七氟醚吸入麻醉与丙泊酚全静脉麻醉治疗鼻中隔成形术后喉咙痛和恶心呕吐的比较

Q4 Medicine
M. E. Erbatur, Andaç Dedeoğlu, Okan Andıç, Reşit Saruhan, Recep Gokce, O. Uzundere, E. Gokcek, Cem Kıvılcım Kaçar
{"title":"七氟醚吸入麻醉与丙泊酚全静脉麻醉治疗鼻中隔成形术后喉咙痛和恶心呕吐的比较","authors":"M. E. Erbatur, Andaç Dedeoğlu, Okan Andıç, Reşit Saruhan, Recep Gokce, O. Uzundere, E. Gokcek, Cem Kıvılcım Kaçar","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2023.26879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this prospective observational study was to compare the use of inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane and total intravenous anesthesia with propofol in terms of sore throat and postoperative nausea/vomiting in elective septorhinoplasty cases under general anesthesia. Methods: This study was conducted using the data of 52 participating patients. Following induction of anesthesia, Group 1 (n=26) received sevoflurane inhalation and remifentanil infusion, while Group 2 (n=26) received intravenous propofol and remifentanil infusion. The presence of nausea/vomiting, the presence and severity of sore throat, extubation times, and the number of patients who were given additional analgesics and antiemetics were recorded at the end of operation. Results: Within post-anesthesia care unit, Group 2 had less sore throat at the postoperative 2nd, 6th, and 12th h (p values, respectively: 0,014; 0,004; 0,015; 0,044. The number of patients receiving additional analgesics in the postoperative period was 19 in Group 1 and 9 in Group 2 (p=0.005). The results of the groups in terms of postoperative nausea/vomiting were similar. Conclusion: In septorhinoplasty operations, total intravenous anesthesia with propofol resulted in less sore throat and reduced postoperative analgesic use compared to inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane. Keywords: Sore throat, nausea and vomiting, propofol, septorhinoplasty, sevoflurane, TIVA","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia and Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Propofol in Terms of Postoperative Sore Throat and Nausea/Vomiting in Septorhinoplasty Cases\",\"authors\":\"M. E. Erbatur, Andaç Dedeoğlu, Okan Andıç, Reşit Saruhan, Recep Gokce, O. Uzundere, E. Gokcek, Cem Kıvılcım Kaçar\",\"doi\":\"10.54875/jarss.2023.26879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of this prospective observational study was to compare the use of inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane and total intravenous anesthesia with propofol in terms of sore throat and postoperative nausea/vomiting in elective septorhinoplasty cases under general anesthesia. Methods: This study was conducted using the data of 52 participating patients. Following induction of anesthesia, Group 1 (n=26) received sevoflurane inhalation and remifentanil infusion, while Group 2 (n=26) received intravenous propofol and remifentanil infusion. The presence of nausea/vomiting, the presence and severity of sore throat, extubation times, and the number of patients who were given additional analgesics and antiemetics were recorded at the end of operation. Results: Within post-anesthesia care unit, Group 2 had less sore throat at the postoperative 2nd, 6th, and 12th h (p values, respectively: 0,014; 0,004; 0,015; 0,044. The number of patients receiving additional analgesics in the postoperative period was 19 in Group 1 and 9 in Group 2 (p=0.005). The results of the groups in terms of postoperative nausea/vomiting were similar. Conclusion: In septorhinoplasty operations, total intravenous anesthesia with propofol resulted in less sore throat and reduced postoperative analgesic use compared to inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane. Keywords: Sore throat, nausea and vomiting, propofol, septorhinoplasty, sevoflurane, TIVA\",\"PeriodicalId\":36000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anestezi Dergisi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anestezi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2023.26879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2023.26879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本前瞻性观察研究的目的是比较七氟烷吸入麻醉和丙泊酚全静脉麻醉在全麻下选择性鼻中隔成形术患者喉咙痛和术后恶心/呕吐方面的应用。方法:本研究采用52例参与患者的数据进行。麻醉诱导后,第1组(n=26)接受七氟醚吸入和瑞芬太尼输注,而第2组(n=6)接受静脉注射丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼。在手术结束时记录恶心/呕吐的存在、喉咙痛的存在和严重程度、拔管次数以及服用额外镇痛药和止吐药的患者人数。结果:在麻醉后护理病房内,第2组在术后第2、6和12小时的喉咙痛较少(p值分别为:0014;0004;0015;0044)。术后接受额外镇痛药治疗的患者人数在第1组为19人,在第2组为9人(p=0.005)。两组在术后恶心/呕吐方面的结果相似。结论:在鼻中隔成形术中,与七氟醚吸入麻醉相比,丙泊酚全静脉麻醉减少了喉咙痛,并减少了术后镇痛的使用。关键词:喉咙痛、恶心呕吐、丙泊酚、鼻中隔成形术、七氟醚、TIVA
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia and Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Propofol in Terms of Postoperative Sore Throat and Nausea/Vomiting in Septorhinoplasty Cases
Objective: The objective of this prospective observational study was to compare the use of inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane and total intravenous anesthesia with propofol in terms of sore throat and postoperative nausea/vomiting in elective septorhinoplasty cases under general anesthesia. Methods: This study was conducted using the data of 52 participating patients. Following induction of anesthesia, Group 1 (n=26) received sevoflurane inhalation and remifentanil infusion, while Group 2 (n=26) received intravenous propofol and remifentanil infusion. The presence of nausea/vomiting, the presence and severity of sore throat, extubation times, and the number of patients who were given additional analgesics and antiemetics were recorded at the end of operation. Results: Within post-anesthesia care unit, Group 2 had less sore throat at the postoperative 2nd, 6th, and 12th h (p values, respectively: 0,014; 0,004; 0,015; 0,044. The number of patients receiving additional analgesics in the postoperative period was 19 in Group 1 and 9 in Group 2 (p=0.005). The results of the groups in terms of postoperative nausea/vomiting were similar. Conclusion: In septorhinoplasty operations, total intravenous anesthesia with propofol resulted in less sore throat and reduced postoperative analgesic use compared to inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane. Keywords: Sore throat, nausea and vomiting, propofol, septorhinoplasty, sevoflurane, TIVA
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信