日本的教育与社会正义

IF 0.6 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Kara Juul
{"title":"日本的教育与社会正义","authors":"Kara Juul","doi":"10.1080/09555803.2022.2056229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Japan’s education system has long been a source of fascination for people from a wide variety of fields: from those who wished to emulate it during the heyday of the economic boom, to those who focused on what it had to say about Japan more broadly – warts and all. The debate over whether the Japanese education system can be said to be ‘equal’ has raged for a similar length of time. Classic texts in the genre, such as Cummings (1980) and Rohlen (1983) are frequently juxtaposed to highlight the two sides – with the former arguing that schooling is egalitarian, and the latter underlining the features that complicate that view. Some recent scholarship provides a more comparative education approach, positioning the Japanese system in the globalised debate on equality (Kariya and Rappleye 2020); other works trace the evolution of the concept of equality (and related or competing terms such as egalitarianism and meritocracy) throughout Japanese education policy and the views of the people who make it (Okada 2012). In contrast, Okano’s focus is firmly on the current results of such changes on students themselves. Education and Social Justice in Japan provides an updated evaluation of schooling in Japan; invaluable considering the huge social, economic, and demographic shifts since Okano’s previous book on the subject (Okano and Tsuchiya 1999) was released. This book not only covers what the developments in schooling have been in the intervening thirty years, but also their impact on minorities and disadvantaged pupils and what this means for social justice in the Japanese education system. The book opens by defining what social justice means for the purposes of Okano’s research: both the ‘distribution’ of educational opportunity and the mechanisms by which its content is decided. A thorough look at the history of Japanese schooling until 2019, and its role in shaping Japan into what it is today, follows. Reforms and their reception are also covered, with Okano pointing out that these were less radical than what is often assumed from reactions at the time. Having set the scene, the book pivots to examining specific aspects of Japanese schooling and how things have changed (or not) for students in this system. Okano first focuses on the experiences of children from CLD (culturally and linguistically diverse) groups. Japan is still often assumed to be a homogenous society, and this chapter systematically disabuses the reader of this notion by following students from both longestablished minority backgrounds (such","PeriodicalId":44495,"journal":{"name":"Japan Forum","volume":"34 1","pages":"275 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Education and Social Justice in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Kara Juul\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09555803.2022.2056229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Japan’s education system has long been a source of fascination for people from a wide variety of fields: from those who wished to emulate it during the heyday of the economic boom, to those who focused on what it had to say about Japan more broadly – warts and all. The debate over whether the Japanese education system can be said to be ‘equal’ has raged for a similar length of time. Classic texts in the genre, such as Cummings (1980) and Rohlen (1983) are frequently juxtaposed to highlight the two sides – with the former arguing that schooling is egalitarian, and the latter underlining the features that complicate that view. Some recent scholarship provides a more comparative education approach, positioning the Japanese system in the globalised debate on equality (Kariya and Rappleye 2020); other works trace the evolution of the concept of equality (and related or competing terms such as egalitarianism and meritocracy) throughout Japanese education policy and the views of the people who make it (Okada 2012). In contrast, Okano’s focus is firmly on the current results of such changes on students themselves. Education and Social Justice in Japan provides an updated evaluation of schooling in Japan; invaluable considering the huge social, economic, and demographic shifts since Okano’s previous book on the subject (Okano and Tsuchiya 1999) was released. This book not only covers what the developments in schooling have been in the intervening thirty years, but also their impact on minorities and disadvantaged pupils and what this means for social justice in the Japanese education system. The book opens by defining what social justice means for the