宗教退出和社会网络:宗教/世俗多元主义的计算机模拟

IF 1.7 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Ryan T. Cragun, Kevin McCaffree, Ivan Puga‐Gonzalez, W. Wildman, F. Shults
{"title":"宗教退出和社会网络:宗教/世俗多元主义的计算机模拟","authors":"Ryan T. Cragun, Kevin McCaffree, Ivan Puga‐Gonzalez, W. Wildman, F. Shults","doi":"10.5334/SNR.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statistical models attempting to predict who will disaffiliate from religions have typically accounted for less than 15% of the variation in religious affiliations, suggesting that we have only a partial understanding of this vital social process. Using agent-based simulations in three “artificial societies” (one predominantly religious; one predominantly secular; and one in between), we demonstrate that worldview pluralism within one’s neighborhood and family social networks can be a significant predictor of religious (dis)affiliation but in pluralistic societies worldview diversity is less important and, instead, people move toward worldview neutrality. Our results suggest that there may be two phases in religious disaffiliation: (1) the early adopters initially disaffiliate regardless of social support, and subsequently (2) disaffiliation spreads as support for it within local social networks widens and it appears more acceptable. An important next step is for sociologists to confirm or correct the theoretical findings of this model using real-world social-network data, which will require overcoming the measurement difficulties involved in estimating each individual’s degree of local network pluralism.","PeriodicalId":42349,"journal":{"name":"Secularism & Nonreligion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religious Exiting and Social Networks: Computer Simulations of Religious/Secular Pluralism\",\"authors\":\"Ryan T. Cragun, Kevin McCaffree, Ivan Puga‐Gonzalez, W. Wildman, F. Shults\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/SNR.129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Statistical models attempting to predict who will disaffiliate from religions have typically accounted for less than 15% of the variation in religious affiliations, suggesting that we have only a partial understanding of this vital social process. Using agent-based simulations in three “artificial societies” (one predominantly religious; one predominantly secular; and one in between), we demonstrate that worldview pluralism within one’s neighborhood and family social networks can be a significant predictor of religious (dis)affiliation but in pluralistic societies worldview diversity is less important and, instead, people move toward worldview neutrality. Our results suggest that there may be two phases in religious disaffiliation: (1) the early adopters initially disaffiliate regardless of social support, and subsequently (2) disaffiliation spreads as support for it within local social networks widens and it appears more acceptable. An important next step is for sociologists to confirm or correct the theoretical findings of this model using real-world social-network data, which will require overcoming the measurement difficulties involved in estimating each individual’s degree of local network pluralism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Secularism & Nonreligion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Secularism & Nonreligion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/SNR.129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Secularism & Nonreligion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/SNR.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

试图预测谁会脱离宗教的统计模型通常只占宗教信仰变化的不到15%,这表明我们对这一重要的社会过程只有部分理解。在三个“人工社会”(一个以宗教为主;世俗的:主要是世俗的;(介于两者之间),我们证明了一个人的社区和家庭社会网络中的世界观多元化可以成为宗教(非)从属关系的重要预测因素,但在多元化社会中,世界观多样性不那么重要,相反,人们倾向于世界观中立。我们的研究结果表明,宗教脱离可能有两个阶段:(1)早期信奉者最初不顾社会支持而脱离宗教;(2)随着当地社会网络中对宗教的支持扩大,宗教脱离会扩散,并变得更容易被接受。对于社会学家来说,重要的下一步是使用现实世界的社会网络数据来确认或纠正这个模型的理论发现,这将需要克服在估计每个人的本地网络多元化程度时所涉及的测量困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Religious Exiting and Social Networks: Computer Simulations of Religious/Secular Pluralism
Statistical models attempting to predict who will disaffiliate from religions have typically accounted for less than 15% of the variation in religious affiliations, suggesting that we have only a partial understanding of this vital social process. Using agent-based simulations in three “artificial societies” (one predominantly religious; one predominantly secular; and one in between), we demonstrate that worldview pluralism within one’s neighborhood and family social networks can be a significant predictor of religious (dis)affiliation but in pluralistic societies worldview diversity is less important and, instead, people move toward worldview neutrality. Our results suggest that there may be two phases in religious disaffiliation: (1) the early adopters initially disaffiliate regardless of social support, and subsequently (2) disaffiliation spreads as support for it within local social networks widens and it appears more acceptable. An important next step is for sociologists to confirm or correct the theoretical findings of this model using real-world social-network data, which will require overcoming the measurement difficulties involved in estimating each individual’s degree of local network pluralism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
3
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信