{"title":"非线性场地响应的尺度边界有限元法与有限元法耦合分析","authors":"Ali Barghi Kherzeloo","doi":"10.13168/agg.2020.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presented 2D numerical linear and nonlinear site response analyses based on the scaled boundary finite-element method (SBFEM) and compared their results with those of the DEEPSOIL software. In linear time-domain analysis, the seismic boundary traction was applied to lines in the near-field with the same vertical coordinates using seismic time history load. The far-field was modeled utilizing an improved continued-fraction-based high-order transmitting boundary. The constitutive relationship of the boundary was determined utilizing the SBFEM equation in the dynamic stiffness model. It was shown that the results of the SBFEM had a good agreement with those obtained from the DEEPSOIL software. The results of spectral acceleration demonstrated period lengthening. The nonlinear site responses were analyzed using both the DEEPSOIL software and the coupling of SBFEM/FEM. The one-dimensional nonlinear site response was analyzed using the tools in the DEEPSOIL software including the strength correction, pressure-dependent modulus reduction, and the damping ratio curve of sand. In the nonlinear-coupled analysis, the bounded domain was also modeled in OpenSees using a pressuredependent multi-yield plasticity soil model. The comparison of the results demonstrated the accuracy of the nonlinear analysis using the coupled SBFEM/FEM. The coupling method underestimated spectral acceleration in low periods compared with the DEEPSOIL software. The absolute residual was also obtained less than 0.2. ARTICLE INFO Article history: Received 25 May 2020 Accepted 31 August 2020 Available online 19 September 2020","PeriodicalId":50899,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonlinear site response analysis by coupling scaled boundary finite element method and finite element method\",\"authors\":\"Ali Barghi Kherzeloo\",\"doi\":\"10.13168/agg.2020.0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presented 2D numerical linear and nonlinear site response analyses based on the scaled boundary finite-element method (SBFEM) and compared their results with those of the DEEPSOIL software. In linear time-domain analysis, the seismic boundary traction was applied to lines in the near-field with the same vertical coordinates using seismic time history load. The far-field was modeled utilizing an improved continued-fraction-based high-order transmitting boundary. The constitutive relationship of the boundary was determined utilizing the SBFEM equation in the dynamic stiffness model. It was shown that the results of the SBFEM had a good agreement with those obtained from the DEEPSOIL software. The results of spectral acceleration demonstrated period lengthening. The nonlinear site responses were analyzed using both the DEEPSOIL software and the coupling of SBFEM/FEM. The one-dimensional nonlinear site response was analyzed using the tools in the DEEPSOIL software including the strength correction, pressure-dependent modulus reduction, and the damping ratio curve of sand. In the nonlinear-coupled analysis, the bounded domain was also modeled in OpenSees using a pressuredependent multi-yield plasticity soil model. The comparison of the results demonstrated the accuracy of the nonlinear analysis using the coupled SBFEM/FEM. The coupling method underestimated spectral acceleration in low periods compared with the DEEPSOIL software. The absolute residual was also obtained less than 0.2. ARTICLE INFO Article history: Received 25 May 2020 Accepted 31 August 2020 Available online 19 September 2020\",\"PeriodicalId\":50899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13168/agg.2020.0029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13168/agg.2020.0029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nonlinear site response analysis by coupling scaled boundary finite element method and finite element method
This paper presented 2D numerical linear and nonlinear site response analyses based on the scaled boundary finite-element method (SBFEM) and compared their results with those of the DEEPSOIL software. In linear time-domain analysis, the seismic boundary traction was applied to lines in the near-field with the same vertical coordinates using seismic time history load. The far-field was modeled utilizing an improved continued-fraction-based high-order transmitting boundary. The constitutive relationship of the boundary was determined utilizing the SBFEM equation in the dynamic stiffness model. It was shown that the results of the SBFEM had a good agreement with those obtained from the DEEPSOIL software. The results of spectral acceleration demonstrated period lengthening. The nonlinear site responses were analyzed using both the DEEPSOIL software and the coupling of SBFEM/FEM. The one-dimensional nonlinear site response was analyzed using the tools in the DEEPSOIL software including the strength correction, pressure-dependent modulus reduction, and the damping ratio curve of sand. In the nonlinear-coupled analysis, the bounded domain was also modeled in OpenSees using a pressuredependent multi-yield plasticity soil model. The comparison of the results demonstrated the accuracy of the nonlinear analysis using the coupled SBFEM/FEM. The coupling method underestimated spectral acceleration in low periods compared with the DEEPSOIL software. The absolute residual was also obtained less than 0.2. ARTICLE INFO Article history: Received 25 May 2020 Accepted 31 August 2020 Available online 19 September 2020
期刊介绍:
Acta geodynamica et geomaterialia (AGG) has been published by the Institute of Rock Structures and Mechanics, Czech Academy of Sciences since 2004, formerly known as Acta Montana published from the beginning of sixties till 2003. Approximately 40 articles per year in four issues are published, covering observations related to central Europe and new theoretical developments and interpretations in these disciplines. It is possible to publish occasionally research articles from other regions of the world, only if they present substantial advance in methodological or theoretical development with worldwide impact. The Board of Editors is international in representation.