purposes of Okano’s research: both the ‘distribution’ of educational opportunity and the mechanisms by which its content is decided. A thorough look at the history of Japanese schooling until 2019, and its role in shaping Japan into what it is today, follows. Reforms and their reception are also covered, with Okano pointing out that these were less radical than what is often assumed from reactions at the time. Having set the scene, the book pivots to examining specific aspects of Japanese schooling and how things have changed (or not) for students in this system. Okano first focuses on the experiences of children from CLD (culturally and linguistically diverse) groups. Japan is still often assumed to be a homogenous society, and this chapter systematically disabuses the reader of this notion by following students from both longestablished minority backgrounds (such\",\"PeriodicalId\":44495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japan Forum\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"275 - 277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japan Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2022.2056229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2022.2056229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,日本的教育体系一直是来自各个领域的人们着迷的源泉:从那些希望在经济繁荣的鼎盛时期效仿日本的人,到那些专注于它对日本更广泛的评价的人——所有的缺点。关于日本教育体系是否可以说是“平等”的争论也持续了类似的时间。这一类型的经典文本,如Cummings(1980)和Rohlen(1983),经常被并置以突出双方——前者认为学校教育是平等的,而后者强调了使这一观点复杂化的特征。最近的一些学术研究提供了一种更具比较性的教育方法,将日本制度定位在全球化的平等辩论中(Kariya和Rappleye 2020);其他作品追溯了平等概念(以及平等主义和精英统治等相关或竞争术语)在整个日本教育政策中的演变以及制定者的观点(Okada 2012)。相比之下,冈野的重点是学生自身目前的这种变化的结果。《日本的教育和社会公正》提供了对日本学校教育的最新评价;考虑到冈野上一本关于这个主题的书(冈野和Tsuchiya 1999)出版以来巨大的社会、经济和人口变化,这是非常宝贵的。这本书不仅涵盖了三十年来学校教育的发展,还涵盖了它们对少数民族和弱势学生的影响,以及这对日本教育体系中的社会正义意味着什么。本书开篇定义了冈野研究中的社会正义意味着什么:教育机会的“分配”及其内容的决定机制。以下是对2019年之前日本学校教育的历史及其在将日本塑造成今天的样子中所起的作用的全面研究。改革及其受到的欢迎也包括在内,冈野指出,这些改革没有当时人们通常认为的那么激进。设置好场景后,这本书重点考察了日本学校教育的具体方面,以及在这个体系中,学生的情况是如何变化的。Okano首先关注来自CLD(文化和语言多样性)群体的儿童的经历。日本仍然经常被认为是一个同质的社会,本章通过跟踪来自两个长期存在的少数民族背景的学生(如
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Education and Social Justice in Japan
Japan’s education system has long been a source of fascination for people from a wide variety of fields: from those who wished to emulate it during the heyday of the economic boom, to those who focused on what it had to say about Japan more broadly – warts and all. The debate over whether the Japanese education system can be said to be ‘equal’ has raged for a similar length of time. Classic texts in the genre, such as Cummings (1980) and Rohlen (1983) are frequently juxtaposed to highlight the two sides – with the former arguing that schooling is egalitarian, and the latter underlining the features that complicate that view. Some recent scholarship provides a more comparative education approach, positioning the Japanese system in the globalised debate on equality (Kariya and Rappleye 2020); other works trace the evolution of the concept of equality (and related or competing terms such as egalitarianism and meritocracy) throughout Japanese education policy and the views of the people who make it (Okada 2012). In contrast, Okano’s focus is firmly on the current results of such changes on students themselves. Education and Social Justice in Japan provides an updated evaluation of schooling in Japan; invaluable considering the huge social, economic, and demographic shifts since Okano’s previous book on the subject (Okano and Tsuchiya 1999) was released. This book not only covers what the developments in schooling have been in the intervening thirty years, but also their impact on minorities and disadvantaged pupils and what this means for social justice in the Japanese education system. The book opens by defining what social justice means for the purposes of Okano’s research: both the ‘distribution’ of educational opportunity and the mechanisms by which its content is decided. A thorough look at the history of Japanese schooling until 2019, and its role in shaping Japan into what it is today, follows. Reforms and their reception are also covered, with Okano pointing out that these were less radical than what is often assumed from reactions at the time. Having set the scene, the book pivots to examining specific aspects of Japanese schooling and how things have changed (or not) for students in this system. Okano first focuses on the experiences of children from CLD (culturally and linguistically diverse) groups. Japan is still often assumed to be a homogenous society, and this chapter systematically disabuses the reader of this notion by following students from both longestablished minority backgrounds (such
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japan Forum
Japan Forum AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信