得失重访:技能检测与相似性评估

SSRN Pub Date : 2022-09-10 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4077305
S. Browne
{"title":"得失重访:技能检测与相似性评估","authors":"S. Browne","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4077305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article develops an analytical framework that enables investors who use gain- and loss-based performance measures to evaluate and compare investment strategies or managers and to do so in a more precise manner that accounts for statistical uncertainty and sampling error. In particular, the article develops tests for detection of timing skill and sizing skill for individual strategies as well as tests to compare similarity across competing strategies or between different periods (e.g., backtest and live). Some of these tests are exact and therefore relevant for small samples or track records. The article illustrates the methodology throughout by applying these results to a suite of systematic strategy indexes.","PeriodicalId":74863,"journal":{"name":"SSRN","volume":"4 1","pages":"39 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gains and Losses Revisited: Skill Detection and Similarity Assessment\",\"authors\":\"S. Browne\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.4077305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article develops an analytical framework that enables investors who use gain- and loss-based performance measures to evaluate and compare investment strategies or managers and to do so in a more precise manner that accounts for statistical uncertainty and sampling error. In particular, the article develops tests for detection of timing skill and sizing skill for individual strategies as well as tests to compare similarity across competing strategies or between different periods (e.g., backtest and live). Some of these tests are exact and therefore relevant for small samples or track records. The article illustrates the methodology throughout by applying these results to a suite of systematic strategy indexes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSRN\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"39 - 71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSRN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4077305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSRN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4077305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文开发了一个分析框架,使投资者能够使用基于收益和损失的绩效指标来评估和比较投资策略或经理,并以更精确的方式进行评估和比较,以考虑统计不确定性和抽样误差。特别是,本文开发了检测单个策略的时机技巧和大小技巧的测试,以及比较竞争策略之间或不同时期(例如,回测和现场)的相似性的测试。其中一些测试是精确的,因此与小样本或跟踪记录相关。本文通过将这些结果应用于一套系统策略指标来说明该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gains and Losses Revisited: Skill Detection and Similarity Assessment
The article develops an analytical framework that enables investors who use gain- and loss-based performance measures to evaluate and compare investment strategies or managers and to do so in a more precise manner that accounts for statistical uncertainty and sampling error. In particular, the article develops tests for detection of timing skill and sizing skill for individual strategies as well as tests to compare similarity across competing strategies or between different periods (e.g., backtest and live). Some of these tests are exact and therefore relevant for small samples or track records. The article illustrates the methodology throughout by applying these results to a suite of systematic strategy indexes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信