从叛逆的利己主义者到顺从的公民：有桥吗？为什么会有桥？

Q1 Arts and Humanities

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.5325/jaynrandstud.20.2.0372

R. Long

{"title":"从叛逆的利己主义者到顺从的公民：有桥吗？为什么会有桥？","authors":"R. Long","doi":"10.5325/jaynrandstud.20.2.0372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The author reviews Foundations of a Free Society: Reflections on Ayn Rand's Political Philosophy, edited by Gregory Salmieri and Robert Mayhew, and finds it to be a rich and provocative anthology. However, the author is unpersuaded by the arguments, from a number of the contributors, for separating the prohibition on initiatory force as an ethical principle, from individual rights as a political principle—a separation that, on the ethical side, unduly discards the Aristotelean ethical approach with which Randian ethics claims affiliation, and on the political side, is employed to ground an unconvincing case for the legitimacy of the state.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"372 - 399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Defiant Egoist to Submissive Citizen: Is There a Bridge? Why the Hell Is There a Bridge?\",\"authors\":\"R. Long\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/jaynrandstud.20.2.0372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:The author reviews Foundations of a Free Society: Reflections on Ayn Rand's Political Philosophy, edited by Gregory Salmieri and Robert Mayhew, and finds it to be a rich and provocative anthology. However, the author is unpersuaded by the arguments, from a number of the contributors, for separating the prohibition on initiatory force as an ethical principle, from individual rights as a political principle—a separation that, on the ethical side, unduly discards the Aristotelean ethical approach with which Randian ethics claims affiliation, and on the political side, is employed to ground an unconvincing case for the legitimacy of the state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"372 - 399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/jaynrandstud.20.2.0372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jaynrandstud.20.2.0372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

文摘：作者回顾了格雷戈里·萨尔米埃里和罗伯特·梅休主编的《自由社会的基础：对安·兰德政治哲学的反思》，认为这是一本丰富而富有煽动性的选集。然而，作者对许多撰稿人的论点并不信服，他们认为，将禁止初始武力作为一项伦理原则，将个人权利作为一项政治原则进行分离——这种分离在伦理方面不适当地抛弃了亚里士多德式的伦理方法，而在政治方面，被用来为国家的合法性辩护。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

From Defiant Egoist to Submissive Citizen: Is There a Bridge? Why the Hell Is There a Bridge?

abstract:The author reviews Foundations of a Free Society: Reflections on Ayn Rand's Political Philosophy, edited by Gregory Salmieri and Robert Mayhew, and finds it to be a rich and provocative anthology. However, the author is unpersuaded by the arguments, from a number of the contributors, for separating the prohibition on initiatory force as an ethical principle, from individual rights as a political principle—a separation that, on the ethical side, unduly discards the Aristotelean ethical approach with which Randian ethics claims affiliation, and on the political side, is employed to ground an unconvincing case for the legitimacy of the state.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation has entered into an electronic licensing relationship with EBSCO Publishing, the world"s most prolific aggregator of full-text journals, magazines, and other sources. The full text of The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies can be found on EBSCO Publishing"s databases. A nonpartisan journal devoted to the study of Ayn Rand and her times. The journal is not aligned with any advocacy group, institute, or person. It welcomes papers from every discipline and from a variety of interpretive and critical perspectives. It aims to foster scholarly dialogue through a respectful exchange of ideas. The journal is published semi-annually, in the fall and the spring.