承认哥伦比亚的自然权利:阿特拉托河案。

Q4 Social Sciences
Iván Vargas Chaves, G. Rodríguez, Alexandra Cumbe Figueroa, Sandra Estefanía Mora Garzón
{"title":"承认哥伦比亚的自然权利:阿特拉托河案。","authors":"Iván Vargas Chaves, G. Rodríguez, Alexandra Cumbe Figueroa, Sandra Estefanía Mora Garzón","doi":"10.17151/JURID.2020.17.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article studies the recognition of Río Atrato as a subject of rights through Judgment T-622-16 of the Constitutional Court, in a case without precedent in Colombian Law. To contextualize this jurisprudential milestone, the authors argue that the current regulations failed to protect the biodiversity and related rights of the inhabitants of the areas near the Atrato River. The methodology involved an analysis of the jurisprudential line of the judgments that preceded the case analyzed, as well as the study of theoretical postulates and current environmental regulations from an analytical-deductive approach. As results, the authors present the first jurisprudential line of the Río Atrato judgment, supported by their own reflections that demonstrate the birth of a new stage of environmental law in Colombia.","PeriodicalId":38421,"journal":{"name":"Juridicas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognizing the rights of nature in Colombia : the Atrato river case.\",\"authors\":\"Iván Vargas Chaves, G. Rodríguez, Alexandra Cumbe Figueroa, Sandra Estefanía Mora Garzón\",\"doi\":\"10.17151/JURID.2020.17.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article studies the recognition of Río Atrato as a subject of rights through Judgment T-622-16 of the Constitutional Court, in a case without precedent in Colombian Law. To contextualize this jurisprudential milestone, the authors argue that the current regulations failed to protect the biodiversity and related rights of the inhabitants of the areas near the Atrato River. The methodology involved an analysis of the jurisprudential line of the judgments that preceded the case analyzed, as well as the study of theoretical postulates and current environmental regulations from an analytical-deductive approach. As results, the authors present the first jurisprudential line of the Río Atrato judgment, supported by their own reflections that demonstrate the birth of a new stage of environmental law in Colombia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridicas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridicas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17151/JURID.2020.17.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17151/JURID.2020.17.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文研究了宪法法院T-622-16号判决承认Río Atrato为权利主体的问题,这是哥伦比亚法律中没有先例的案件。为了将这一法律里程碑置于背景之下,作者认为,现行法规未能保护阿特拉托河附近地区居民的生物多样性和相关权利。该方法涉及对所分析案件之前判决的法理路线的分析,以及从分析演绎的方法对理论假设和当前环境法规的研究。因此,作者提出了Río Atrato判决的第一条法理路线,并得到了他们自己的思考的支持,这些思考证明了哥伦比亚环境法新阶段的诞生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recognizing the rights of nature in Colombia : the Atrato river case.
This article studies the recognition of Río Atrato as a subject of rights through Judgment T-622-16 of the Constitutional Court, in a case without precedent in Colombian Law. To contextualize this jurisprudential milestone, the authors argue that the current regulations failed to protect the biodiversity and related rights of the inhabitants of the areas near the Atrato River. The methodology involved an analysis of the jurisprudential line of the judgments that preceded the case analyzed, as well as the study of theoretical postulates and current environmental regulations from an analytical-deductive approach. As results, the authors present the first jurisprudential line of the Río Atrato judgment, supported by their own reflections that demonstrate the birth of a new stage of environmental law in Colombia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Juridicas
Juridicas Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista JURÍDICAS, a result of the effort of the professors and students of the University of Caldas and the invited academics, is oriented to the publication of unpublished essays and of high scientific quality that correspond, fundamentally, to results or advances of research projects, Articles Reflection, translations and bibliographical reviews related to the development of legal science and the state of the art in the legal and socio-legal fields. It aims to contribute to the consolidation of a permanent intellectual production that disseminates legal knowledge in the areas of regional, national and international.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信