on a limited regional area or institutional matter. We felt that the scope of study would need to be ARCHIVES AND MANUSCRIPTS 2018, VOL. 46, NO. 3, 251–254 https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1563467
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives and Manuscripts
Archives and Manuscripts INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信