有效工作场所文化的指路明灯,也是良好的工作场所

Shaun Cardiff, K. Sanders, J. Webster, K. Manley
{"title":"有效工作场所文化的指路明灯,也是良好的工作场所","authors":"Shaun Cardiff, K. Sanders, J. Webster, K. Manley","doi":"10.19043/ipdj.102.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Working environments and relationships influence healthcare workers’ satisfaction and intent to stay, as well as service-user outcomes. With staff shortages a global issue, co-creation of effective workplace cultures that are also good places to work is more important than ever. Since our original research in 2011, a growing body of theoretical insights into workplace cultures has shown how complex it can be to develop them. We were curious about what staff felt works or what is needed. Aim: To develop a guiding theory with and for healthcare practitioners on effective workplace cultures in settings that are also good places to work. Methods: A three-phase study was used, based on principles of appreciative inquiry and realist evaluation. A blog generated initial interest, followed by a Twitter chat posing provocative questions. A series of Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) configurations emerged and were presented to a new audience during an international conference. Endorsements and additions enabled further refinement of the initial programme theories, which were again presented for reflections during a second Twitter chat. Subsequent analysis resulted in a realist programme theory ready for further testing in practice. Findings/results: There are four guiding lights for co-creating effective workplace cultures in settings that are also good places to work: collective leadership; living shared values; safe, critical, creative learning environments; and change for good that makes a difference. When each is given adequate attention and all are combined, the ultimate outcomes include: high-performing teams that flourish and provide person- and relationship-centred care that is safe, effective and independent of the agency of specific individuals; and teams that develop effective partnerships within and across boundaries. Conclusions: Based on the voices of international frontline healthcare staff, we propose the retention of staff committed to providing care valued by staff and service users can be achieved by: collective leadership; living shared values; safe, critical, creative learning environments; and change for good as determined by those providing and experiencing care. Implications for practice: Healthcare managers, leaders and commissioners need to recognise and support microsystem culture development that staff and service users experience as good and safe Workplace culture development should be continuous, collaborative, inclusive and participatory, and driven by staff and service-user experiences, not top-down action planning and box ticking Responsive and person-centred leadership enables effective workplace cultures and collective leadership","PeriodicalId":30387,"journal":{"name":"International Practice Development Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guiding lights for effective workplace cultures that are also good places to work\",\"authors\":\"Shaun Cardiff, K. Sanders, J. Webster, K. Manley\",\"doi\":\"10.19043/ipdj.102.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Working environments and relationships influence healthcare workers’ satisfaction and intent to stay, as well as service-user outcomes. With staff shortages a global issue, co-creation of effective workplace cultures that are also good places to work is more important than ever. Since our original research in 2011, a growing body of theoretical insights into workplace cultures has shown how complex it can be to develop them. We were curious about what staff felt works or what is needed. Aim: To develop a guiding theory with and for healthcare practitioners on effective workplace cultures in settings that are also good places to work. Methods: A three-phase study was used, based on principles of appreciative inquiry and realist evaluation. A blog generated initial interest, followed by a Twitter chat posing provocative questions. A series of Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) configurations emerged and were presented to a new audience during an international conference. Endorsements and additions enabled further refinement of the initial programme theories, which were again presented for reflections during a second Twitter chat. Subsequent analysis resulted in a realist programme theory ready for further testing in practice. Findings/results: There are four guiding lights for co-creating effective workplace cultures in settings that are also good places to work: collective leadership; living shared values; safe, critical, creative learning environments; and change for good that makes a difference. When each is given adequate attention and all are combined, the ultimate outcomes include: high-performing teams that flourish and provide person- and relationship-centred care that is safe, effective and independent