人际信任与制度信任对企业知识共享的影响研究:知识共享的无形之手

IF 2.7 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Farzad Sabetzadeh, Yanzi Chen
{"title":"人际信任与制度信任对企业知识共享的影响研究:知识共享的无形之手","authors":"Farzad Sabetzadeh, Yanzi Chen","doi":"10.1108/vjikms-06-2022-0206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine the impact of different subtypes of trust on the willingness of companies to share knowledge. To measure improvement in work performance, three perspectives of interpersonal trust, institution-based trust and their combined effect on fostering trust are examined.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA comparative analysis and quantitative measurement are used in this study (with a sample size of 147) to determine which knowledge-sharing channels need to be established to increase effectiveness and efficiency.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study found that both interpersonal and institutional trust can positively influence employees' willingness to share personal knowledge. Despite this, the combination of these two types of trust cannot outperform the scenarios in which one type of trust can reach its maximum. As a result of institutional trust, trustees are more likely to trust others when they feel protected.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nTrust may take on multiple dimensions in different business contexts and industries. In this study, the limited sample size and domain may only reveal some of these aspects of trust, which may not be representative of other contexts.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFew researchers have examined the degree of trust and its impact on knowledge dissemination using relevant parameters. Their focus is solely on the interaction between interpersonal trust and knowledge sharing. As a result of this study, the concept of “trust” was quantified, with more tangible metrics to provide better estimates when assessed in different business contexts.\n","PeriodicalId":45590,"journal":{"name":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation of the impact of interpersonal and institutional trust on knowledge sharing in companies: invisible hands for knowledge sharing\",\"authors\":\"Farzad Sabetzadeh, Yanzi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/vjikms-06-2022-0206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to examine the impact of different subtypes of trust on the willingness of companies to share knowledge. To measure improvement in work performance, three perspectives of interpersonal trust, institution-based trust and their combined effect on fostering trust are examined.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA comparative analysis and quantitative measurement are used in this study (with a sample size of 147) to determine which knowledge-sharing channels need to be established to increase effectiveness and efficiency.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study found that both interpersonal and institutional trust can positively influence employees' willingness to share personal knowledge. Despite this, the combination of these two types of trust cannot outperform the scenarios in which one type of trust can reach its maximum. As a result of institutional trust, trustees are more likely to trust others when they feel protected.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nTrust may take on multiple dimensions in different business contexts and industries. In this study, the limited sample size and domain may only reveal some of these aspects of trust, which may not be representative of other contexts.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nFew researchers have examined the degree of trust and its impact on knowledge dissemination using relevant parameters. Their focus is solely on the interaction between interpersonal trust and knowledge sharing. As a result of this study, the concept of “trust” was quantified, with more tangible metrics to provide better estimates when assessed in different business contexts.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-06-2022-0206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-06-2022-0206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的研究不同类型的信任对企业知识共享意愿的影响。为了衡量工作绩效的改善,本研究考察了人际信任、制度信任三个视角及其对促进信任的综合效应。设计/方法/方法本研究(147个样本)采用比较分析和定量测量来确定需要建立哪些知识共享渠道以提高有效性和效率。本研究发现人际信任和制度信任对员工分享个人知识的意愿均有正向影响。尽管如此,这两种类型的信任的组合并不能超越其中一种信任可以达到其最大值的场景。作为制度信任的结果,受托人在感到受到保护时更有可能信任他人。研究局限/启示在不同的商业环境和行业中,信任可能表现为多个维度。在本研究中,有限的样本量和领域可能只揭示了信任的一些方面,这可能不代表其他情况。原创性/价值很少有研究者使用相关参数考察信任程度及其对知识传播的影响。他们只关注人际信任与知识共享之间的相互作用。作为这项研究的结果,“信任”的概念被量化了,当在不同的业务环境中进行评估时,使用更有形的度量来提供更好的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An investigation of the impact of interpersonal and institutional trust on knowledge sharing in companies: invisible hands for knowledge sharing
Purpose This study aims to examine the impact of different subtypes of trust on the willingness of companies to share knowledge. To measure improvement in work performance, three perspectives of interpersonal trust, institution-based trust and their combined effect on fostering trust are examined. Design/methodology/approach A comparative analysis and quantitative measurement are used in this study (with a sample size of 147) to determine which knowledge-sharing channels need to be established to increase effectiveness and efficiency. Findings This study found that both interpersonal and institutional trust can positively influence employees' willingness to share personal knowledge. Despite this, the combination of these two types of trust cannot outperform the scenarios in which one type of trust can reach its maximum. As a result of institutional trust, trustees are more likely to trust others when they feel protected. Research limitations/implications Trust may take on multiple dimensions in different business contexts and industries. In this study, the limited sample size and domain may only reveal some of these aspects of trust, which may not be representative of other contexts. Originality/value Few researchers have examined the degree of trust and its impact on knowledge dissemination using relevant parameters. Their focus is solely on the interaction between interpersonal trust and knowledge sharing. As a result of this study, the concept of “trust” was quantified, with more tangible metrics to provide better estimates when assessed in different business contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信