{"title":"十篇重要的海湾三角洲文章","authors":"Ted R. Sommer, J. L. Conrad, S. Culberson","doi":"10.15447/SFEWS.2019V17ISS2ART1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For newcomers and veteran scientists alike, Bay– Delta science is daunting. The number of research and management issues is exceptional, and the scientific literature is well developed but fragmented. There is a substantial history of periodic reviews of Bay–Delta science and policy issues. Between 1979 and 1986 the first widely circulated reviews were published, focused on Bay processes (Conomos 1979) and issues (Kockelman et al 1982; Nichols et al 1986). Similar publications in the midto late1990s built substantially on this body of knowledge (e.g., Hollibaugh 1996; van Geen and Luoma 1999). The CALFED Bay–Delta program shifted much of the focus to the Delta, resulting in sponsored white papers on major issues in the mid-2000s (e.g., Brown 2003; Kimmerer 2004; Bennett 2005; Williams 2006). The first “State of Bay–Delta Science” was published in 2008 (Healey et al. 2008). The most recent update of the State of Bay–Delta Science (Healey et al. 2016a, 2016b, and accompanying articles) considered species of concern (Delta Smelt, Chinook Salmon), processes (fish predation, nutrient dynamics, food webs, flow and transport), stressors (contaminant effects, climate change), tools (multidimensional models), and human uses and effects on the Delta (Delta landscapes, climate change, agricultural and urban water supply, and the levee system). Other comprehensive overviews are also available; for example, IEP (2015), Johnson et al. (2017), and Sherman et al. (2017). Together, these reviews and the studies they cite give a sense of the historical development of scientific understanding in the Bay–Delta, and provide conceptual models for species’ or system ecology. Many of the papers are themselves scientific milestones, and provided a science foundation for current Bay–Delta current management actions (e.g., Delta Smelt Resiliency Strategy, CNRA 2016; and Sacramento Valley Salmon Resiliency Strategy, CNRA 2017). ESSAY","PeriodicalId":38364,"journal":{"name":"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15447/SFEWS.2019V17ISS2ART1","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten Essential Bay‒Delta Articles\",\"authors\":\"Ted R. Sommer, J. L. Conrad, S. Culberson\",\"doi\":\"10.15447/SFEWS.2019V17ISS2ART1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For newcomers and veteran scientists alike, Bay– Delta science is daunting. The number of research and management issues is exceptional, and the scientific literature is well developed but fragmented. There is a substantial history of periodic reviews of Bay–Delta science and policy issues. Between 1979 and 1986 the first widely circulated reviews were published, focused on Bay processes (Conomos 1979) and issues (Kockelman et al 1982; Nichols et al 1986). Similar publications in the midto late1990s built substantially on this body of knowledge (e.g., Hollibaugh 1996; van Geen and Luoma 1999). The CALFED Bay–Delta program shifted much of the focus to the Delta, resulting in sponsored white papers on major issues in the mid-2000s (e.g., Brown 2003; Kimmerer 2004; Bennett 2005; Williams 2006). The first “State of Bay–Delta Science” was published in 2008 (Healey et al. 2008). The most recent update of the State of Bay–Delta Science (Healey et al. 2016a, 2016b, and accompanying articles) considered species of concern (Delta Smelt, Chinook Salmon), processes (fish predation, nutrient dynamics, food webs, flow and transport), stressors (contaminant effects, climate change), tools (multidimensional models), and human uses and effects