国际艺术社会心理研究中批判性思维发展的对话反思

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sharon Snir, T. Gavron
{"title":"国际艺术社会心理研究中批判性思维发展的对话反思","authors":"Sharon Snir, T. Gavron","doi":"10.1080/17454832.2023.2217889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background In recent years, in the face of natural disasters, mass migration and war in a globalising world, professionals from Western societies are conducting art-based psychosocial interventions to support struggling communities. The human encounters that take place during these interventions and the subsequent examination of these encounters by researchers are saddled with power dynamics and cultural differences. A critical stance is required to better address the complex issues of power and oppression that surface; a more authentic framework can make room for cultural humility. Aims In this joint dialogical-heuristic research, we describe our critical thinking on cross-cultural research pertaining to art-based, psychosocial and cross-cultural interventions. Methods This heuristic study involved analysing transcripts of the two researchers` dialogic reflection (DR) following their interviews with Filipino women, participants of an IsraAID group training programme in the aftermath of the Yolanda Typhon. Results The results describe our thoughts on conducting cross-cultural art-based research and the meaning of DR in this context, and focus on three main themes: the evolution and accuracy of the research during data collection; our self-reflection as researchers, and our experience in this cross-cultural setting. Conclusions The use of art and DR in art-based cross-cultural qualitative research adds value to the discourse on cultural humility. Implications for practice The discussion includes recommendations for using an ongoing process of reflection to facilitate active negotiation of the researchers’ position during the research process, and to enable questions that can better steer the study and promote sensitivity to cross-cultural dilemmas. Plain-language summary In recent years, in the wake of natural disasters, mass immigration and military conflicts across the globe, professionals from the Western world are conducting art-based psychosocial interventions designed to support struggling communities. Power dynamics and cultural differences have a clear impact on these human encounters and subsequent research of these interventions. Complex issues of power and oppression can be better addressed by adopting a critical stance and enabling an authentic framework that can promote a position of cultural humility. In this joint dialogical-heuristic research, we present our critical thinking in regard to a cross-cultural study of art-based psychosocial cross-cultural interventions. We analysed transcripts of dialogic reflection (DR) that we engaged in after interviewing Filipino women who participated in an IsraAid group training programme in the aftermath of the Yolanda Typhon. The results present our insights on cross-cultural, art-based research and the significance of DR in this process, and focus on three main themes: the evolution and accuracy of the data collection process, our self-reflection as researchers, and our experience in this cross-cultural setting. The discussion focusses on the advantages of using art and DR in an art-based cross-cultural, qualitative study. Possible applications are presented, along with recommendations for the use of an ongoing reflection process that facilitates the active negotiation of the researchers’ position during the research process and enables questions that can steer the study in the right direction and promote sensitivity to cross-cultural dilemmas.","PeriodicalId":39969,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Art Therapy: Inscape","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dialogic-reflection for the development of critical thinking in international art-based psychosocial research\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Snir, T. Gavron\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17454832.2023.2217889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background In recent years, in the face of natural disasters, mass migration and war in a globalising world, professionals from Western societies are conducting art-based psychosocial interventions to support struggling communities. The human encounters that take place during these interventions and the subsequent examination of these encounters by researchers are saddled with power dynamics and cultural differences. A critical stance is required to better address the complex issues of power and oppression that surface; a more authentic framework can make room for cultural humility. Aims In this joint dialogical-heuristic research, we describe our critical thinking on cross-cultural research pertaining to art-based, psychosocial and cross-cultural interventions. Methods This heuristic study involved analysing transcripts of the two researchers` dialogic reflection (DR) following their interviews with Filipino women, participants of an IsraAID group training programme in the aftermath of the Yolanda Typhon. Results The results describe our thoughts on conducting cross-cultural art-based research and the meaning of DR in this context, and focus on three main themes: the evolution and accuracy of the research during data collection; our self-reflection as researchers, and our experience in this cross-cultural setting. Conclusions The use of art and DR in art-based cross-cultural qualitative research adds value to the discourse on cultural humility. Implications for practice The discussion includes recommendations for using an ongoing process of reflection to facilitate active negotiation of the researchers’ position during the research process, and