{"title":"从仁慈到赋权?!论包容伦理标准的神学发展","authors":"Frank Martin Brunn","doi":"10.14315/zee-2020-640406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I describe the structural weakness of a diaconal ethos based on the value of mercy. Theologically justified, it should be outbid by an ethos of empowerment that aims at strengthening autonomy. I start with a description of the historical challenges that theological ethics are facing when it comes to people with disabilities and their inclusion. Then I present the inherent asymmetrical structure of mercy, which tends towards paternalism. I oppose paternalism with a understanding of autonomy, which is inspired by the Phenomenology of embodiment. I interpret this in the light of the theology of the cross and its phenomenological implications. Finally, I derive ethical criteria for inclusion.","PeriodicalId":41129,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVANGELISCHE ETHIK","volume":"64 1","pages":"263 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Von der Barmherzigkeit zum Empowerment?! Zur theologischen Entwicklung ethischer Kriterien der Inklusion\",\"authors\":\"Frank Martin Brunn\",\"doi\":\"10.14315/zee-2020-640406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article I describe the structural weakness of a diaconal ethos based on the value of mercy. Theologically justified, it should be outbid by an ethos of empowerment that aims at strengthening autonomy. I start with a description of the historical challenges that theological ethics are facing when it comes to people with disabilities and their inclusion. Then I present the inherent asymmetrical structure of mercy, which tends towards paternalism. I oppose paternalism with a understanding of autonomy, which is inspired by the Phenomenology of embodiment. I interpret this in the light of the theology of the cross and its phenomenological implications. Finally, I derive ethical criteria for inclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVANGELISCHE ETHIK\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"263 - 276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVANGELISCHE ETHIK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14315/zee-2020-640406\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVANGELISCHE ETHIK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14315/zee-2020-640406","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Von der Barmherzigkeit zum Empowerment?! Zur theologischen Entwicklung ethischer Kriterien der Inklusion
In this article I describe the structural weakness of a diaconal ethos based on the value of mercy. Theologically justified, it should be outbid by an ethos of empowerment that aims at strengthening autonomy. I start with a description of the historical challenges that theological ethics are facing when it comes to people with disabilities and their inclusion. Then I present the inherent asymmetrical structure of mercy, which tends towards paternalism. I oppose paternalism with a understanding of autonomy, which is inspired by the Phenomenology of embodiment. I interpret this in the light of the theology of the cross and its phenomenological implications. Finally, I derive ethical criteria for inclusion.