of the agency of specific individuals; and teams that develop effective partnerships within and across boundaries. Conclusions: Based on the voices of international frontline healthcare staff, we propose the retention of staff committed to providing care valued by staff and service users can be achieved by: collective leadership; living shared values; safe, critical, creative learning environments; and change for good as determined by those providing and experiencing care. Implications for practice: Healthcare managers, leaders and commissioners need to recognise and support microsystem culture development that staff and service users experience as good and safe Workplace culture development should be continuous, collaborative, inclusive and participatory, and driven by staff and service-user experiences, not top-down action planning and box ticking Responsive and person-centred leadership enables effective workplace cultures and collective leadership\",\"PeriodicalId\":30387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Practice Development Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Practice Development Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.102.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Practice Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.102.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

背景:工作环境和关系会影响医护人员的满意度和留下来的意愿,以及服务用户的结果。由于员工短缺是一个全球性问题,共同创造有效的工作场所文化,同时也是良好的工作场所,比以往任何时候都更加重要。自2011年我们进行最初的研究以来,越来越多的对职场文化的理论见解表明,发展职场文化是多么复杂。我们很好奇员工们觉得什么有效或者需要什么。目的:与医疗从业者一起,为他们制定一个关于在良好工作环境中有效工作场所文化的指导理论。方法:采用欣赏性探究和现实主义评价相结合的三阶段研究方法。一个博客引起了最初的兴趣,随后在推特上聊天提出了一些挑衅性的问题。在一次国际会议上,出现了一系列情境机制结果(CMO)配置,并向新的受众介绍。背书和补充使最初的节目理论得以进一步完善,在第二次推特聊天中再次提出供思考。随后的分析得出了一个现实主义的方案理论,可供在实践中进一步检验。调查结果/结果:在同样是良好工作场所的环境中,共同创造有效的工作场所文化有四个指路明灯:集体领导;实现共同价值观;安全、批判性、创造性的学习环境;而改变会带来改变。当每一个都得到足够的关注,并且所有这些都结合在一起时,最终的结果包括:高绩效团队蓬勃发展,提供以个人和关系为中心的安全、有效和独立于特定个人代理的护理;以及在边界内外建立有效伙伴关系的团队。结论:基于国际一线医护人员的声音,我们建议通过以下方式留住致力于提供员工和服务用户重视的护理的员工:集体领导;实现共同价值观;安全、批判性、创造性的学习环境;以及由那些提供和体验护理的人决定的永远的改变。实践意义:医疗保健管理人员、领导者和专员需要认识到并支持员工和服务用户体验到的良好和安全的微系统文化发展。工作场所文化发展应该是持续的、协作的、包容性的和参与性的,并由员工和服务使用者的体验驱动,不是自上而下的行动计划和勾选框响应性和以人为本的领导能够实现有效的工作场所文化和集体领导
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guiding lights for effective workplace cultures that are also good places to work
Background: Working environments and relationships influence healthcare workers’ satisfaction and intent to stay, as well as service-user outcomes. With staff shortages a global issue, co-creation of effective workplace cultures that are also good places to work is more important than ever. Since our original research in 2011, a growing body of theoretical insights into workplace cultures has shown how complex it can be to develop them. We were curious about what staff felt works or what is needed. Aim: To develop a guiding theory with and for healthcare practitioners on effective workplace cultures in settings that are also good places to work. Methods: A three-phase study was used, based on principles of appreciative inquiry and realist evaluation. A blog generated initial interest, followed by a Twitter chat posing provocative questions. A series of Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) configurations emerged and were presented to a new audience during an international conference. Endorsements and additions enabled further refinement of the initial programme theories, which were again presented for reflections during a second Twitter chat. Subsequent analysis resulted in a realist programme theory ready for further testing in practice. Findings/results: There are four guiding lights for co-creating effective workplace cultures in settings that are also good places to work: collective leadership; living shared values; safe, critical, creative learning environments; and change for good that makes a difference. When each is given adequate attention and all are combined, the ultimate outcomes include: high-performing teams that flourish and provide person- and relationship-centred care that is safe, effective and independent of the agency of specific individuals; and teams that develop effective partnerships within and across boundaries. Conclusions: Based on the voices of international frontline healthcare staff, we propose the retention of staff committed to providing care valued by staff and service users can be achieved by: collective leadership; living shared values; safe, critical, creative learning environments; and change for good as determined by those providing and experiencing care. Implications for practice: Healthcare managers, leaders and commissioners need to recognise and support microsystem culture development that staff and service users experience as good and safe Workplace culture development should be continuous, collaborative, inclusive and participatory, and driven by staff and service-user experiences, not top-down action planning and box ticking Responsive and person-centred leadership enables effective workplace cultures and collective leadership
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信