to enable questions that can better steer the study and promote sensitivity to cross-cultural dilemmas. Plain-language summary In recent years, in the wake of natural disasters, mass immigration and military conflicts across the globe, professionals from the Western world are conducting art-based psychosocial interventions designed to support struggling communities. Power dynamics and cultural differences have a clear impact on these human encounters and subsequent research of these interventions. Complex issues of power and oppression can be better addressed by adopting a critical stance and enabling an authentic framework that can promote a position of cultural humility. In this joint dialogical-heuristic research, we present our critical thinking in regard to a cross-cultural study of art-based psychosocial cross-cultural interventions. We analysed transcripts of dialogic reflection (DR) that we engaged in after interviewing Filipino women who participated in an IsraAid group training programme in the aftermath of the Yolanda Typhon. The results present our insights on cross-cultural, art-based research and the significance of DR in this process, and focus on three main themes: the evolution and accuracy of the data collection process, our self-reflection as researchers, and our experience in this cross-cultural setting. The discussion focusses on the advantages of using art and DR in an art-based cross-cultural, qualitative study. Possible applications are presented, along with recommendations for the use of an ongoing reflection process that facilitates the active negotiation of the researchers’ position during the research process and enables questions that can steer the study in the right direction and promote sensitivity to cross-cultural dilemmas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Art Therapy: Inscape\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Art Therapy: Inscape\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17454832.2023.2217889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Art Therapy: Inscape","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17454832.2023.2217889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dialogic-reflection for the development of critical thinking in international art-based psychosocial research
ABSTRACT Background In recent years, in the face of natural disasters, mass migration and war in a globalising world, professionals from Western societies are conducting art-based psychosocial interventions to support struggling communities. The human encounters that take place during these interventions and the subsequent examination of these encounters by researchers are saddled with power dynamics and cultural differences. A critical stance is required to better address the complex issues of power and oppression that surface; a more authentic framework can make room for cultural humility. Aims In this joint dialogical-heuristic research, we describe our critical thinking on cross-cultural research pertaining to art-based, psychosocial and cross-cultural interventions. Methods This heuristic study involved analysing transcripts of the two researchers` dialogic reflection (DR) following their interviews with Filipino women, participants of an IsraAID group training programme in the aftermath of the Yolanda Typhon. Results The results describe our thoughts on conducting cross-cultural art-based research and the meaning of DR in this context, and focus on three main themes: the evolution and accuracy of the research during data collection; our self-reflection as researchers, and our experience in this cross-cultural setting. Conclusions The use of art and DR in art-based cross-cultural qualitative research adds value to the discourse on cultural humility. Implications for practice The discussion includes recommendations for using an ongoing process of reflection to facilitate active negotiation of the researchers’ position during the research process, and to enable questions that can better steer the study and promote sensitivity to cross-cultural dilemmas. Plain-language summary In recent years, in the wake of natural disasters, mass immigration and military conflicts across the globe, professionals from the Western world are conducting art-based psychosocial interventions designed to support struggling communities. Power dynamics and cultural differences have a clear impact on these human encounters and subsequent research of these interventions. Complex issues of power and oppression can be better addressed by adopting a critical stance and enabling an authentic framework that can promote a position of cultural humility. In this joint dialogical-heuristic research, we present our critical thinking in regard to a cross-cultural study of art-based psychosocial cross-cultural interventions. We analysed transcripts of dialogic reflection (DR) that we engaged in after interviewing Filipino women who participated in an IsraAid group training programme in the aftermath of the Yolanda Typhon. The results present our insights on cross-cultural, art-based research and the significance of DR in this process, and focus on three main themes: the evolution and accuracy of the data collection process, our self-reflection as researchers, and our experience in this cross-cultural setting. The discussion focusses on the advantages of using art and DR in an art-based cross-cultural, qualitative study. Possible applications are presented, along with recommendations for the use of an ongoing reflection process that facilitates the active negotiation of the researchers’ position during the research process and enables questions that can steer the study in the right direction and promote sensitivity to cross-cultural dilemmas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信