重新审视竞争力:劳动力成本、资金流动和意大利的案例

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Sofía A. Pérez
{"title":"重新审视竞争力:劳动力成本、资金流动和意大利的案例","authors":"Sofía A. Pérez","doi":"10.1080/09644008.2021.1913724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Explanations of Italy's and Germany's position within the Eurozone commonly focus on trade ‘competitiveness,’ a concept measured in terms of unit labour costs. This trade-centric view offers a poor explanation for the evolution of the two countries external debt levels following the adoption of the Euro. It also fails to explain the external financial fragility that Italy has repeatedly experienced in the period since 2010. Both outcomes are better explained by dynamics in cross-border financial markets. Monetary union created large incentives for banks in the Eurozone's core states, including Germany, to direct funds to banks in the Eurozone's periphery (those countries whose banks had earlier faced higher currency-related risk premia in obtaining external financing). Domestic policy decisions in Germany further contributed to this outcome. In the period since 2010, the Eurozone's rules-based governance model and the failure of governments to create a common safe asset for banks became a major factor contributing to Italy's financial fragility. It remains to be seen whether Europe's response to the COVID-crisis will mark a watershed, and break these financial markets dynamics.","PeriodicalId":46640,"journal":{"name":"German Politics","volume":"30 1","pages":"340 - 359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09644008.2021.1913724","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competitiveness Revisited: Labour Costs, Financial Flows and the Case of Italy\",\"authors\":\"Sofía A. Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09644008.2021.1913724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Explanations of Italy's and Germany's position within the Eurozone commonly focus on trade ‘competitiveness,’ a concept measured in terms of unit labour costs. This trade-centric view offers a poor explanation for the evolution of the two countries external debt levels following the adoption of the Euro. It also fails to explain the external financial fragility that Italy has repeatedly experienced in the period since 2010. Both outcomes are better explained by dynamics in cross-border financial markets. Monetary union created large incentives for banks in the Eurozone's core states, including Germany, to direct funds to banks in the Eurozone's periphery (those countries whose banks had earlier faced higher currency-related risk premia in obtaining external financing). Domestic policy decisions in Germany further contributed to this outcome. In the period since 2010, the Eurozone's rules-based governance model and the failure of governments to create a common safe asset for banks became a major factor contributing to Italy's financial fragility. It remains to be seen whether Europe's response to the COVID-crisis will mark a watershed, and break these financial markets dynamics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German Politics\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"340 - 359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09644008.2021.1913724\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2021.1913724\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2021.1913724","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

对意大利和德国在欧元区地位的解释通常集中在贸易“竞争力”上,这是一个以单位劳动力成本衡量的概念。这种以贸易为中心的观点对采用欧元后两国外债水平的演变提供了糟糕的解释。它也未能解释意大利自2010年以来反复经历的外部金融脆弱性。跨境金融市场的动态可以更好地解释这两种结果。货币联盟为包括德国在内的欧元区核心国家的银行提供了大量激励措施,使其将资金直接投向欧元区外围国家的银行(这些国家的银行早些时候在获得外部融资时面临更高的货币相关风险溢价)。德国的国内政策决定进一步促成了这一结果。自2010年以来,欧元区基于规则的治理模式以及各国政府未能为银行创造共同的安全资产,成为导致意大利金融脆弱的主要因素。欧洲对新冠肺炎危机的反应是否会标志着一个分水岭,并打破这些金融市场的动态,还有待观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competitiveness Revisited: Labour Costs, Financial Flows and the Case of Italy
Explanations of Italy's and Germany's position within the Eurozone commonly focus on trade ‘competitiveness,’ a concept measured in terms of unit labour costs. This trade-centric view offers a poor explanation for the evolution of the two countries external debt levels following the adoption of the Euro. It also fails to explain the external financial fragility that Italy has repeatedly experienced in the period since 2010. Both outcomes are better explained by dynamics in cross-border financial markets. Monetary union created large incentives for banks in the Eurozone's core states, including Germany, to direct funds to banks in the Eurozone's periphery (those countries whose banks had earlier faced higher currency-related risk premia in obtaining external financing). Domestic policy decisions in Germany further contributed to this outcome. In the period since 2010, the Eurozone's rules-based governance model and the failure of governments to create a common safe asset for banks became a major factor contributing to Italy's financial fragility. It remains to be seen whether Europe's response to the COVID-crisis will mark a watershed, and break these financial markets dynamics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
German Politics
German Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信