评估健康反应的不一致性:来自印度老年人的证据

Q3 Nursing
D. Ghosh
{"title":"评估健康反应的不一致性:来自印度老年人的证据","authors":"D. Ghosh","doi":"10.1108/wwop-05-2021-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper explored the reliability of self-reported health and the impact of the social position in determining the inconsistent health response (IHR), in late life. Reliability of self-reported health is important to evaluate, as it is the primary step for asking health-care facility. As self-reported health is a subjective measure, elderly people might have a tendency of under-reporting the health problem because of lower socioeconomic status. This incidence can cause inaccurate estimate of the health problem of the aged at the time of formulating health policy or providing health-care infrastructure. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the sources of inconsistent responses of self-reported health by comparing it with the existence of chronicle ailment and to identify the vulnerable group that health care supports.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study uses nationally representative unit-level data from the National Sample Survey of India. Using the bi-variate probit model, joint estimation of reported health and IHRs is determined. The study compares perceived and actual health status and explores how individual characteristics and socioeconomic position contributes to IHRs among the elderly population.\n\n\nFindings\nMajor findings of this study are as follows: firstly, self-reported health has little reliability, as it is compared with the existence of chronicle ailment. Older people in the rural areas have greater tendency to under-estimate the health problem, whereas urban elders tend to over-estimate it; and secondly, the inconsistency in health response is significantly associated with social caste, economic status and attainment of education.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe results of this study from bivariate probit model offer deeper understandings about the reliability of self-reported health and provide further insights to improve policy design formulated to mitigate the health inequality among the elders. This study might be helpful to design an inexpensive and easily available health measure, which is very important for a highly populated aging country with limited health-care resources.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of author’s knowledge, it is the first study that has identified the sources of inconsistent health and direction of inconsistency that is where self-reported health over- or under-estimates the actual health response among the elderly in a developing country like India, where the growth rate of population aging is faster than the world.\n","PeriodicalId":53659,"journal":{"name":"Working with Older People","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating inconsistency in health responses: evidence from elderly in India\",\"authors\":\"D. Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/wwop-05-2021-0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper explored the reliability of self-reported health and the impact of the social position in determining the inconsistent health response (IHR), in late life. Reliability of self-reported health is important to evaluate, as it is the primary step for asking health-care facility. As self-reported health is a subjective measure, elderly people might have a tendency of under-reporting the health problem because of lower socioeconomic status. This incidence can cause inaccurate estimate of the health problem of the aged at the time of formulating health policy or providing health-care infrastructure. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the sources of inconsistent responses of self-reported health by comparing it with the existence of chronicle ailment and to identify the vulnerable group that health care supports.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe study uses nationally representative unit-level data from the National Sample Survey of India. Using the bi-variate probit model, joint estimation of reported health and IHRs is determined. The study compares perceived and actual health status and explores how individual characteristics and socioeconomic position contributes to IHRs among the elderly population.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nMajor findings of this study are as follows: firstly, self-reported health has little reliability, as it is compared with the existence of chronicle ailment. Older people in the rural areas have greater tendency to under-estimate the health problem, whereas urban elders tend to over-estimate it; and secondly, the inconsistency in health response is significantly associated with social caste, economic status and attainment of education.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThe results of this study from bivariate probit model offer deeper understandings about the reliability of self-reported health and provide further insights to improve policy design formulated to mitigate the health inequality among the elders. This study might be helpful to design an inexpensive and easily available health measure, which is very important for a highly populated aging country with limited health-care resources.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of author’s knowledge, it is the first study that has identified the sources of inconsistent health and direction of inconsistency that is where self-reported health over- or under-estimates the actual health response among the elderly in a developing country like India, where the growth rate of population aging is faster than the world.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":53659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Working with Older People\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Working with Older People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/wwop-05-2021-0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Working with Older People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/wwop-05-2021-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨晚年自我报告健康状况的可靠性以及社会地位在确定不一致健康反应(IHR)中的影响。自我报告健康状况的可靠性很重要,因为这是询问医疗机构的首要步骤。由于自我报告的健康状况是一种主观衡量标准,老年人可能会因为社会经济地位较低而有少报健康问题的倾向。这种发病率可能导致在制定卫生政策或提供卫生保健基础设施时对老年人健康问题的估计不准确。因此,本研究的目的是通过将自我报告的健康状况与编年史疾病的存在进行比较,探索其不一致反应的来源,并确定医疗保健支持的弱势群体。设计/方法/方法该研究使用了来自印度国家抽样调查的具有全国代表性的单位级数据。使用双变量probit模型,确定报告的健康状况和IHR的联合估计。该研究比较了感知和实际的健康状况,并探讨了个人特征和社会经济地位如何对老年人的IHR做出贡献。发现本研究的主要发现如下:首先,与编年史疾病的存在相比,自我报告的健康状况几乎没有可靠性。农村地区的老年人更倾向于低估健康问题,而城市老年人则倾向于高估健康问题;其次,健康反应的不一致性与社会种姓、经济地位和受教育程度显著相关。社会含义这项来自双变量probit模型的研究结果对自我报告健康的可靠性有了更深入的理解,并为改善为缓解老年人健康不平等而制定的政策设计提供了进一步的见解。这项研究可能有助于设计一种廉价且易于获得的健康措施,这对于一个人口稠密、医疗资源有限的老龄化国家来说非常重要。独创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一项确定了不一致健康的来源和不一致的方向的研究,即在印度这样的发展中国家,自我报告的健康状况高估或低估了老年人的实际健康反应,那里的人口老龄化增长速度快于世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating inconsistency in health responses: evidence from elderly in India
Purpose This paper explored the reliability of self-reported health and the impact of the social position in determining the inconsistent health response (IHR), in late life. Reliability of self-reported health is important to evaluate, as it is the primary step for asking health-care facility. As self-reported health is a subjective measure, elderly people might have a tendency of under-reporting the health problem because of lower socioeconomic status. This incidence can cause inaccurate estimate of the health problem of the aged at the time of formulating health policy or providing health-care infrastructure. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the sources of inconsistent responses of self-reported health by comparing it with the existence of chronicle ailment and to identify the vulnerable group that health care supports. Design/methodology/approach The study uses nationally representative unit-level data from the National Sample Survey of India. Using the bi-variate probit model, joint estimation of reported health and IHRs is determined. The study compares perceived and actual health status and explores how individual characteristics and socioeconomic position contributes to IHRs among the elderly population. Findings Major findings of this study are as follows: firstly, self-reported health has little reliability, as it is compared with the existence of chronicle ailment. Older people in the rural areas have greater tendency to under-estimate the health problem, whereas urban elders tend to over-estimate it; and secondly, the inconsistency in health response is significantly associated with social caste, economic status and attainment of education. Social implications The results of this study from bivariate probit model offer deeper understandings about the reliability of self-reported health and provide further insights to improve policy design formulated to mitigate the health inequality among the elders. This study might be helpful to design an inexpensive and easily available health measure, which is very important for a highly populated aging country with limited health-care resources. Originality/value To the best of author’s knowledge, it is the first study that has identified the sources of inconsistent health and direction of inconsistency that is where self-reported health over- or under-estimates the actual health response among the elderly in a developing country like India, where the growth rate of population aging is faster than the world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Working with Older People
Working with Older People Nursing-Community and Home Care
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信