on the Delta (Delta landscapes, climate change, agricultural and urban water supply, and the levee system). Other comprehensive overviews are also available; for example, IEP (2015), Johnson et al. (2017), and Sherman et al. (2017). Together, these reviews and the studies they cite give a sense of the historical development of scientific understanding in the Bay–Delta, and provide conceptual models for species’ or system ecology. Many of the papers are themselves scientific milestones, and provided a science foundation for current Bay–Delta current management actions (e.g., Delta Smelt Resiliency Strategy, CNRA 2016; and Sacramento Valley Salmon Resiliency Strategy, CNRA 2017). ESSAY\",\"PeriodicalId\":38364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15447/SFEWS.2019V17ISS2ART1\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15447/SFEWS.2019V17ISS2ART1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15447/SFEWS.2019V17ISS2ART1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
对于新手和资深科学家来说,海湾三角洲的科学都是令人生畏的。研究和管理问题的数量非常多,科学文献发展得很好,但很分散。对海湾三角洲科学和政策问题进行定期审查的历史相当悠久。1979年至1986年间,第一批广泛流传的评论发表了,重点是海湾过程(Conomos 1979)和问题(Kockelman et al 1982;Nichols et al 1986)。20世纪90年代中后期的类似出版物基本上建立在这一知识体系的基础上(例如,Hollibaugh 1996;van Geen and Luoma 1999)。CALFED的海湾三角洲项目将大部分焦点转移到了三角洲地区,导致在2000年代中期发表了关于主要问题的白皮书(例如,Brown 2003;Kimmerer 2004;班尼特2005;威廉姆斯2006)。第一份“海湾三角洲科学状况”发表于2008年(Healey et al. 2008)。海湾三角洲科学状况的最新更新(Healey et al. 2016a, 2016b及相关文章)考虑了关注的物种(三角洲胡瓜鱼,奇诺克鲑鱼),过程(鱼类捕食,营养动态,食物网,流量和运输),压力源(污染物影响,气候变化),工具(多维模型)以及人类对三角洲的使用和影响(三角洲景观,气候变化,农业和城市供水,以及堤岸系统)。其他全面的概述也可用;例如,IEP (2015), Johnson等人(2017)和Sherman等人(2017)。总之,这些综述和他们引用的研究提供了对海湾三角洲科学认识的历史发展的感觉,并为物种或系统生态学提供了概念模型。许多论文本身就是科学里程碑,并为当前海湾三角洲当前管理行动提供了科学基础(例如,三角洲冶炼弹性战略,CNRA 2016;和萨克拉门托山谷鲑鱼恢复战略,CNRA 2017)。文章
For newcomers and veteran scientists alike, Bay– Delta science is daunting. The number of research and management issues is exceptional, and the scientific literature is well developed but fragmented. There is a substantial history of periodic reviews of Bay–Delta science and policy issues. Between 1979 and 1986 the first widely circulated reviews were published, focused on Bay processes (Conomos 1979) and issues (Kockelman et al 1982; Nichols et al 1986). Similar publications in the midto late1990s built substantially on this body of knowledge (e.g., Hollibaugh 1996; van Geen and Luoma 1999). The CALFED Bay–Delta program shifted much of the focus to the Delta, resulting in sponsored white papers on major issues in the mid-2000s (e.g., Brown 2003; Kimmerer 2004; Bennett 2005; Williams 2006). The first “State of Bay–Delta Science” was published in 2008 (Healey et al. 2008). The most recent update of the State of Bay–Delta Science (Healey et al. 2016a, 2016b, and accompanying articles) considered species of concern (Delta Smelt, Chinook Salmon), processes (fish predation, nutrient dynamics, food webs, flow and transport), stressors (contaminant effects, climate change), tools (multidimensional models), and human uses and effects on the Delta (Delta landscapes, climate change, agricultural and urban water supply, and the levee system). Other comprehensive overviews are also available; for example, IEP (2015), Johnson et al. (2017), and Sherman et al. (2017). Together, these reviews and the studies they cite give a sense of the historical development of scientific understanding in the Bay–Delta, and provide conceptual models for species’ or system ecology. Many of the papers are themselves scientific milestones, and provided a science foundation for current Bay–Delta current management actions (e.g., Delta Smelt Resiliency Strategy, CNRA 2016; and Sacramento Valley Salmon Resiliency Strategy, CNRA 2017). ESSAY