巴西的同伴支持:包容、赋权和公民身份的经验和战略

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
C. M. Corradi-Webster, Graziela Reis, E. B. Brisola, C. Araujo, É. Ricci, Lívia Sicaroni Rufato, C. Sampaio, Mário César Rezende Andrade, J. Orsi, Rosa Alba Sarno Oliveira, Ana Lúcia Cidade, Políbio Campos, M. N. Costa
{"title":"巴西的同伴支持:包容、赋权和公民身份的经验和战略","authors":"C. M. Corradi-Webster, Graziela Reis, E. B. Brisola, C. Araujo, É. Ricci, Lívia Sicaroni Rufato, C. Sampaio, Mário César Rezende Andrade, J. Orsi, Rosa Alba Sarno Oliveira, Ana Lúcia Cidade, Políbio Campos, M. N. Costa","doi":"10.1108/jpmh-10-2022-0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to describe six recovery-oriented peer support experiences and strategies implemented in different regions of Brazil in the past 12 years, and explore challenges to their development and potential for empowerment and citizenship.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this paper, a group of stakeholders in mental health services involving people with lived experience of severe mental illness describe their experiences with services of peer support. These were all conducted in Brazil and in partnership with the International Recovery and Citizenship Collective (IRCC) and The Yale Program for Recovery and Community Health. The authors met monthly to exchange experiences, studies and practices, and six experiences were selected, described, analyzed and compared. A discussion of these experiences, their challenges, impact and potential followed.\n\n\nFindings\nThe explored experiences emphasize that peer support, lived experience leadership and advocacy are feasible in the Brazilian mental health system and can help advance the Brazilian Psychiatric Reform.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis paper is limited to the experience of researchers already engaged in peer support work in six cities in Brazil. Although they represent several different regions in Brazil, there are areas it has not reached. Further research should address and provide a broader view of peer support and recovery strategies spreading in the country.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThese experiences demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the recovering citizenship approach to reduce stigma, promote empowerment, autonomy, activism and advocacy, and increase a sense of belonging for those in recovery and marginalized by society. The Brazilian psychiatric reform can benefit from including peer supporters as mental health treatment providers.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper provides a novel view of the state of the art of peer support initiatives in Brazil and can inspire individuals, government and communities as they see and understand the breadth, depth and meanings of these peer support experiences.\n","PeriodicalId":45601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer support in Brazil: experiences and strategies of inclusion, empowerment and citizenship\",\"authors\":\"C. M. Corradi-Webster, Graziela Reis, E. B. Brisola, C. Araujo, É. Ricci, Lívia Sicaroni Rufato, C. Sampaio, Mário César Rezende Andrade, J. Orsi, Rosa Alba Sarno Oliveira, Ana Lúcia Cidade, Políbio Campos, M. N. Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jpmh-10-2022-0105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to describe six recovery-oriented peer support experiences and strategies implemented in different regions of Brazil in the past 12 years, and explore challenges to their development and potential for empowerment and citizenship.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nIn this paper, a group of stakeholders in mental health services involving people with lived experience of severe mental illness describe their experiences with services of peer support. These were all conducted in Brazil and in partnership with the International Recovery and Citizenship Collective (IRCC) and The Yale Program for Recovery and Community Health. The authors met monthly to exchange experiences, studies and practices, and six experiences were selected, described, analyzed and compared. A discussion of these experiences, their challenges, impact and potential followed.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe explored experiences emphasize that peer support, lived experience leadership and advocacy are feasible in the Brazilian mental health system and can help advance the Brazilian Psychiatric Reform.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis paper is limited to the experience of researchers already engaged in peer support work in six cities in Brazil. Although they represent several different regions in Brazil, there are areas it has not reached. Further research should address and provide a broader view of peer support and recovery strategies spreading in the country.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThese experiences demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the recovering citizenship approach to reduce stigma, promote empowerment, autonomy, activism and advocacy, and increase a sense of belonging for those in recovery and marginalized by society. The Brazilian psychiatric reform can benefit from including peer supporters as mental health treatment providers.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper provides a novel view of the state of the art of peer support initiatives in Brazil and can inspire individuals, government and communities as they see and understand the breadth, depth and meanings of these peer support experiences.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Mental Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-10-2022-0105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-10-2022-0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是描述过去12年中在巴西不同地区实施的六种以康复为导向的同伴支持经验和策略,并探讨其发展面临的挑战以及赋权和公民身份的潜力。设计/方法/方法在这篇论文中,一群心理健康服务的利益相关者,包括有严重精神疾病生活经历的人,描述了他们在同伴支持服务中的经历。这些都是在巴西进行的,并与国际康复和公民集体(IRCC)和耶鲁大学康复和社区卫生项目合作。作者每月举行一次会议,交流经验、研究和实践,选择、描述、分析和比较6个经验。随后讨论了这些经验、挑战、影响和潜力。研究结果表明,同伴支持、生活经验领导和倡导在巴西精神卫生系统中是可行的,有助于推进巴西精神病学改革。研究局限/启示本文仅限于已经在巴西六个城市从事同伴支持工作的研究人员的经验。虽然他们代表了巴西几个不同的地区,但也有一些地区还没有到达。进一步的研究应涉及并提供在该国传播的同伴支持和恢复战略的更广泛的观点。这些经验证明了恢复公民身份方法的可行性和可接受性,可以减少污名,促进赋权,自主,行动主义和倡导,并增加康复和被社会边缘化的人的归属感。巴西的精神病学改革可以受益于将同伴支持者作为精神健康治疗提供者。原创性/价值这篇论文提供了巴西同伴支持倡议的新观点,可以激励个人、政府和社区,因为他们看到和理解这些同伴支持经验的广度、深度和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peer support in Brazil: experiences and strategies of inclusion, empowerment and citizenship
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe six recovery-oriented peer support experiences and strategies implemented in different regions of Brazil in the past 12 years, and explore challenges to their development and potential for empowerment and citizenship. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, a group of stakeholders in mental health services involving people with lived experience of severe mental illness describe their experiences with services of peer support. These were all conducted in Brazil and in partnership with the International Recovery and Citizenship Collective (IRCC) and The Yale Program for Recovery and Community Health. The authors met monthly to exchange experiences, studies and practices, and six experiences were selected, described, analyzed and compared. A discussion of these experiences, their challenges, impact and potential followed. Findings The explored experiences emphasize that peer support, lived experience leadership and advocacy are feasible in the Brazilian mental health system and can help advance the Brazilian Psychiatric Reform. Research limitations/implications This paper is limited to the experience of researchers already engaged in peer support work in six cities in Brazil. Although they represent several different regions in Brazil, there are areas it has not reached. Further research should address and provide a broader view of peer support and recovery strategies spreading in the country. Social implications These experiences demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the recovering citizenship approach to reduce stigma, promote empowerment, autonomy, activism and advocacy, and increase a sense of belonging for those in recovery and marginalized by society. The Brazilian psychiatric reform can benefit from including peer supporters as mental health treatment providers. Originality/value This paper provides a novel view of the state of the art of peer support initiatives in Brazil and can inspire individuals, government and communities as they see and understand the breadth, depth and meanings of these peer support experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Mental Health
Journal of Public Mental Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信