不同多普勒研究的小孕龄胎儿胎盘病理学

Q4 Medicine
Thanapob Bumphenkiatikul, Ananya Trongpisutsak, P. Tantbirojn, B. Uerpairojkit
{"title":"不同多普勒研究的小孕龄胎儿胎盘病理学","authors":"Thanapob Bumphenkiatikul, Ananya Trongpisutsak, P. Tantbirojn, B. Uerpairojkit","doi":"10.14456/TJOG.2017.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To describe and compare placental pathologies and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses with their umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler studies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in pregnant women delivered between gestational ages of 24 to 42 week at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Only singletons without infection, chromosomal abnormalities or major structural abnormalities were included. Those with no Doppler study within 7 days prior to delivery were excluded. Sixty-nine subjects enrolled were classified into Group 1 (n=16): normal UA and MCA pulsatility index (PI), Group 2 (n=28): normal UA but abnormal MCA PI and Group 3 (n=25): abnormal UA PI/absent or reversed end diastolic flow (AREDF). Data were compared between each group. Results: Fetuses in Group 3 were found to be delivered at earlier gestational age with lower birth weight, higher Cesarean delivery rate, higher proportion of fetuses with Apgar score less than 7, higher NICU admission, and higher neonatal resuscitation rate than those in Group 1 and Group 2. There was no significant difference in placental weight, gross umbilical cord abnormality, and overall placental underperfusion pathology. Placental infarct in Group 3 was found to be more prevalent than those in Group 1 and Group 2. Conclusion: Placental infarct was the only abnormal placental pathology that was significantly found in SGA fetuses with abnormal UA PI/AREDF. These SGA fetuses carried a higher morbidity and mortality than those with normal UA Doppler study regardless of normality of MCA Doppler.","PeriodicalId":36742,"journal":{"name":"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"25 1","pages":"18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Placental Pathology in Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses with Different Doppler Studies\",\"authors\":\"Thanapob Bumphenkiatikul, Ananya Trongpisutsak, P. Tantbirojn, B. Uerpairojkit\",\"doi\":\"10.14456/TJOG.2017.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To describe and compare placental pathologies and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses with their umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler studies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in pregnant women delivered between gestational ages of 24 to 42 week at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Only singletons without infection, chromosomal abnormalities or major structural abnormalities were included. Those with no Doppler study within 7 days prior to delivery were excluded. Sixty-nine subjects enrolled were classified into Group 1 (n=16): normal UA and MCA pulsatility index (PI), Group 2 (n=28): normal UA but abnormal MCA PI and Group 3 (n=25): abnormal UA PI/absent or reversed end diastolic flow (AREDF). Data were compared between each group. Results: Fetuses in Group 3 were found to be delivered at earlier gestational age with lower birth weight, higher Cesarean delivery rate, higher proportion of fetuses with Apgar score less than 7, higher NICU admission, and higher neonatal resuscitation rate than those in Group 1 and Group 2. There was no significant difference in placental weight, gross umbilical cord abnormality, and overall placental underperfusion pathology. Placental infarct in Group 3 was found to be more prevalent than those in Group 1 and Group 2. Conclusion: Placental infarct was the only abnormal placental pathology that was significantly found in SGA fetuses with abnormal UA PI/AREDF. These SGA fetuses carried a higher morbidity and mortality than those with normal UA Doppler study regardless of normality of MCA Doppler.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"18-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14456/TJOG.2017.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14456/TJOG.2017.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:通过脐动脉(UA)和大脑中动脉(MCA)多普勒研究,描述和比较小于胎龄(SGA)胎儿妊娠的胎盘病理和新生儿结局。材料和方法:对在朱拉隆功国王纪念医院分娩的孕龄在24至42周之间的孕妇进行回顾性研究。只包括没有感染、染色体异常或主要结构异常的单身者。分娩前7天内未进行多普勒检查的患者除外。69名入选受试者被分为第1组(n=16):UA和MCA搏动指数(PI)正常,第2组(n=28):UA正常但MCA PI异常,第3组(n=25):UA PI/舒张末血流不存在或逆转(AREDF)异常。比较各组之间的数据。结果:与第1组和第2组相比,第3组的胎儿在孕早期分娩,出生体重较低,剖宫产率较高,Apgar评分低于7的胎儿比例较高,新生儿重症监护室的入院率较高,新生儿复苏率较高。在胎盘重量、脐带总异常和整体胎盘灌注不足病理学方面没有显著差异。发现第3组的胎盘梗死比第1组和第2组的更普遍。结论:胎盘梗死是唯一在UA PI/AREDF异常的SGA胎儿中明显发现的异常胎盘病理。无论MCA多普勒是否正常,这些SGA胎儿的发病率和死亡率都高于UA多普勒研究正常的胎儿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Placental Pathology in Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses with Different Doppler Studies
Objectives: To describe and compare placental pathologies and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses with their umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler studies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in pregnant women delivered between gestational ages of 24 to 42 week at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Only singletons without infection, chromosomal abnormalities or major structural abnormalities were included. Those with no Doppler study within 7 days prior to delivery were excluded. Sixty-nine subjects enrolled were classified into Group 1 (n=16): normal UA and MCA pulsatility index (PI), Group 2 (n=28): normal UA but abnormal MCA PI and Group 3 (n=25): abnormal UA PI/absent or reversed end diastolic flow (AREDF). Data were compared between each group. Results: Fetuses in Group 3 were found to be delivered at earlier gestational age with lower birth weight, higher Cesarean delivery rate, higher proportion of fetuses with Apgar score less than 7, higher NICU admission, and higher neonatal resuscitation rate than those in Group 1 and Group 2. There was no significant difference in placental weight, gross umbilical cord abnormality, and overall placental underperfusion pathology. Placental infarct in Group 3 was found to be more prevalent than those in Group 1 and Group 2. Conclusion: Placental infarct was the only abnormal placental pathology that was significantly found in SGA fetuses with abnormal UA PI/AREDF. These SGA fetuses carried a higher morbidity and mortality than those with normal UA Doppler study regardless of normality of MCA Doppler.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信