基于单个预测模型相关系数的组合预测方法的改进加权系统

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Chantha Wongoutong
{"title":"基于单个预测模型相关系数的组合预测方法的改进加权系统","authors":"Chantha Wongoutong","doi":"10.18187/pjsor.v19i3.4247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Herein, a modified weighting for combined forecasting methods is established. These weights are used to adjust the correlation coefficient between the actual and predicted values from five individual forecasting models based on their correlation coefficient values and ranking. Time-series datasets with three patterns (stationary, trend, or both trend and seasonal) were analyzed by using the five individual forecasting models and three combined forecasting methods: simple-average, Bates-Granger, and the proposed approach. The MAPE and RMSE results indicate that the proposed method outperformed the others, especially when the time-series pattern was stationary and improved the forecasting accuracy of the worst and best individual forecasting models by 35–37% and 7–10%, respectively. Moreover, the proposed method showed improvements in MAPE and RMSE of around 18–20% and 9–11% compared to the simple-average and Bates-Granger methods, respectively. In addition, the combined forecasting methods outperformed the individual forecasting models when analyzing non-stationary data. Remarkably, the performances of the proposed and Bates-Granger methods were almost the same, with improvements in MAPE and RMSE in the range of 1–2% on average. Therefore, the proposed method for creating weights based on the correlation coefficients of the individual forecasting models greatly improves combined forecasting methods.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A modified weighting system for combined forecasting methods based on the correlation coefficients of the individual forecasting models\",\"authors\":\"Chantha Wongoutong\",\"doi\":\"10.18187/pjsor.v19i3.4247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Herein, a modified weighting for combined forecasting methods is established. These weights are used to adjust the correlation coefficient between the actual and predicted values from five individual forecasting models based on their correlation coefficient values and ranking. Time-series datasets with three patterns (stationary, trend, or both trend and seasonal) were analyzed by using the five individual forecasting models and three combined forecasting methods: simple-average, Bates-Granger, and the proposed approach. The MAPE and RMSE results indicate that the proposed method outperformed the others, especially when the time-series pattern was stationary and improved the forecasting accuracy of the worst and best individual forecasting models by 35–37% and 7–10%, respectively. Moreover, the proposed method showed improvements in MAPE and RMSE of around 18–20% and 9–11% compared to the simple-average and Bates-Granger methods, respectively. In addition, the combined forecasting methods outperformed the individual forecasting models when analyzing non-stationary data. Remarkably, the performances of the proposed and Bates-Granger methods were almost the same, with improvements in MAPE and RMSE in the range of 1–2% on average. Therefore, the proposed method for creating weights based on the correlation coefficients of the individual forecasting models greatly improves combined forecasting methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18187/pjsor.v19i3.4247\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18187/pjsor.v19i3.4247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在此基础上,建立了组合预测方法的修正权重。这些权重用于根据五个预测模型的相关系数值和排名来调整实际值与预测值之间的相关系数。采用5种独立预测模型和3种组合预测方法(简单平均、贝茨-格兰杰和本文提出的方法)对具有3种模式(平稳、趋势或趋势和季节性)的时间序列数据集进行了分析。MAPE和RMSE结果表明,该方法在时间序列模式平稳的情况下优于其他方法,将最差和最佳个体预测模型的预测精度分别提高了35-37%和7-10%。此外,与简单平均方法和Bates-Granger方法相比,该方法的MAPE和RMSE分别提高了18-20%和9-11%左右。此外,在分析非平稳数据时,组合预测方法优于单个预测模型。值得注意的是,所提出的方法和Bates-Granger方法的性能几乎相同,MAPE和RMSE的平均改进幅度在1-2%之间。因此,本文提出的基于单个预测模型的相关系数创建权重的方法大大改进了组合预测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A modified weighting system for combined forecasting methods based on the correlation coefficients of the individual forecasting models
Herein, a modified weighting for combined forecasting methods is established. These weights are used to adjust the correlation coefficient between the actual and predicted values from five individual forecasting models based on their correlation coefficient values and ranking. Time-series datasets with three patterns (stationary, trend, or both trend and seasonal) were analyzed by using the five individual forecasting models and three combined forecasting methods: simple-average, Bates-Granger, and the proposed approach. The MAPE and RMSE results indicate that the proposed method outperformed the others, especially when the time-series pattern was stationary and improved the forecasting accuracy of the worst and best individual forecasting models by 35–37% and 7–10%, respectively. Moreover, the proposed method showed improvements in MAPE and RMSE of around 18–20% and 9–11% compared to the simple-average and Bates-Granger methods, respectively. In addition, the combined forecasting methods outperformed the individual forecasting models when analyzing non-stationary data. Remarkably, the performances of the proposed and Bates-Granger methods were almost the same, with improvements in MAPE and RMSE in the range of 1–2% on average. Therefore, the proposed method for creating weights based on the correlation coefficients of the individual forecasting models greatly improves combined forecasting methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信