矿山与山脉:矿坑美学、Marikana与当代南非小说

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN
C. Thurman
{"title":"矿山与山脉:矿坑美学、Marikana与当代南非小说","authors":"C. Thurman","doi":"10.2979/reseafrilite.53.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The mine dump, long a useful metonym for South African writers, has receded from view in \"Johannesburg fiction\" of recent years. By contrast, in the visual arts, there has been a burgeoning of renewed engagement with mines and mine dumps. Does this tell us something about representation, and the unrepresentable, in these different creative forms? Mine dumps, urban mountains, are related to histories of oppression, to ongoing economic inequality, and to environmental degradation, but they are still visually impressive. For about a decade, South African novelists have tended to avoid this paradox. One might extrapolate such a trend to suggest that, while in the visual arts there is some level of continuity—the continuation of a tradition—when it comes to fiction there has been a rupture, or at least a disruption. Is it that mine dumps are too familiar, that it has become impossible to avoid cliché in literary evocations of them? Or is the rupture to some degree coterminous with the Marikana massacre of 2012? Marikana has been the subject of essays, poems, long form journalism, and nonfiction books, as well as documentary films, music, and theater. But it has not substantially or explicitly found its way into literary fiction. Like the artificial mine-mountains of the reef, Marikana's natural \"mountain,\" Wonderkop, seems to remain out of the immediate purview of contemporary fiction. While Marikana might mark the end of one phase and the beginning of another in South African literary production, it is not (as yet) encompassed by or taken account of in the country's fiction.","PeriodicalId":21021,"journal":{"name":"Research in African Literatures","volume":"53 1","pages":"27 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mines and Mountains: Mine Dump Aesthetics, Marikana, and Contemporary South African Fiction\",\"authors\":\"C. Thurman\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/reseafrilite.53.1.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:The mine dump, long a useful metonym for South African writers, has receded from view in \\\"Johannesburg fiction\\\" of recent years. By contrast, in the visual arts, there has been a burgeoning of renewed engagement with mines and mine dumps. Does this tell us something about representation, and the unrepresentable, in these different creative forms? Mine dumps, urban mountains, are related to histories of oppression, to ongoing economic inequality, and to environmental degradation, but they are still visually impressive. For about a decade, South African novelists have tended to avoid this paradox. One might extrapolate such a trend to suggest that, while in the visual arts there is some level of continuity—the continuation of a tradition—when it comes to fiction there has been a rupture, or at least a disruption. Is it that mine dumps are too familiar, that it has become impossible to avoid cliché in literary evocations of them? Or is the rupture to some degree coterminous with the Marikana massacre of 2012? Marikana has been the subject of essays, poems, long form journalism, and nonfiction books, as well as documentary films, music, and theater. But it has not substantially or explicitly found its way into literary fiction. Like the artificial mine-mountains of the reef, Marikana's natural \\\"mountain,\\\" Wonderkop, seems to remain out of the immediate purview of contemporary fiction. While Marikana might mark the end of one phase and the beginning of another in South African literary production, it is not (as yet) encompassed by or taken account of in the country's fiction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in African Literatures\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"27 - 44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in African Literatures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/reseafrilite.53.1.03\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in African Literatures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/reseafrilite.53.1.03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:长期以来,对南非作家来说,“矿场”是一个有用的转喻,但近年来,“约翰内斯堡小说”中的“矿场”已经不复存在。相比之下,在视觉艺术中,与矿山和矿场的重新接触迅速兴起。这是否告诉了我们在这些不同的创造性形式中的代表性和不可代表性?矿山、城市山脉与压迫的历史、持续的经济不平等和环境退化有关,但它们在视觉上仍然令人印象深刻。大约十年来,南非小说家一直倾向于避免这种矛盾。有人可能会推断出这样一种趋势,认为虽然视觉艺术有一定程度的连续性——传统的延续——但当涉及到小说时,已经出现了断裂,或者至少是中断。是不是我的垃圾堆太熟悉了,文学上对它们的唤起已经无法避免陈词滥调?还是在某种程度上与2012年马里卡纳大屠杀有关?玛丽卡纳一直是散文、诗歌、长篇新闻、非小说类书籍以及纪录片、音乐和戏剧的主题。但它并没有实质性地或明确地进入文学小说。就像珊瑚礁上的人工矿山一样,马里卡纳的自然“山”Wonderkop似乎仍然不在当代小说的直接范围内。虽然《玛丽卡纳》可能标志着南非文学创作一个阶段的结束和另一阶段的开始,但它(迄今为止)还没有被该国的小说所涵盖或考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mines and Mountains: Mine Dump Aesthetics, Marikana, and Contemporary South African Fiction
ABSTRACT:The mine dump, long a useful metonym for South African writers, has receded from view in "Johannesburg fiction" of recent years. By contrast, in the visual arts, there has been a burgeoning of renewed engagement with mines and mine dumps. Does this tell us something about representation, and the unrepresentable, in these different creative forms? Mine dumps, urban mountains, are related to histories of oppression, to ongoing economic inequality, and to environmental degradation, but they are still visually impressive. For about a decade, South African novelists have tended to avoid this paradox. One might extrapolate such a trend to suggest that, while in the visual arts there is some level of continuity—the continuation of a tradition—when it comes to fiction there has been a rupture, or at least a disruption. Is it that mine dumps are too familiar, that it has become impossible to avoid cliché in literary evocations of them? Or is the rupture to some degree coterminous with the Marikana massacre of 2012? Marikana has been the subject of essays, poems, long form journalism, and nonfiction books, as well as documentary films, music, and theater. But it has not substantially or explicitly found its way into literary fiction. Like the artificial mine-mountains of the reef, Marikana's natural "mountain," Wonderkop, seems to remain out of the immediate purview of contemporary fiction. While Marikana might mark the end of one phase and the beginning of another in South African literary production, it is not (as yet) encompassed by or taken account of in the country's fiction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in African Literatures
Research in African Literatures LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1970, Research in African Literatures is the premier journal of African literary studies worldwide and provides a forum in English for research on the oral and written literatures of Africa, as well as information on African publishing, announcements of importance to Africanists, and notes and queries of literary interest. Reviews of current scholarly books are included in every issue, often presented as review essays, and a forum offers readers the opportunity to respond to issues raised in articles and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信