{"title":"图为树的可对角化矩阵:不同特征值的最小数目和特征值赋值的可行性","authors":"Carlos M. Saiago","doi":"10.1515/spma-2019-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Considered are combinatorially symmetric matrices, whose graph is a given tree, in view of the fact recent analysis shows that the geometric multiplicity theory for the eigenvalues of such matrices closely parallels that for real symmetric (and complex Hermitian) matrices. In contrast to the real symmetric case, it is shown that (a) the smallest example (13 vertices) of a tree and multiplicity list (3, 3, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1) meeting standard necessary conditions that has no real symmetric realizations does have a diagonalizable realization and for arbitrary prescribed (real and multiple) eigenvalues, and (b) that all trees with diameter < 8 are geometrically di-minimal (i.e., have diagonalizable realizations with as few of distinct eigenvalues as the diameter). This re-raises natural questions about multiplicity lists that proved subtly false in the real symmetric case. What is their status in the geometric multiplicity list case?","PeriodicalId":43276,"journal":{"name":"Special Matrices","volume":"7 1","pages":"316 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/spma-2019-0025","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagonalizable matrices whose graph is a tree: the minimum number of distinct eigenvalues and the feasibility of eigenvalue assignments\",\"authors\":\"Carlos M. Saiago\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/spma-2019-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Considered are combinatorially symmetric matrices, whose graph is a given tree, in view of the fact recent analysis shows that the geometric multiplicity theory for the eigenvalues of such matrices closely parallels that for real symmetric (and complex Hermitian) matrices. In contrast to the real symmetric case, it is shown that (a) the smallest example (13 vertices) of a tree and multiplicity list (3, 3, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1) meeting standard necessary conditions that has no real symmetric realizations does have a diagonalizable realization and for arbitrary prescribed (real and multiple) eigenvalues, and (b) that all trees with diameter < 8 are geometrically di-minimal (i.e., have diagonalizable realizations with as few of distinct eigenvalues as the diameter). This re-raises natural questions about multiplicity lists that proved subtly false in the real symmetric case. What is their status in the geometric multiplicity list case?\",\"PeriodicalId\":43276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Special Matrices\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"316 - 326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/spma-2019-0025\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Special Matrices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/spma-2019-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Matrices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/spma-2019-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagonalizable matrices whose graph is a tree: the minimum number of distinct eigenvalues and the feasibility of eigenvalue assignments
Abstract Considered are combinatorially symmetric matrices, whose graph is a given tree, in view of the fact recent analysis shows that the geometric multiplicity theory for the eigenvalues of such matrices closely parallels that for real symmetric (and complex Hermitian) matrices. In contrast to the real symmetric case, it is shown that (a) the smallest example (13 vertices) of a tree and multiplicity list (3, 3, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1) meeting standard necessary conditions that has no real symmetric realizations does have a diagonalizable realization and for arbitrary prescribed (real and multiple) eigenvalues, and (b) that all trees with diameter < 8 are geometrically di-minimal (i.e., have diagonalizable realizations with as few of distinct eigenvalues as the diameter). This re-raises natural questions about multiplicity lists that proved subtly false in the real symmetric case. What is their status in the geometric multiplicity list case?
期刊介绍:
Special Matrices publishes original articles of wide significance and originality in all areas of research involving structured matrices present in various branches of pure and applied mathematics and their noteworthy applications in physics, engineering, and other sciences. Special Matrices provides a hub for all researchers working across structured matrices to present their discoveries, and to be a forum for the discussion of the important issues in this vibrant area of matrix theory. Special Matrices brings together in one place major contributions to structured matrices and their applications. All the manuscripts are considered by originality, scientific importance and interest to a general mathematical audience. The journal also provides secure archiving by De Gruyter and the independent archiving service Portico.