Mariam Ghabour BPharm, MQM, Kyle John Wilby PharmD, PhD, Caroline J. Morris BPharm (Hons), MSc, PhD, Alesha J. Smith BSc, MSc, MBA, PhD
{"title":"影响非医疗处方成功实施的因素概述","authors":"Mariam Ghabour BPharm, MQM, Kyle John Wilby PharmD, PhD, Caroline J. Morris BPharm (Hons), MSc, PhD, Alesha J. Smith BSc, MSc, MBA, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study sought to determine the factors influencing successful implementation of non-medical prescribing (NMP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data sources</h3>\n \n <p>EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL and reference lists were searched from January 2010 to November 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Selection</h3>\n \n <p>Umbrella review and narrative synthesis of results were utilised. The retrieved reviews underwent title screening, abstract review, full-text screening and assessment for inclusion. To guarantee the precision of the search results, Participants, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes (PICO) elements were recorded for each study. Studies were included if they were systematic reviews, published in English, published from January 2010 to November 2020, and discussed barriers and/or facilitators to NMP implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 193 studies identified, eight were eligible for inclusion. Most of the reviews (62%) were published in 2017–2018. The majority of the reviews (62%) were focused on the United Kingdom. Three reviews discussed nurse prescribing, two reviews focused on pharmacist prescribing, and three reviews investigated NMP generally. Data were compiled into the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to evaluate the factors that influence the success or failure of NMP implementation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Implementation of NMP is a complex process which requires fulfilment of all its elements. The success of NMP can be directly related to the extent of the whole system engagement and support, and available funding.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"53 4","pages":"155-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1868","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overview of factors influencing successful implementation of non-medical prescribing\",\"authors\":\"Mariam Ghabour BPharm, MQM, Kyle John Wilby PharmD, PhD, Caroline J. Morris BPharm (Hons), MSc, PhD, Alesha J. Smith BSc, MSc, MBA, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jppr.1868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study sought to determine the factors influencing successful implementation of non-medical prescribing (NMP).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data sources</h3>\\n \\n <p>EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL and reference lists were searched from January 2010 to November 2020.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study Selection</h3>\\n \\n <p>Umbrella review and narrative synthesis of results were utilised. The retrieved reviews underwent title screening, abstract review, full-text screening and assessment for inclusion. To guarantee the precision of the search results, Participants, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes (PICO) elements were recorded for each study. Studies were included if they were systematic reviews, published in English, published from January 2010 to November 2020, and discussed barriers and/or facilitators to NMP implementation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 193 studies identified, eight were eligible for inclusion. Most of the reviews (62%) were published in 2017–2018. The majority of the reviews (62%) were focused on the United Kingdom. Three reviews discussed nurse prescribing, two reviews focused on pharmacist prescribing, and three reviews investigated NMP generally. Data were compiled into the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to evaluate the factors that influence the success or failure of NMP implementation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Implementation of NMP is a complex process which requires fulfilment of all its elements. The success of NMP can be directly related to the extent of the whole system engagement and support, and available funding.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"53 4\",\"pages\":\"155-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1868\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Overview of factors influencing successful implementation of non-medical prescribing
Aim
This study sought to determine the factors influencing successful implementation of non-medical prescribing (NMP).
Data sources
EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL and reference lists were searched from January 2010 to November 2020.
Study Selection
Umbrella review and narrative synthesis of results were utilised. The retrieved reviews underwent title screening, abstract review, full-text screening and assessment for inclusion. To guarantee the precision of the search results, Participants, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes (PICO) elements were recorded for each study. Studies were included if they were systematic reviews, published in English, published from January 2010 to November 2020, and discussed barriers and/or facilitators to NMP implementation.
Results
Of the 193 studies identified, eight were eligible for inclusion. Most of the reviews (62%) were published in 2017–2018. The majority of the reviews (62%) were focused on the United Kingdom. Three reviews discussed nurse prescribing, two reviews focused on pharmacist prescribing, and three reviews investigated NMP generally. Data were compiled into the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to evaluate the factors that influence the success or failure of NMP implementation.
Conclusion
Implementation of NMP is a complex process which requires fulfilment of all its elements. The success of NMP can be directly related to the extent of the whole system engagement and support, and available funding.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.